N-RICH
Sanna Dairies, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 72244429 |
| Registration Number | 0834504 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Alan S. Nemes |
| Attorney Docket Number | 500627.684 |
Timeline
| 1956-10-11 | Date of First Use |
| 1966-04-27 | Application Filed |
| 1967-06-29 | Amend to Register |
| 1967-08-29 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-08-29 | Renewal Date |
| 2007-11-21 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2009-02-05 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  SANNA DAIRIES, INC. |
| Address | MADISON WI |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 29 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| PM0001 | ENRICH |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | 1987-03-30 | 1 9.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 20 YRS) | 1987-08-29 | 2 REN1 R:Renewal |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2007-07-18 | 3 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2007-08-03 | 4 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2007-08-03 | 5 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-08-21 | 6 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2007-08-22 | 7 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | 2007-08-24 | 8 PR89 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-09-12 | 9 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-10-01 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | 2007-10-01 | 11 PR89 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2007-11-21 | 12 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2007-11-21 | 13 RNL2 Q: |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2008-03-26 | 14 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2008-05-07 | 15 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2008-10-02 | 16 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2008-10-02 | 17 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2009-02-05 | 18 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2014-02-27 | 19 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2015-08-25 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2015-08-25 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2016-08-29 | 22 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-03-16 | 23 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 