CYBERLUX
Industrias Frigilux, C.a.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73753767 |
| Registration Number | 1781083 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | KING & SPALDING |
| Attorney Name | JOAN L. DILLON |
| Law Office Assigned | G50 |
| Employee Name | BODSON, MICHAEL E |
Timeline
| 1988-09-22 | Application Filed |
| 1992-10-27 | Published for Opposition |
| 1993-07-13 | Trademark Registered |
| 1993-08-10 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2000-07-03 | Cancelled |
| 2000-07-03 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  INDUSTRIAS FRIGILUX, C.A. |
| Address | URBANIZACION GUAICAY EDIFICIO CENTRO EMINCA LA TRINIDAD, CARAC VE |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | VE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 023 |
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,026 |
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 034 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| PM0001 | CYBER LUX |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1988-11-07 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1988-11-22 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1989-05-23 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1989-06-14 | 4 CNSL O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1990-01-02 | 5 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-02-05 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1990-02-16 | 7 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-03-19 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1990-03-30 | 9 CNSL F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1990-10-02 | 10 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1990-10-02 | 11 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1991-04-04 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1991-06-05 | 13 CNSL F:First Action |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1992-01-30 | 14 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-05-26 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1992-05-26 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1992-08-17 | 17 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1992-09-25 | 18 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1992-10-27 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1993-07-13 | 20 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2000-07-03 | 21 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 CYBERLUX 76339373 2757137 Dead/Cancelled |
Cyberlux Corporation 2001-11-16 |
 CYBERLUX 73753767 1781083 Dead/Cancelled |
INDUSTRIAS FRIGILUX, C.A. 1988-09-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 