DYN-O-LITE
Duro Dyne Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73659290 |
| Registration Number | 1471292 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Barry G. Magidoff |
| Attorney Docket Number | B1635/B1906/ |
| Law Office Assigned | 580 |
Timeline
| 1987-03-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1987-05-07 | Application Filed |
| 1987-10-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 1988-01-05 | Trademark Registered |
| 2008-01-05 | Renewal Date |
| 2008-03-04 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2008-03-04 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  DURO DYNE CORPORATION |
| Address | ROUTE #110 FARMINGDALE NY 11735 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,034 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| PM0001 | DYNO-LIGHT; DYNE LIGHT; DYNAMITE LIGHT |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1987-07-29 | 1 CNRT F:First Action |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 1987-08-12 | 2 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1987-08-18 | 3 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1987-09-11 | 4 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1987-10-13 | 5 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1988-01-05 | 6 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1993-01-29 | 7 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 1993-04-30 | 8 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1993-05-19 | 9 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | 1993-05-19 | 10 RRPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1993-05-19 | 11 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1993-07-27 | 12 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-05-07 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2008-02-26 | 14 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-03-03 | 15 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2008-03-04 | 16 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2008-03-04 | 17 RNL1 Q: |
| NOTICE OF SUIT | 2010-01-28 | 18 NOSU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF SUIT | 2010-01-28 | 19 NOSU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2010-02-26 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-03-27 | 21 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 DYN-O-LITE 77505088 3790777 Dead/Cancelled |
Imperial Designs, LLC 2008-06-23 |
 DYN-O-LITE 73659290 1471292 Live/Registered |
DURO DYNE CORPORATION 1987-05-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 