IMARA
Wisdom Light L.L.C.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75670309 |
| Registration Number | 2712352 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | John E. Reilly, |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | STOIDES, KATHERINE |
Timeline
| 1990-03-31 | Date of First Use |
| 1999-03-29 | Application Filed |
| 2003-02-11 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-05-06 | Trademark Registered |
| 2008-08-28 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2013-12-13 | Cancelled |
| 2013-12-13 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Wisdom Light L.L.C. |
| Address | 85 South Union Blvd. Q-173 Lakewood CO 80228 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | CO |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0411 | Educational services in the nature of human potential development, namely, providing workshops and classes in leadership in career training, motivational speaking, meditation, regression, alternative healing, interpersonal communication and organizational development |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-08-27 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-09-03 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-03-06 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-07-01 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-07-05 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-08-28 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-12-04 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2000-12-07 | 8 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2001-09-06 | 9 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-04-22 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2002-04-22 | 11 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REINSTATED | 2002-09-16 | 12 REIN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-09-19 | 13 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-12-09 | 14 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-01-22 | 15 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-02-11 | 16 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-05-06 | 17 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-05-20 | 18 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | 2008-07-22 | 19 ES8R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-08-04 | 20 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2008-08-28 | 21 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2013-12-13 | 22 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 