ELENA
Richard Ravid, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74234129 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Jerold I. Schneider |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | CONN, WILLIAM |
Timeline
| 1991-12-30 | Application Filed |
| 1995-05-09 | Published for Opposition |
| 1997-08-08 | Abandon |
| 1997-08-08 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 1997-11-04 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Richard Ravid, Inc. |
| Address | 4250 Normandy Court Royal Oak MI 48073 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MI |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,034 |
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 029 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | hair care products; namely, hair color; bath products; namely, bath oils, bubble bath, bath gels, bath powder, hand soap, personal soap, facial soap, liquid soap, deodorant, talc; cosmetics; namely, blush, lipstick, foundation, powder; skin care products; namely, lotions, creams, gels, moisturizers, sun tan lotions, sun screens, facial treatments, masques, hair depilatory, shaving creams; nail care products; namely, artificial nail tips, nail treatments in the nature of liquid top coats, base coats, nail hardeners, nail ridge fillers, nail strengtheners, and nail polish; polish removers, acrylic nails, nail glue; aerosol and non-aerosol spray nail polish dryers and topcoat nail polish dryers; perfume |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-03-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1992-04-08 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-09-25 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1992-12-01 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1993-05-28 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1993-08-30 | 6 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1994-12-07 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1995-04-07 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1995-05-09 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1995-08-01 | 10 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 1996-02-01 | 11 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1996-05-17 | 12 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 1996-02-01 | 13 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 1996-05-17 | 14 EX1G S: |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 1996-07-31 | 15 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 1996-10-03 | 16 EX2G S: |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 1997-01-23 | 17 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 1997-03-17 | 18 EX3G S: |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 1997-08-08 | 19 ABN6 S: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 