NEXTLAW
Clifford Chance Llp
Application Filed: 1998-06-29
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75509821 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Steven T. Shelaton |
| Attorney Name | Steven T. Shelton, |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | AYALA, LOURDES |
Timeline
| 1998-06-29 | Application Filed |
| 2002-09-24 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-12-29 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2005-12-18 | Abandon |
| 2005-12-18 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CLIFFORD CHANCE LLP |
| Name Change Details | NC20000001BY CHANGE OF NAME|NC99990001BY CHANGE OF NAME; BY CHANGE OF NAME |
| Entity Statement | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP |
| Address | 200 ALDERGATE STREET LONDON NY GB EC1A4JJ |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Sound and video recordings featuring information, images, text, audio content or code relating to law or regulatory matters; computer software containing databases of information, images, text, or audio content in the field of law or regulatory matters, or containing databases of electronic manuals or electronic instructional materials in the fields of law or regulatory matters; computer software for facilitating access to electronic communications networks, or for searching, retrieving, organizing or display of information taken from electronic communications networks; photographic slide transparencies; cinematographic films featuring information, images, audio content or text relating to law or regulatory matters |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-01-29 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-02-04 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-03-01 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-09-07 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-09-28 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-10-15 | 6 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-04-18 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-07-13 | 8 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-01-16 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2001-04-23 | 10 CNSL F:First Action |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2001-06-04 | 11 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-03-22 | 12 CNSI S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-05-10 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-05-21 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-05-10 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-06-19 | 16 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-09-04 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-09-24 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-12-17 | 19 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-04-02 | 20 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-06-17 | 21 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2003-06-17 | 22 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-09-26 | 23 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2003-09-26 | 24 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-12-08 | 25 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-06-17 | 26 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-12-08 | 27 EX1G S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-01-02 | 28 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2004-04-20 | 29 ABN6 S: |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2004-01-02 | 30 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2004-05-17 | 31 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2003-12-17 | 32 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2004-01-17 | 33 EX2G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-06-17 | 34 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-06-28 | 35 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2004-06-17 | 36 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2004-06-17 | 37 EX3G S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-10-19 | 38 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-12-17 | 39 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2004-12-17 | 40 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2004-12-30 | 41 EX4G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2005-06-13 | 42 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2005-06-13 | 43 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2005-06-13 | 44 EX5G S: |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2006-02-24 | 45 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2006-02-24 | 46 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 