ROMA
Nicolia Concrete Products, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74428753 |
| Registration Number | 1981860 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Murray Schaffer |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | CHUNG, SARAH L |
Timeline
| 1992-08-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1993-08-26 | Application Filed |
| 1996-04-02 | Published for Opposition |
| 1996-06-25 | Trademark Registered |
| 2006-06-25 | Renewal Date |
| 2017-06-28 | Cancelled |
| 2017-06-28 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 |
| 2017-06-28 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  NICOLIA CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. |
| Address | 275 E. Sunrise Highway Lindenhurst NY 11757 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 19 |
| U.S. Codes: | 012 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0191 | paving blocks |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-01-26 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-01-27 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-03-07 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-09-09 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1994-12-21 | 5 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 1995-07-10 | 6 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-11-14 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-01-11 | 8 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1996-03-01 | 9 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1996-04-02 | 10 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-06-25 | 11 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2002-04-19 | 12 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2002-06-18 | 13 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-04-09 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-08-31 | 15 CORV P: |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2006-12-19 | 16 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-02-16 | 17 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2007-02-26 | 18 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2007-02-26 | 19 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-06-20 | 20 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2015-08-27 | 21 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2015-08-27 | 22 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2015-09-25 | 23 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | 2015-10-05 | 24 PR89 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | 2017-06-28 | 25 C8.T O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 