ULTRA GUARD
Uv Systems Technology Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75056079 |
| Registration Number | 2265236 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | DANIEL J. KRENTZ |
| Attorney Name | Ron Riches |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | BAXLEY, ANDREW P |
Timeline
| 1996-02-12 | Application Filed |
| 1998-02-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1998-07-21 | Published for Opposition |
| 1999-07-27 | Trademark Registered |
| 2006-04-29 | Cancelled |
| 2006-04-29 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2006-08-25 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  UV SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC. |
| Address | 2800 INGLETON AVENUE BURNABY, BRITISH C CA V5C 6G7 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,021,023,031,034 |
| International Codes: | 37 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0111 | domestic, commercial, municipal and industrial potable water, sewage, sewage effluent, waste water, liquids, fluids and air disinfection units which use ultra violet rays alone or in combination with oxidizing agents |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-07-22 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-08-13 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1997-02-13 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-03-20 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1997-03-21 | 5 CNSL F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-09-02 | 6 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1997-09-04 | 7 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-03-02 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1998-03-23 | 9 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-03-11 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1998-05-06 | 11 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1998-06-19 | 12 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1998-07-21 | 13 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1998-10-13 | 14 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 1999-04-09 | 15 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 1999-04-09 | 16 EX1G S: |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1999-04-09 | 17 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1999-04-09 | 18 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-05-17 | 19 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 1999-05-18 | 20 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-07-27 | 21 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2006-04-29 | 22 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-08-25 | 23 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 