LMI
LMI Technologies Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75513760 |
| Registration Number | 2453566 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Mikolean Morgan Longacre |
| Attorney Name | Paul Smith |
| Attorney Docket Number | 8007T2 |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | MEIER, SHARON A |
Timeline
| 1998-07-06 | Application Filed |
| 1999-04-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-03-14 | Published for Opposition |
| 2001-05-22 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-06-18 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2011-12-23 | Cancelled |
| 2011-12-23 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  LMI Technologies Inc. |
| Address | 1673 Cliveden Avenue Delta, British Col CA V3M6V5 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | process optimization systems for measurement and control of production lines, namely, sensors, programmable logic controller, computer hardware, computer software and computer user interface devices, all used to measure the position or dimensions of workpieces or their progress in a production line |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-02-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-02-24 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-07-13 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-08-12 | 4 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-02-11 | 5 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-03-14 | 6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2000-06-06 | 7 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2000-12-01 | 8 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2001-02-13 | 9 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2001-02-16 | 10 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-05-22 | 11 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-09-06 | 12 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-08-11 | 13 CORV P: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-11-02 | 14 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2007-05-18 | 15 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2007-05-18 | 16 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-06-13 | 17 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2007-06-18 | 18 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2011-12-23 | 19 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2016-11-25 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2016-11-25 | 21 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 