SUPREME BRAND
The Wax Company, Llc
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74258704 |
| Registration Number | 1714785 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Robert B. Burlingame |
| Attorney Docket Number | 089929 |
| Law Office Assigned | G50 |
| Employee Name | YOON, TAE H |
Timeline
| 1991-08-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1992-03-24 | Application Filed |
| 1992-06-16 | Amend to Register |
| 1992-09-08 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-09-08 | Renewal Date |
| 2013-03-19 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2013-03-19 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-12 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  THE WAX COMPANY, LLC |
| Address | P.O. BOX 60 AMORY MS 38821 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | MS |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 31 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0311 | seeds for agricultural purposes consisting of a mixture of wheat, oats, clovers and grasses, with the resulting growth to be used for feeding by wild game animals |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-05-28 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-06-09 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1992-06-16 | 3 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1992-06-29 | 4 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1992-09-08 | 5 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1998-09-04 | 6 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 1998-12-09 | 7 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-09-09 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2002-09-09 | 9 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2002-11-30 | 10 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2002-11-30 | 11 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-02-20 | 12 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2013-03-07 | 13 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2013-03-19 | 14 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2013-03-19 | 15 RNL2 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2013-03-19 | 16 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2013-03-20 | 17 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2014-09-10 | 18 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-07-11 | 19 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-07-11 | 20 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2021-09-08 | 21 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2023-03-24 | 22 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 