Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 75078370 |
Registration Number | 2574785 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | JOSEPH R. MARCUS |
Attorney Docket Number | 3859.66378 |
Law Office Assigned | L20 |
Employee Name | BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKI |
1996-03-25 | Application Filed |
1996-05-14 | Date of First Use |
2002-03-12 | Published for Opposition |
2002-06-04 | Trademark Registered |
2008-06-14 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
2013-01-11 | Cancelled |
2013-01-11 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Riverside Health System |
Entity Statement | NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION |
Address | 350 North Wall Street Kankakee IL 609012901 |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | IL |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
AF0421 | First used in another form on January 20, 1963 |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-10-07 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-10-15 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1997-04-03 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-06-27 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1997-07-03 | 5 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1997-12-17 | 6 CNSL F:First Action |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-02-17 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1998-02-17 | 8 IUAF S: |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1998-06-09 | 9 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-02-17 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1998-11-18 | 11 CNRT F:First Action |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-05-14 | 12 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1999-05-17 | 13 CNEA F:First Action |
USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 1999-05-24 | 14 IUAA P: |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-05-24 | 15 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1999-09-03 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1999-10-05 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2000-02-22 | 18 CU.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2002-01-14 | 19 CU.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-02-20 | 20 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-03-12 | 21 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-06-04 | 22 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-09-11 | 23 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2008-05-19 | 24 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-05-30 | 25 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2008-06-14 | 26 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2013-01-11 | 27 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.