MASTER CRAFT
Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75489491 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | DANIEL W MCDONALD |
| Attorney Docket Number | 2628.83-US-0 |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | CAIN, CATHERINE P |
Timeline
| 1998-05-22 | Application Filed |
| 2000-12-05 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-12-04 | Abandon |
| 2003-12-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2004-12-02 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. |
| Address | 4400 Baker Road Minnetonka DE 55343 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,021,023,031,034 |
| International Codes: | 17 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,005,012,013,035,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0111 | Electric fans, DC inspection lamps |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-02-08 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-02-08 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-02-17 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-08-17 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-11-06 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2000-01-03 | 6 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-03-06 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-05-07 | 8 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-07-14 | 9 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-08-15 | 10 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-06 | 11 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-11-03 | 12 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-12-05 | 13 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-01-04 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2001-01-04 | 15 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-29 | 16 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-10-16 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-12-03 | 18 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-12-27 | 19 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-03-05 | 20 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-03-24 | 21 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-06-05 | 22 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2003-06-05 | 23 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-11-17 | 24 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-06-03 | 25 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-11-17 | 26 EX1G S: |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2004-02-26 | 27 ABN6 S: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 