SPORTVISION
Sportvision Systems, Llc
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75355658 |
| Registration Number | 2436087 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5R07: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | BURT MAGEN |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | FIRST, VIVIAN M |
Timeline
| 1997-09-12 | Application Filed |
| 1997-11-04 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-12-26 | Published for Opposition |
| 2001-03-20 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2001-03-20 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-12-22 | Cancelled |
| 2007-12-22 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  SPORTVISION SYSTEMS, LLC |
| Name Change Details | NC30000001BY ASSIGNMENT |
| Entity Statement | LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION |
| Address | 250 WEST 57TH STREET SUITE 814 NEW YORK NY 10107 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | Technical consultation for, development of and implementation of technology based enhancements for sports television productions and other sports video applications, the video and broadcast needs of stadiums and arenas, and multimedia games; and developing computer software for others for implementing technology based enhancements for sports television productions and other sports video applications |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-04-17 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-04-29 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1998-05-15 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1998-10-20 | 4 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1998-11-05 | 5 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-10-20 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 1998-11-12 | 7 IUAA P: |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-11-13 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1999-02-10 | 9 CNSL F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-09-21 | 10 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-11-24 | 11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-12-26 | 12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-03-20 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-02-28 | 14 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2006-07-12 | 15 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2007-12-22 | 16 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2016-03-23 | 17 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2016-03-30 | 18 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2016-04-27 | 19 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 