OPINIONGRAM
Postal Buddy Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74114029 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Bernard L. Kleinke |
| Attorney Docket Number | 30,295.00 |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | SPARROW, MARY |
Timeline
| 1990-11-09 | Application Filed |
| 1995-01-31 | Published for Opposition |
| 2000-08-07 | Abandon |
| 2000-08-07 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2001-03-21 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Postal Buddy Corporation |
| Address | 4411 Morena Boulevard, #150 San Diego CA 92117 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 38 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0381 | providing computer terminals for use by the public to create interactively recommended opinion correspondence and to recommend selected policy and decision makers to receive such correspondence |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1991-04-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1991-06-12 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1991-09-23 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1991-11-12 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-02-18 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1992-07-09 | 6 CNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-11-06 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1993-02-02 | 8 CNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1993-05-17 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1993-06-23 | 10 CNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 1993-12-17 | 11 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | 1994-07-25 | 12 EXPR T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | 1994-07-25 | 13 EXPR T:TTAB Proceeding |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1994-07-29 | 14 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1995-01-02 | 15 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1995-01-31 | 16 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 1995-01-15 | 17 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 1996-02-06 | 18 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 1998-09-22 | 19 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2000-08-03 | 20 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2000-08-07 | 21 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 OPINIONGRAM 74398330 2439709 Dead/Cancelled |
WESTERN UNION HOLDINGS, INC. 1993-06-03 |
 OPINIONGRAM 74114029 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Postal Buddy Corporation 1990-11-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 