DUNHILL
Alfred Dunhill Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74227826 |
| Registration Number | 1799883 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5R15: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. |
| Attorney Name | LAWRENCE E APOLZON |
| Law Office Assigned | G20 |
| Employee Name | KING, CHRISTINA B |
Timeline
| 1922-00-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1991-12-06 | Application Filed |
| 1992-09-22 | Published for Opposition |
| 1993-10-19 | Trademark Registered |
| 2003-10-19 | Renewal Date |
| 2007-09-14 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2016-02-19 | Cancelled |
| 2016-02-19 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Alfred Dunhill Limited |
| Address | 15 Hill Street London W1J 5QT GB GB2 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | GB |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 14 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,027,028,050 |
| International Codes: | 18 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,002,003,022,041 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0141 | jewelry and watches |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1992-02-05 | 1 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1992-02-22 | 2 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1992-08-21 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1992-09-22 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1992-12-15 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1993-06-08 | 6 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1993-07-23 | 7 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 1993-08-04 | 8 CNPR P: |
| PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | 1993-08-07 | 9 ZZZX Z:Deletion |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 1993-08-09 | 10 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1993-10-19 | 11 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1999-03-31 | 12 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1999-08-31 | 13 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2003-10-09 | 14 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2003-12-18 | 15 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2003-12-18 | 16 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-09-14 | 17 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2007-11-13 | 18 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2007-11-13 | 19 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2015-01-13 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2015-01-13 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2016-02-19 | 22 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 