SPORTS GEAR

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha

Application Filed: 1990-01-24

Trademark Application Details

Mark For: SPORTS GEAR™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of electronic watches. [all]

Status

2021-08-05 UTC

DEAD APPLICATION Refused Dismissed or Invalidated

This trademark application was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office and this application is no longer active.

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	74022179
Mark Literal Elements	SPORTS GEAR
Mark Drawing Type	1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S)
Mark Type	TRADEMARK
Standard Character Claim	No
Register	PRINCIPAL
Current Location	FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 1993-05-12
Basis	Basis Not Found
Class Status	ABANDONED
Primary International Class	014 - Primary Class (Jewelry) Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes; jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments.
Filed Use	No
Current Use	No
Intent To Use	No
Filed ITU	No
44D Filed	No
44E Current	No
66A Current	No
Current Basis	No
No Basis	No
Domestic Representative	Foley & Lardner
Attorney Name	ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
Law Office Assigned	G70
Employee Name	CLARK, ROBERT C

Timeline

1990-01-24	Application Filed
1992-06-26	Abandon
1992-06-26	Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial
1992-06-26	Status: Dead/Abandoned
1993-05-12	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)

Party:	Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Address	6-1, 2-Chome, Nishi Shinjuku Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo JAPAN
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	JAPAN

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
FOLEY & LARDNER
P.O. BOX 299
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0200

Good, Services, and Codes

(ABANDONED)
IC 014. US 027. G & S: electronic watches

International Codes:	14
U.S. Codes:	027

Type Code	Type
GS0141	electronic watches

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Proceeding Number
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	1992-12-17	22179
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	1992-06-26	22179
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	1992-06-26
EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	1992-03-27
CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	1991-09-27
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	1991-08-13
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	1990-12-31
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	1990-10-12
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	1990-04-12
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	1990-04-06	59500

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
SPORTS GEAR 76384611 3022162 Dead/Cancelled	Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 2002-03-15
SPORTS GEAR 75466565 2319820 Dead/Cancelled	Leon Bush Manufacturing, Inc. 1998-04-13
SPORTS GEAR 74445647 1878313 Dead/Cancelled	Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 1993-10-12
SPORTS GEAR 74237849 1734185 Dead/Cancelled	Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 1992-01-15
SPORTS GEAR 74131629 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Dynamic Classics, Ltd. 1991-01-18
SPORTS GEAR 74022179 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 1990-01-24

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.