MOTHER GOOSE
Kessler Marketing Group, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74284091 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Leonard Bloom |
| Attorney Docket Number | 864-027 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | BILLINGS, JESSIE W |
Timeline
| 1992-06-12 | Application Filed |
| 1996-08-19 | Abandon |
| 1996-08-19 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 1999-04-09 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  KESSLER MARKETING GROUP, INC. |
| Address | P.O. Box 353 Owings Mills MD 211170353 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MD |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 031506 | Ducks; Geese; Goose; Swans |
| 260102 | Circles, plain single line; Plain single line circles |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 8 |
| U.S. Codes: | 023 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0081 | tableware; namely, knives, forks, and spoons |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-09-01 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-09-11 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1992-09-23 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-11-12 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1992-12-07 | 5 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1993-02-10 | 6 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-12-07 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1993-02-25 | 8 CNSL F:First Action |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1994-05-02 | 9 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1994-05-02 | 10 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1994-05-02 | 11 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1994-07-14 | 12 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1994-07-14 | 13 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1994-07-14 | 14 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-12-01 | 15 CNRT F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-07-10 | 16 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 1995-08-16 | 17 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REINSTATED | 1995-12-04 | 18 REIN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1995-05-23 | 19 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1996-01-18 | 20 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 1996-02-06 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 1995-10-19 | 22 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 1996-07-30 | 23 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-08-14 | 24 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 1996-08-19 | 25 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 