Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 71669875 |
Registration Number | 0614558 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Scott W. Johnston |
Attorney Docket Number | 8442 |
1934-01-00 | Date of First Use |
1954-07-13 | Application Filed |
1955-10-18 | Trademark Registered |
2005-08-29 | Status: Live/Registered |
2005-10-18 | Renewal Date |
2011-08-15 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | FOODLAND, INC. |
Address | 2135 COLUMBUS ROAD CLEVELAND OH |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | MO |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 29 |
U.S. Codes: | 046 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0461 | CANNED FOODS-NAMELY, FRUITS, VEGETABLES, DECIDUOUS AND CITRUS FRUIT JUICES, VEGETABLE JUICES, BAKED BEANS WITH PORK, [ SALMON, CRAB MEAT, TUNA, SHRIMP, OYSTERS, ] SAUERKRAUT, MUSHROOMS, MIXED VEGETABLES [ AND PIMIENTOS; MARASCHINO CHERRIES; ] FRUIT PRESERVES, JAMS, JELLIES; CANE AND MAPLE SYRUP; CRANBERRY SAUCE; APPLE SAUCE; HONEY; MAYONNAISE; PEANUT BUTTER; PICKLES; SWEET PICKLE RELISH; SPAGHETTI SAUCE; [ FOOD FLAVORING EXTRACTS; ] PREPARED MUSTARD; MEAT SAUCES; OLIVES; SALAD DRESSING; [ SANDWICH SPREAD; CANDIED DILL STICKS; CANNED RAW SHELLED WALNUT HALVES; UNSHELLED MIXED NUTS; ] TOMATO CATSUP; [ TOMATO PUREE; ] TOMATO SAUCE; [ MARSHMALLOW CREME; ] MOIST COCOANUT; [ WHEAT FLOURS; ] PANCAKE PLOUR; [ DATES; RAISINS; PRUNES; ] EGG NOODLES; TEA; TEA BAGS; VINEGAR; OLEOMARGARINE; EVAPORATED MILK; [ ROLLED OATS; ] TABLE SALT; COFFEE; [ SPICES; MOLASSES; ] EGGS; [ POTTED MEAT; VIENNA SAUSAGE; SLICED DRIED ] BEEF |
Mark | Serial Number | Relationship Number |
---|---|---|
Symbol/Image | 0314869 | |
Symbol/Image | 0341785 |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 20 YRS) | 1975-10-18 | 1 REN1 R:Renewal |
REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | 1995-11-24 | 2 9.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | 1996-02-06 | 3 PRA9 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | 1996-07-10 | 4 RRPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 1997-01-15 | 5 RNL2 Q: |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2005-02-08 | 6 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2005-02-08 | 7 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2005-08-06 | 8 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2005-08-29 | 9 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2005-08-29 | 10 RNL3 Q: |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-08-07 | 11 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-08-07 | 12 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2011-08-12 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2011-08-15 | 14 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2012-10-24 | 15 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-03-16 | 16 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.