SECOND SIGHT
Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74231242 |
| Registration Number | 1716944 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Greg Lam |
| Law Office Assigned | G60 |
| Employee Name | FRIEDMAN, RICHA |
Timeline
| 1956-08-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1991-12-17 | Application Filed |
| 1992-06-23 | Published for Opposition |
| 1992-09-15 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-09-15 | Renewal Date |
| 2012-10-17 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2012-10-17 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc. |
| Address | 371 East Jericho Turnpike Smithtown NY 117872976 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | charitable services; namely, providing guide dogs for the blind |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1992-02-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1992-02-28 | 2 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1992-05-22 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1992-06-23 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1992-09-15 | 5 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1998-09-04 | 6 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 1998-12-23 | 7 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | 1999-05-28 | 8 RRPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1999-08-14 | 9 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2002-03-14 | 10 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2002-05-14 | 11 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2002-05-14 | 12 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-02-27 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2012-10-11 | 14 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2012-10-17 | 15 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2012-10-17 | 16 RNL2 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2012-10-17 | 17 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2021-09-15 | 18 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2023-01-17 | 19 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2023-08-04 | 20 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2023-08-04 | 21 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2023-08-04 | 22 RNL3 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2023-08-04 | 23 NA89 E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 