CARIBBEAN
Roush Products Company, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74412598 |
| Registration Number | 2034685 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 1 |
| Attorney Name | MITCHELL H STABBE |
| Attorney Docket Number | 1230.504TM |
| Law Office Assigned | L10 |
| Employee Name | MULLEN, MARK TIMOTHY |
Timeline
| 1993-07-15 | Application Filed |
| 1993-09-15 | Date of First Use |
| 1996-11-12 | Published for Opposition |
| 1997-02-04 | Trademark Registered |
| 1998-04-03 | Cancelled |
| 1998-04-03 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 1998-05-11 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  ROUSH PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. |
| Address | 1000 Wenig Road, N.E. Cedar Rapids CA 52406 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0301 | bakery products; namely, fresh bread |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1993-11-02 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1993-11-03 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1993-11-05 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1993-12-02 | 4 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1994-01-06 | 5 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 1994-03-31 | 6 IUAA P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-04-01 | 7 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-04-26 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-07-01 | 9 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-06-30 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1994-08-16 | 11 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-02-16 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-03-17 | 13 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-05-08 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-05-09 | 15 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1995-05-10 | 16 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-07-03 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1995-10-23 | 18 CNSL F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-08-06 | 19 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1996-10-11 | 20 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1996-11-12 | 21 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-02-04 | 22 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | 1997-07-16 | 23 C7RF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | 1997-09-01 | 24 PRAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | 1998-01-15 | 25 RRPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | 1998-04-03 | 26 C7.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 