AMFLEX
ADVANCED MACHINE & ENGINEERING CO.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74684331 |
| Registration Number | 1995061 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3S07: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Timothy P. Naill |
| Attorney Docket Number | 511287 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | FIRST, VIVIAN M |
Timeline
| 1995-05-15 | Date of First Use |
| 1995-06-05 | Application Filed |
| 1996-05-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 1996-08-20 | Trademark Registered |
| 2006-08-20 | Renewal Date |
| 2007-02-07 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2007-02-07 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  ADVANCED MACHINE & ENGINEERING CO. |
| Address | 2500 Latham Street Rockford IL 61103 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | IL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 260701 | Diamonds with plain multiple line border; Diamonds with plain single line border |
| 261121 | Rectangles that are completely or partially shaded |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 6 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,012,013,014,023,025,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The mark consists of the term "AMFLEX". |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-11-21 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1995-12-05 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-12-26 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-02-20 | 4 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | 1996-02-26 | 5 ZZZX Z:Deletion |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1996-02-29 | 6 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-03-11 | 7 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1996-04-26 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1996-05-28 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-08-20 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | 2002-02-11 | 11 8.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2002-04-19 | 12 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-07-11 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2006-12-07 | 14 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2006-12-07 | 15 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-02-07 | 16 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2007-02-07 | 17 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2007-02-07 | 18 RNL1 Q: |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2017-08-28 | 19 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2017-08-28 | 20 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-04-24 | 21 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 