Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 75329825 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | Pennie & Edmonds LLP |
Attorney Name | JOSEPH DIAMANTE |
Attorney Docket Number | 8870.009.999 |
Law Office Assigned | L90 |
Employee Name | LORENZO, GEORGE M |
1997-07-24 | Application Filed |
1998-09-22 | Published for Opposition |
2001-12-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2002-05-02 | Abandon |
2002-07-25 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ZEN RESEARCH, N.V. |
Address | Van Engelenweg 21A Curacao AN |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | AN |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | parts for optical disc drives; computer software for the operation of optical disc drives; computer software which increases the performance of optical disc drives; computer software used to develop software for optical disc drives; multimedia games on optical disc; multimedia software, namely, software which arranges sound, images, text, film, animation and video for use in the creation of video games, video presentations, movies and educational and training materials; database software; indexing software; word processing software; presentation software; multimedia presentation software; multimedia authoring software; pattern recognition software; image presentation software; animation software; 2D and 3D graphics presentation software; document storage and retrieval software; image editing software; graphical editing software; spreadsheet software; global computer information network browser software; software used to access optical disc based data on commands received from a global computer information network |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-03-17 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-03-23 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1998-04-07 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-06-11 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1998-07-06 | 5 CNSA P: |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1998-08-21 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1998-09-22 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1998-12-15 | 8 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1999-06-14 | 9 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1999-08-27 | 10 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXTENSION 1 FILED | 1999-06-14 | 11 EXT1 S: |
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 1999-08-25 | 12 EX1G S: |
EXTENSION 2 FILED | 1999-12-15 | 13 EXT2 S: |
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2000-02-11 | 14 EX2G S: |
EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2000-06-15 | 15 EXT3 S: |
EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2000-08-14 | 16 EX3G S: |
EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2000-12-15 | 17 EXT4 S: |
EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2000-12-15 | 18 EX4G S: |
EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2001-06-11 | 19 EXT5 S: |
EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2001-06-21 | 20 EX5G S: |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2002-05-02 | 21 ABN6 S: |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.