GUT BUSTER
Consumer Direct Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73617942 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | MICHAEL SAND |
| Law Office Assigned | 510 |
| Employee Name | RUPP, TERESA M |
Timeline
| 1986-08-27 | Date of First Use |
| 1986-09-03 | Application Filed |
| 1986-10-03 | Abandon |
| 1986-11-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 1986-12-05 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CONSUMER DIRECT INC. |
| Address | 1375 RAFF ROAD S.W. CANTON OH 44710 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | OH |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 28 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0281 | EXERCISE EQUIPMENT |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1986-11-12 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | 1986-11-13 | 2 ABN1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 