PROTAG

Pe Corporation (ny)

Application Filed: 1999-01-22

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	75625569
Mark Drawing Code	1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s)
Attorney Name	Jorge C. Barreno
Law Office Assigned	L30
Employee Name	STIGLITZ, SUSAN R

Timeline

1999-01-22	Application Filed
2000-04-04	Published for Opposition
2003-06-28	Abandon
2003-06-28	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2003-10-17	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	PE CORPORATION (NY)
Name Change Details	NC20000001BY CHANGE OF NAME\|NC99990001BY CHANGE OF NAME
Address	APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS 850 LINCOLN CENTRE DRIVE Foster City NY 94404
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	NY

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Jorge C. Barreno
PE APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS
850 LINCOLN CENTRE DR
FOSTER CITY CA 94404

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
GS0091	Computer software and hardware used for predicting peptide and protein fragments; computer database used to collect, integrate, analyze, manage, and communicate data from or related to peptide and protein fragments

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	1999-07-06	1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	1999-07-12	2 CNRT F:First Action
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2000-01-10	3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2000-02-04	4 CNSA P:
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2000-03-03	5 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2000-04-04	6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2000-06-27	7 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2000-12-21	8 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2001-02-07	9 EX1G S:
EXTENSION 2 FILED	2001-06-27	10 EXT2 S:
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	2001-07-09	11 EX2G S:
EXTENSION 3 FILED	2001-11-20	12 EXT3 S:
EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	2001-11-30	13 EX3G S:
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2002-05-29	14 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 4 FILED	2002-05-29	15 EXT4 S:
EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	2002-06-01	16 EX4G S:
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2002-11-05	17 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 5 FILED	2002-11-05	18 EXT5 S:
EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	2002-12-09	19 EX5G S:
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2003-09-22	20 ABN6 S:

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
PROTAG 79131762 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Innova Technology Private Limited 2013-04-18
PROTAG 78289208 2961167 Dead/Cancelled	Food Investments Limited 2003-08-19
PROTAG 78267153 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Applera Corporation 2003-06-25
PROTAG 76388527 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Applera Corporation 1999-01-21
PROTAG 76226415 2769721 Dead/Cancelled	Permasign Limited 2001-03-19
PROTAG 75625569 not registered Dead/Abandoned	PE CORPORATION (NY) 1999-01-22
PROTAG 75329689 not registered Dead/Abandoned	PLANTS INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD 1997-07-24
PROTAG 73767623 1657109 Dead/Cancelled	SMITHKLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION 1988-12-05

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.