Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 73243115 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & ENGELBERG |
Attorney Name | MICHAEL J. BERGER |
Law Office Assigned | 570 |
Employee Name | SZOKE, MICHAEL A |
1979-12-17 | Application Filed |
1988-12-06 | Published for Opposition |
1989-06-29 | Abandon |
1989-06-29 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
1989-06-29 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | PRINZ INTERNATIONAL LTD. |
Address | SHINTAISO KAWANABE BLDG. 700 22-12 DOGENZAKA 1-CHOME SHIBUYA-KU, TOKYO JP |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | JP |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 026 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | CAMERAS, LENSES, TELEPHOTO LENSES, ZOOM LENSES, WIDE ANGLE LENSES, FISH-EYE LENSES, LENS FILTERS, LENS HOOD, LENS CAPS AND LENS CASE |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1980-04-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1980-08-27 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1980-09-29 | 3 CNSL F:First Action |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1983-04-21 | 4 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1983-06-20 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1983-10-01 | 6 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1984-04-02 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1984-05-25 | 8 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1984-11-20 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1985-03-13 | 10 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1985-09-11 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1985-10-21 | 12 CNSL O:Outgoing Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1986-03-19 | 13 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1986-09-08 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1986-09-23 | 15 CNSL O:Outgoing Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1987-03-25 | 16 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1987-09-25 | 17 CNSL O:Outgoing Correspondence |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 1988-03-30 | 18 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1988-07-11 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1988-08-12 | 20 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1988-11-05 | 21 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1988-11-19 | 22 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1988-12-06 | 23 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 1989-02-15 | 24 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 1989-02-15 | 25 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 1989-06-19 | 26 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 1989-06-29 | 27 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.