EUROSTAR
Eurostar, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74202707 |
| Registration Number | 2394487 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3S11: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | EVAN M KENT |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | BERK, STEVEN R |
Timeline
| 1991-09-12 | Application Filed |
| 1991-12-30 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-03-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2000-10-17 | Trademark Registered |
| 2006-01-19 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK |
| 2007-07-21 | Cancelled |
| 2007-07-21 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  EUROSTAR, INC. |
| Address | 13425 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles CA 90061 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 010103 | Star |
| 270305 | Objects forming letters or numerals |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | casual shoes, running shoes, basketball shoes, tennis shoes, cross training shoes, aerobics shoes, hiking shoes, volleyball shoes, excluding shoes and footwear designed for horseback riding, all sold through stores specializing in shoes and footwear and at swap meets |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1991-11-22 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1992-01-03 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1992-07-02 | 3 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1992-07-16 | 4 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-07-02 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 1992-07-29 | 6 IUAA P: |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1992-08-14 | 7 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1993-02-12 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1993-04-06 | 9 CNSL F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-11-07 | 10 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1995-08-09 | 11 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-09-18 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-10-23 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-12-08 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-12-15 | 15 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-02-25 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-03-28 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2000-04-20 | 18 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-10-17 | 19 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-07-18 | 20 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-01-19 | 21 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2007-07-21 | 22 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 