To: | ZHU, Kan (ernest.chan@lhphst.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88281838 - CYNOSURE - CTM1901245 |
Sent: | September 05, 2019 04:58:29 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88281838
Mark: CYNOSURE
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: ZHU, Kan
|
|
Reference/Docket No. CTM1901245
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 05, 2019
This letter responds to applicant’s communication filed on August 2, 2019.
The translation and transliteration of the foreign wording in the mark are acceptable.
The amended identification of services is acceptable.
The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the delay in raising this issue(s).
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
• NEW ISSUES: (1) Disclaimer Required and (2) U.S.-licensed Attorney Required
• MAINTAINED ISSUES: Trademark Act Section 2(d) Refusal to Register – Likelihood of Confusion
In this case, applicant must disclaim the non-Latin characters that transliterate to DICHAN because it is not inherently distinctive. These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “the non-Latin characters that transliterate to DICHAN” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
U.S.-licensed Attorney Required
Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney. The application record indicates that applicant’s domicile is outside of the United States in China, but no attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. State or territory has been appointed to represent the applicant in this matter. All applicants whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is not within the United States or its territories must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o), 2.11(a). Thus, applicant is required to be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney and must appoint one. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a). This application will not proceed to registration without such appointment and representation. See id. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney. To appoint an attorney, applicant should (1) submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Revocation, Appointment, and/or Change of Address of Attorney/Domestic Representative form and (2) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that this TEAS form was submitted. Alternatively, if applicant has already retained an attorney, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).
Trademark Act Section 2(d) Refusal to Register – Likelihood of Confusion
These refusals are maintained. While applicant has deleted some services so that its identification now reads “Real estate agency services; Real estate consultancy”, these services are highly related and encompassed by the services in the registrations, including, “real estate services, namely, listing, lending, financing” and “financial valuation of personal property and real estate.” Therefore, given the similarities between the marks, these refusals are maintained.
Response Guidelines
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Leslie L. Richards/
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 106
571-272-1256
leslie.richards@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE