ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE
Alternative Medicine.com, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75638896 |
| Registration Number | 2892026 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | SCOTT G WARNER |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOH |
Timeline
| 1999-01-01 | Date of First Use |
| 1999-02-10 | Application Filed |
| 2002-07-01 | Amend to Register |
| 2004-10-05 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2004-10-05 | Trademark Registered |
| 2014-05-12 | Cancelled |
| 2014-05-12 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE.COM, INC. |
| Address | 1650 TIBURON BLVD, SUITE 2 TIBURTON DE 94920 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 16 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,005,022,023,029,037,038,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0161 | Printed material, namely, magazines, issued periodically, on the subject of health care |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-08-06 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-08-11 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-26 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2000-09-27 | 4 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2001-10-27 | 5 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REINSTATED | 2001-07-23 | 6 REIN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-09-13 | 7 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2002-05-06 | 8 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-07-01 | 9 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2002-07-17 | 10 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2002-09-13 | 11 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-09-16 | 12 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-09-26 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-06-18 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-11-14 | 15 CNSL S: |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-02-11 | 16 CNSL S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-03-31 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-03-31 | 18 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-04-16 | 19 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2004-07-27 | 20 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2004-08-04 | 21 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2004-08-04 | 22 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2004-10-05 | 23 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2014-05-12 | 24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 