HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED
Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75058511 |
| Registration Number | 2085465 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | ROGER D EMERSON |
| Attorney Docket Number | FLEE 512856 |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | JENKINS JR, CHARLES L |
Timeline
| 1995-08-11 | Date of First Use |
| 1996-02-15 | Application Filed |
| 1997-05-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 1997-08-05 | Trademark Registered |
| 2006-10-31 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2007-03-06 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2007-08-05 | Renewal Date |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC. |
| Address | 525 W. VAN BUREN STREET CHICAGO DE 60607 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | cleaner and stain and finish remover for wood |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-08-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-08-12 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-08-15 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-03-04 | 4 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1997-04-11 | 5 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1997-05-13 | 6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-08-05 | 7 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2003-03-26 | 8 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2003-03-26 | 9 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2003-06-26 | 10 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-11-19 | 11 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2006-08-18 | 12 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2006-08-18 | 13 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2006-10-20 | 14 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2006-10-31 | 15 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2006-10-31 | 16 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-03-06 | 17 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2008-04-30 | 18 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2016-08-05 | 19 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-05-01 | 20 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED 75058511 2085465 Live/Registered |
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC. 1996-02-15 |
 HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED 75058510 2249905 Dead/Cancelled |
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC. 1996-02-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 