TELSTAR
Stereotaxis, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75782221 |
| Registration Number | 2704961 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Bryan K. Wheelock |
| Attorney Docket Number | 6154-0009 |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | POWERS, ALEXANDER L |
Timeline
| 1999-08-23 | Application Filed |
| 2000-03-07 | Published for Opposition |
| 2001-05-31 | Date of First Use |
| 2003-04-08 | Trademark Registered |
| 2008-05-08 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2009-11-14 | Cancelled |
| 2009-11-14 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Stereotaxis, Inc. |
| Address | 4041 Forest Park Avenue St. Louis DE 63108 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | magnetic navigation systems for medical applications; magnetic medical devices; magnetic catheters; magnetic endoscopes; magnets and electromagnets for medical applications; magnetic atherectomy devices; magnetic guidewires; medical imaging apparatus; apparatus for locating medical devices in the body; intercranial bolts; tissue samplers; magnetic electrodes and electrode catheters |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-12-03 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-12-10 | 2 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-02-04 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-03-07 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2000-05-30 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2001-03-22 | 6 ABN6 S: |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2002-04-04 | 9 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2001-05-25 | 10 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2000-11-14 | 11 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2001-01-17 | 12 EX1G S: |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2001-05-30 | 13 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2001-10-10 | 14 EX2G S: |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2001-11-30 | 15 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2002-04-15 | 16 EX3G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2002-05-30 | 17 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2002-05-30 | 18 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2002-06-04 | 19 EX4G S: |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2002-11-26 | 20 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2002-11-26 | 21 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-01-28 | 22 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-01-29 | 23 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2003-01-29 | 24 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-04-08 | 25 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-05-08 | 26 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2009-11-14 | 27 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 