Composition for contraception

Spona , et al. April 16, 2

Patent Grant RE44159

U.S. patent number RE44,159 [Application Number 11/892,969] was granted by the patent office on 2013-04-16 for composition for contraception. This patent grant is currently assigned to Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft. The grantee listed for this patent is Bernd Dusterberg, Frank Ludicke, Jurgen Spona. Invention is credited to Bernd Dusterberg, Frank Ludicke, Jurgen Spona.


United States Patent RE44,159
Spona ,   et al. April 16, 2013
**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) **

Composition for contraception

Abstract

A combination product for oral contraception is disclosed comprising an estrogen selected from 2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from 0.25 to 0.30 mg of drospirenone and 0.1 to 0.2 mg of cyproterone acetate, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days.


Inventors: Spona; Jurgen (Vienna, AT), Dusterberg; Bernd (Berlin, DE), Ludicke; Frank (Basel, CH)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Spona; Jurgen
Dusterberg; Bernd
Ludicke; Frank

Vienna
Berlin
Basel

N/A
N/A
N/A

AT
DE
CH
Assignee: Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft (Berlin, DE)
Family ID: 6506206
Appl. No.: 11/892,969
Filed: August 28, 2007

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
10916600 Aug 12, 2004
10193758 Jul 12, 2002
09504084 Feb 15, 2000 Re. 37838
08268996 Jun 30, 1994 5583129
11892969
09503952 Feb 15, 2000 Re. 37564
08268996 Jun 30, 1994 5583129
Reissue of: 08742147 Oct 31, 1996 5824667 Oct 20, 1998

Foreign Application Priority Data

Dec 22, 1993 [DE] P 43 44 462
Current U.S. Class: 514/170
Current CPC Class: A61P 15/08 (20180101); A61K 31/58 (20130101); A61P 15/18 (20180101); A61K 31/57 (20130101); A61K 31/565 (20130101); A61K 31/567 (20130101); A61P 43/00 (20180101); A61K 31/565 (20130101); A61K 2300/00 (20130101); A61K 31/57 (20130101); A61K 2300/00 (20130101); A61K 31/58 (20130101); A61K 2300/00 (20130101)
Current International Class: A61K 31/565 (20060101); A61K 31/585 (20060101)

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
3639600 February 1972 Hendrix
3932635 January 1976 Segre
3939264 February 1976 Lachnit-Fixson
3969502 July 1976 Lachnit-Fixson et al.
4129564 December 1978 Wiechert et al.
4145416 March 1979 Lachnit-Fixson et al.
4826831 May 1989 Plunkett et al.
4904462 February 1990 Schulze et al.
5010070 April 1991 Boissonneault
5098714 March 1992 Wright
5108995 April 1992 Casper
5208225 May 1993 Boissonneault et al.
5256421 October 1993 Casper
5262408 November 1993 Bergink
5340584 August 1994 Spicer et al.
5418228 May 1995 Bennink
5422119 June 1995 Casper
5552394 September 1996 Hodgen
5569652 October 1996 Beier et al.
5583129 December 1996 Spona et al.
5756490 May 1998 Lachnit et al.
2001/0056086 December 2001 Habenicht
Foreign Patent Documents
55094/90 Nov 1990 AU
2016780 Jul 2000 CA
30 22 337 Jan 1982 DE
4 344 462 Dec 1993 DE
44 11 585 Oct 1995 DE
0 253 607 Jan 1988 EP
0 398 460 Nov 1990 EP
0 491 415 Jun 1992 EP
0 491 438 Jun 1992 EP
640 343 Mar 1995 EP
0 917 466 Jul 1997 EP
1 462 107 Mar 2003 EP
0 814 803 Oct 2006 EP
1 334 725 Feb 2007 EP
WO 88/00469 Jan 1988 WO
WO 95/26730 Oct 1995 WO
WO 98/04246 Feb 1998 WO
WO 98/04265 Feb 1998 WO
WO 98/04267 Feb 1998 WO
WO 98/04268 Feb 1998 WO
WO 98/04269 Feb 1998 WO

Other References

The Merck Manual, 17.sup.th edition (1999), pp. 1973-74; 1932. cited by examiner .
Cianci et al., Minerva Ginecol. (abstract), (Aug. 2007), 59(4), pp. 415.25. cited by examiner .
Kase, NG, Gender Medicine, (2009), 6, Part 1: 37-59. cited by examiner .
Translation of Minulet.RTM., 1992 du Vidal. cited by applicant .
Translation of Monevat.RTM., 1992 du Vidal. cited by applicant .
Translation of Szapiro, C.R.Ther.Pharmacol.Clin., 112, 1993, 3-7. cited by applicant .
["Corrected Citation"]: Ansbacher, Contraception, 43(2), 1991, 139-147. cited by applicant .
["Corrected Citation"]: Nardi et al., ActaEur.Fertil. 6(2), 1975, 153-165. (Abstract). cited by applicant .
Spona et al., "Gynecol Obstet Invest", 23, pp. 184-193, (1987). cited by applicant .
Jandrain et al., "Am J. Obstet Gynecol", 163, pp. 378-381, (1990). cited by applicant .
Porcile et al., "Fertility and Sterility", 55, pp. 877-881, (Abstract only) (1991). cited by applicant .
Oelkers et al., "Acta Endocrinologica", Suppl. 4, p. 71, #97, (1992) (Abstract only). cited by applicant .
Scheen et al., "Fertility and Sterility", 59, pp. 797-802, (Abstract only) (1993). cited by applicant .
Kuhnz et al., "Contraception", 48, pp. 557-575, (1993). cited by applicant .
Foster, Low-dose Monophasic and Multiphasic Oral Contraceptives: A Review of Potency, Efficacy, and Side Effects, 7(3), 1989, 205-212. cited by applicant .
Ansbacher, Contraception, 43(2), 1991, 365-371. cited by applicant .
Zacur et al., Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 1991, 365-371. cited by applicant .
Smith et al., Clinical Pharmacy, 3, 1984, 485-496. cited by applicant .
Fruzetti et al., Contraception, 63, 2001, 303-307. cited by applicant .
Bachmann et al., Contraception, 70, 2004, 191-198. cited by applicant .
Nappi et al., Contraception, 67, 2003, 355-359. cited by applicant .
Spielmann et al., Eur.J.Contracep.Repr.Health Care, 4(suppl 2), 1999, 9-15. cited by applicant .
Spielmann et al., Eur.J.Contracep.Repr.Health Care, 4(suppl 2), 1999, 17-25. cited by applicant .
Oosterbaan, Eur.J.Contracep.Repr.Health Care, 4(suppl 2), 1999, 3-8. cited by applicant .
Kuhl, Gynakologe, 25, 1992, 231-240. cited by applicant .
Elstein, Advances in Contraception, 10, 1994, 1-4. cited by applicant .
Minulet.RTM., 1992 du Vidal. cited by applicant .
Moneva.RTM., 1992 du Vidal. cited by applicant .
Szapiro, C.R.Ther.Pharmacol.Clin, 112, 1993, 3-7. cited by applicant .
Nardi et al., ActaEur.Fertil. 6(2), 1975, 153-165. cited by applicant .
Serlaly D.: "The 20 mcg ethinylestadiol and 140 mcg Desogestrell pill: sic months, multicenter study in 235 Women," 2990, June Fertil.Contracept.Sex, 18(6): 407-12. cited by applicant .
Tuimala R. et al.: "A Clinical comparison in Finland of two oral contraceptives containing 0,150 mg Desogestrel in combination with 0,020 mg or 0,030 mg ethinyiestradil," Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl, 1987, 1477:7-12. cited by applicant .
Kaplan, Cardiol.Clin. 6:475-482 (1988). cited by applicant .
Johnson, Clin.Obst. And Gynecol., 30:267-276 (1987). cited by applicant .
Elstein, M.,: "Consensus paper--Low dose contraceptive formulations: is further reduction in steroid dosage justified?" Advances in Contraception, 1994; 10:1-4. cited by applicant .
Kuhl, H.,: "Recent developments in hormonal contraception," Gynakologe (1992) 25: 231-240. (translation). cited by applicant .
Translation of EP 0398460 A2, Application No. 90250127.9, filed May 16, 1990; (pub. Nov. 1990). cited by applicant .
Translation of DE 3022337. (Jan. 1982). cited by applicant .
Nardi, M. et al, "Cyproterone Acetate--Ethinylestradiol Treatment of Hirsutism, Acne, Seborrhea and Alopecia," Insegnamento di Endocrinologia Ginecologica, Acta Eur. Fertil 6(2), Apr. 20, 1975, pp. 153-165. cited by applicant .
Excerpts (D7) from opposition to corresponding German patent 4344462; cited in oppositions against corresponding EP patent 735883. cited by applicant .
Patent and Utility Model filed Dec. 22, 1993, re DE 4344462, translation pp. 22-23. cited by applicant .
G.B. Melis, et al., Contraception, AA Comparative Study on the Effects of a Monophasic Pill Containing Desogestrel Plus 20 .PHI.g Ethinylestradiol, a Triphasic Combination Levonorgestrel and a Monophasic Combination Containing gestrodene on Coagulatory Factors@, vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 23-30 (Jan. 1991), [including abstract]. cited by applicant .
A.R. Genazzani, et al. (Ed), Progress in Gynecology and Obstetrics, AMulticenter Clinical Trial on the new Oral Contraceptive Containing 20 .PHI.g Ethinylestradiol@, Chapter 1, pp. 747-756, (1990). cited by applicant .
W. Oelkers et al., AJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism@, p. 73, pp. 837-842, (1991). cited by applicant .
W. Oelkers et al., AActa Endocrinologica@, Suppl. 4, p. 71, #97, (1992) (Abstract Only). cited by applicant .
W. Oelkers et al., AJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism@, 80, pp. 1816-1821, (1995). cited by applicant .
Elstein et al., Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie@, pp. 559-565, (1995). cited by applicant .
Schillinger et al., AArzneim.-Forsch.@, 26, pp. 2242-2245, (Abstract only), (1976). cited by applicant .
Huempel et al., Contraception@, 16, pp. 199-216 (Abstract only), (1977). cited by applicant .
Dusterberg et al., AActa Obstet Gynecol Scand, Suppl.@, pp. 27-31, (1979). cited by applicant .
Leis et al., AGeburtshilfe Frauenheilkd@, 39, pp. 54-57 (Abstract only), (1979). cited by applicant .
Duesterberg et al., AActa Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl@, (88), pp. 27-31, (1979). cited by applicant .
Klebe et al, AArch Gynecol@, 234, pp. 113-120, (Abstract only) (1983). cited by applicant .
Holdaway et al., AActa Endocrinol@, 109, 522-529, (Abstract only) (1985). cited by applicant .
Kuhl et al., AContraception@, 30, pp, 467-482, (1985). cited by applicant .
Larsson-Cohn et al., AActa Obstet Gynecol Scand@, 65, pp. 125-128, (Abstract only) (1986). cited by applicant .
Calaf-Alsina et al., AObstet Gynecol@, 69, pp. 255-258, (Abstract only) (1987). cited by applicant .
M. Elstein, AAdvances in Contraception@, 12, pp. 155-156, (1996). cited by applicant .
Foidart et al., AInt=l J. Gynecol & Obstet@, 46, Suppl. 3, p. 11, (1994). cited by applicant .
0elkers et al., AAdvances in Contraception@, 7, Suppl. 3, pp. 195-206 (1991). cited by applicant .
J. Guillebaud, Br. J. Family Planning, 12 (Stippl.), 35-43 (1987). cited by applicant .
Van Keep et al., eds. AThe Controversial Climactoric@, MTP Press Limited, 9-18 (1981). cited by applicant .
German Pharmacopeia, 9th Edition, 1986--English Translation. cited by applicant .
Bilotta et al., "Multicenter clinical trial on the new oral contraceptive containing 20 .mu.g ethinylestradiol," Progress in Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mar. 1989, pp. 747-756. cited by applicant .
Petersen et al., "Effects of monophasic low-dose oral contraceptive on fibrin formation and resolution in young women," Hemostatic balance during oral contraception, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecoll, vol. 168, No. 1, part 1, pp. 32-38, Jan. 1993. cited by applicant .
Fioretti et al., "Clinical and metabolic study of a new pill containing 20 mcg Ethinylestradiol plus 0.150 mg Desogestrel," Contraception, 1987, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 229-243. cited by applicant .
Losert et al., "Progestogens with Antimineralocorticold Activity," Arzneim.-Forsch./ Drug Res. 35, 1985, No. 2, pp. 459-471. cited by applicant .
Wang et al., "Treatment of premenstrual sydrome by spironolactone: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study," Acta Obstet.Gynecol.Scand., 74: 803-808 (1995). cited by applicant .
Muhn, P. et al., "Drosplrenone: A Novel Progestogen with Antimineralocorticoid and Antiandrogenic Activity," Annals New York Acad. Sciences, 761:311-35 (1995). cited by applicant .
Nickisch et al., "Aldosterone Antagonists. 4. Synthesis and Activities of Steroidal 6,6-Ethylene-15,16-methylene 17-Spiroiactones," J.Med.Chem., 34:2964-2968 (1991). cited by applicant .
Laurent, H. et al., "Synthesis and Activities of Anti-Aldosterones," Steroid Biochem., 19:771-776 (1983). cited by applicant .
Casals-Stenzel, J. et al., "The Renal Action of Spriorenone and other 6.beta.,7.beta.; 15.beta., 16.beta.-dimethylene-17-spriolactones, a new type of steriodal aldosterone antagonists," Arzeneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 34:241-246 (1984). cited by applicant .
Pollow, K. et al, "Dihydrospirorenone (ZK30595): A Novel Progestagen--Characterization of Binding to Different Receptor Proteins," Contraception 46:561-754 (1992). cited by applicant .
McInnes et al., J. Clinical Pharmacology, 22:410-17, 410-11, 1982. cited by applicant .
K. Fotherby, Contraception, 54:59-69, 61, 1996. cited by applicant .
J.C. Chaumeil, Meth, Find Exp. Clin, Pharm., 20(3):211-215, 211, 1998. cited by applicant .
Hess et al., Acta Pharmaceutica Technologica, 21(4) :245-54, 254, 1975. cited by applicant .
Shah et al., Pharm. Tech. 152-60, 152, 1994. cited by applicant .
Spona et al., "Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development" Contraception 54, 71-77, 1996. cited by applicant .
J.O. Drife, "Oral contraception for the over 40s," Annual Progress in Reproductive Medicine, 1993. cited by applicant .
Fitzgerald et al., "A comparison of the effects oftwo monophasic lo dose oral contraceptives on the inhibition of ovulation," Advances in Contraception 10, 5-18, 1994. cited by applicant .
Endrikat et al., "A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two lo-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 .mu.g ethinylestradiol / 75 .mu.g gestodene and 30 .mu.g ethinylestradiol / 75 .mu.g gestodene, with respect to efficacy, cacyle control, and tolerance," Contraception 55, 131-137, 1997. cited by applicant .
Sullivan et al., "Effect of 21-day and 24-day oral contraceptive regimens containing gestodene (60 .mu.g (and ethinyl estradiol (15 .mu.g) on ovarian activity," Fertility and Sterility 72, 1, 115-120, 1999. cited by applicant .
Endrikat et al., "Double-blind, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day versus a 21-day low-dose oral contraceptive regimen containing 20 .mu.g ethinyl estradiol and 75 .mu.g gestodene," Contraception 69, 2, 99-105, 2001. cited by applicant .
Elomaa et al., "Ovulatory potential of preovulatory sized follicles during oral contraceptive treatment," Contraception 60, 275-279, 1999. cited by applicant .
Krattenmacher et al., "Effects of drospirenone on blood pressure and heart rate in rats measured by highly sensitive radio-telemetry," XVII Meeting I.S.G.S.H. Nov. 25-28, 1995, p. 55. cited by applicant .
Filshie et al., (ed.); Book: Contraception: Science and Practice; Chapter: Practical Prescribing of the Combined Oral Conraceptive Pill; Section: The Paramount Importance of the Pill-free Interval; Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 76-82, 1989. cited by applicant .
German Pharmacopeia, 9th Edition, 1986--English Translation, p. 105. cited by applicant .
Martindale, The Extra Phamacopoeia, Edited by James E.F. Reynolds, pp. 2003-2004, Thirtieth Ed. (1993). cited by applicant .
AHFS Drug Information 33, p. 2348, (1993). cited by applicant .
Drug Information of the Health Care Professional, vol. 1, USP DI 1993, 13.sup.th Edition, Chapter 50. cited by applicant .
Pearlstein et al., "Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder with a new drospirenone--containing oral contraceptive formulation." Presented at the 60.sup.th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, Oct. 20, 2004, pp. 1-26. cited by applicant .
Filshie et al. (ed.); Book: Contraception: Science and Practice; Chapter: Practical Prescribing of the Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill; Section: The Paramount Inportance of the Pill-free Interval; Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 76-82, 1989. cited by applicant .
Chemical Abstracts 76:30782, Craft et al., 1971. cited by applicant .
Facts & Comparisons, (1985), pp. 108c-108e. cited by applicant .
Lammers et al., Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 70(6), pp. 497-500 (1991). cited by applicant .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics vol. 245, No. 1-4, 1989. cited by applicant .
Elger et al., "Conception and pharmacodynamic profile of drospirenone." (Steroids) 2003, 891-905, 68. cited by applicant .
Gladwell, M. "John Rock's Error." (The New Yorker). Mar. 13, 2000, 52-63. cited by applicant .
Sulak, P.J., et al., "Extended Regimen Oral Contraceptives--Practical Management," Clinical Update--Supplemental to OBG Management, Jan. 2007, S1-S8. cited by applicant .
Willis, S.A., et al., "Greater inhibition of the pituitary--ovarian axis in oral contraceptive regimens with a shortened hormone-free interval," Contraception 74(2006), pp. 100-103. cited by applicant .
Hayes, J.L., et al., "A Pilot Clinical Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel IUS," Contraception/Family Planning, vol. 107, No. 4 (Supplement), Apr. 2006--1 page. cited by applicant .
Notice of Certification Under 21 U.S.C. .sctn. 355(j)(2)(B) (.sctn. 505(j)(B)) of Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act) and 21 C.F.R. .sctn. 314.95)--Sandoz Inc.'s Drospirenone; Ethinyl Estradiol Tablet, 3 mg; 0.02 mg--Sandoz Inc.'s ANDA 79-221, pp. 1-43. cited by applicant .
Dinger, J., et al., Abstract #236, p. S104, Abstracts of the 24.sup.th ICPE, Pharmaco-epidemiology and Drug Safety 2008: 17: SI-S294. cited by applicant .
Runnebaum, B et al., "New progestogens in oral contraceptives," Am J Obstet Gynecol, Oct. 1987, vol. 157, pp. 1059-1063. cited by applicant .
Kuhl, H., "Pharmacokinetics of oestrogens and progestogens," Maturitas, 1990, vol. 12, pp. 171-197. cited by applicant .
Bayer Healthcare, Patient Information Booklet for Angeliq film coated tablets, May 2008, pp. 1-12. cited by applicant .
Kilogest, Consumer Medicine Information, Dec. 2006, pp. 1-3. cited by applicant .
Landgren, B. M. et al., "The effect on follicular growth and luteal function of `missing the pill`: A comparison between a monophasic and a triphasic combined oral contraceptive," Contraception, Feb. 1991, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 149-159. cited by applicant .
Killick, S. R. et al., "Extending the duration of the pill-free interval during combined oral contraception," Advances in Contraception, 1990, vol. 6, pp. 33-40. cited by applicant .
Letterie, G. S., Effect of "Missed" Pills on Oral Contraceptive Effectiveness, Jun. 1992, vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 979-982. cited by applicant .
Shaw, Geoffrey et al., "Assessment of ovarian activity in a gestodene containing triphasic oral contraceptive," the British Journal of Family Planning, 1992, vol. 18, pp. 76-78. cited by applicant .
Bye, P. et al., "`Missed Pill` conception: fact or fiction?" Bristish Medical Journal, Jun. 22, 1985, vol. 290, pp. 1905. cited by applicant .
Brenner, P. F. et al., "Serum levels of d-norgestrel, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone in women during and following ingestion of combination oral contraceptives containing dl-norgestrel," Am J Obstet Gynecol, Sep. 15, 1977, pp. 133-140. cited by applicant .
Molley et al., "`Missed Pill` conception: fact of fiction?" British Medical Journal, vol. 290, May 18, 1985, pp. 1474-1475. cited by applicant .
Andreasen, E. E. et al., "Progesterone and gestagen treatment. Pharmacologic and clinical aspects," Ugeskrift for Laeger, Aug. 7, vol. 151, No. 32, pp. 2021-2026 Abstract only. cited by applicant .
Spona, J. et al., "Pharmacological and endocrine profiles of gestodene," Int. J. Fertil., 1987, 32 Suppl: 6-14. cited by applicant .
Spona, J et al., "Inhibition of ovulation by a triphasic gestodene-containing oral contraceptive," Advances in Contraception, 1993, vol. 9, pp. 187-194. cited by applicant .
Nakajima, S. J. et al., "Efficacy and safety of a new 24-day oral contraceptive regimen of norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 .mu.g (Loestrin 24 Fe)," Contraception, 2007, vol. 75, pp. 16-22. cited by applicant .
Schneider, W. H. F. et al., "Experimental and Clinical Data on Cyclabil," Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1977, Suppl 65, pp. 39-43. cited by applicant .
Theramex, "Estroprogestative Contraception Composition," Publication Date: Feb. 14, 2007, Retrieved from espacenet.com on May 28, 2010; English Abstract of EP 1 334 725. cited by applicant .
G.B. Melis, et al., Contraception, "A Comparative Study on the Efects of a Monophasic Pill Containing Desogestrel Plus 20 .mu.g Ethinylestradiol, a Triphasic Combination Containing Levonorgestrel and a Monophasic Combination Containign gestrodene on Coagulatory Factors", vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 23-30 (Jan. 1991), [including abstract]. cited by applicant .
A. R. Genazzani, et al. (Ed), Progress in Gynecology and Obstetrics, "Multicenter Clinical Trial on the new Oral Contaceptive Containing 20 .mu.g Ethinylestradiol", Chapter 1, pp. 747-756, (1990). cited by applicant .
PCT Search Report dated May 12, 1995. cited by applicant .
Parke Davis package insert for Loestrin, Jun. 1993. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Spivack; Phyllis G.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, PC

Parent Case Text



.[.This.]. .Iadd.Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,667: this Ser. No. 11/892,969 continuation reissue application is a divisional of reissue application Ser. No. 10/916,600 of Aug. 12, 2004 now abandoned, which is a continuation of reissue application Ser. No. 10/193,758 filed Jul. 12, 2002, now abandoned, which is a continuation of reissue application Ser. No. 09/504,084, filed Feb. 15, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 37,838, which is a reissue of application Ser. No. 08/742,147, filed Oct. 31, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,667, which .Iaddend.is a continuation of the application Ser. No. 08/268,996 filed Jun. 30, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,129.Iadd.; and reissue application Ser. No. 10/080,617, filed on Feb. 25, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 38,253, is a continuation of reissue application Ser. No. 09/503,952, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 37,564, which also is a reissue of application Ser. No. 08/742,147, filed Oct. 31, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,667, which is a continuation of the application Ser. No. 08/268,996, filed Jun. 30, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,129; and a continuation reissue application of Ser. No. 10/916,600 has been filed, on Mar. 24, 2006, having Ser. No. 11/388,172.Iaddend..
Claims



We claim:

.[.1. A combination product for oral contraception, comprising (a) 23 or 24 dosage units, each containing an estrogen selected from >2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from 0.25 to 0.30 mg of drospirenone and 0.1 to 0.2 mg of cyproterone acetate, and b) 5 or 4, respectively, active ingredient-free placebo pills or other indications to show that the daily administration of the 23 or 24 dosage units respectively, is to be followed by 5 or 4, respectively pill-free or placebo pill days..].

.[.2. A combination preparation for oral contraception according to claim 1, wherein the estrogen is ethinylestradiol..].

.[.3. A combination preparation of claim 2, wherein the gestagen is cyproterone acetate..].

.[.4. A combination preparation of claim 2, wherein the gestagen is drospirenone..].

.[.5. A combination preparation according to claim 1, wherein the estrogen is present in a dose of 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol or an equivalent dose of 17.beta.-estradiol and the gestagen is present in a dose equivalent to 75 .mu.g of gestadene..].

.[.6. A combination preparation according to claim 1, which comprises 23 dosage units and 5 placebo pills or other indications to show that no dosage unit or a placebo pill is administered during the last 5 days of the menstrual cycle..].

.[.7. A combination preparation according to claim 1, which comprises 23 dosage units, each containing 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol and a dose of cyproterone acetate or drospirenone equivalent to 75 .mu.g of gestodene and 5 placebo pills or other indications to show that no dosage unit or a placebo pill is administered during the last 5 days of the menstrual cycle..].

.[.8. A combination preparation of claim 1, wherein the estrogen is 17.beta.-estradiol..].

.[.9. A combination preparation of claim 8, wherein the gestagen is cyproterone acetate..].

.[.10. A combination preparation of claim 8, wherein the gestagen is drospirenone..].

.Iadd.11. A method of inducing contraception in a female of reproductive age who has not yet reached premenopause, comprising administering to said female a monophasic composition that effectively lessens premenstrual syndrome, comprising 0.015 to 0.020 mg of ethynylestradiol and 1-3 mg of drospirenone, wherein the composition is administered for 23 or 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.12. A method of claim 11 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.13. A method of claim 12 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.14. A method of inducing contraception in a female of reproductive age who has not yet reached premenopause, comprising administering to said female a monophasic composition that effectively lessens breast tenderness, comprising 0.015 to 0.020 mg of ethynylestradiol and 1-3 mg of drospirenone, wherein the composition effectively lessens breast tenderness, and is administered for 23 or 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.15. A method of claim 14 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.16. A method of claim 15 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.17. A method of claim 11 wherein the composition effectively lessens breast tenderness..Iaddend.

.Iadd.18. A method of claim 17 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.19. A method of claim 18 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.20. A method of inducing contraception in a female of reproductive age suffering from premenstrual syndrome who has not yet reached premenopause, comprising administering to said female a monophasic composition comprising 0.015 to 0.020 mg of ethynylestradiol and 1-3 mg of drospirenone, wherein the composition is administered for 23 or 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.21. A method of claim 20 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.22. A method of claim 21 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.23. A method of inducing contraception in a female of reproductive age suffering from breast tenderness who has not yet reached premenopause, comprising administering to said female a monophasic composition comprising 0.015 to 0.020 mg of ethynylestradiol and 1-3 mg of drospirenone, wherein the composition is administered for 23 or 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.24. A method of claim 23 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.25. A method of claim 24 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.

.Iadd.26. A method of claim 20 wherein the female of reproductive age suffers from breast tenderness..Iaddend.

.Iadd.27. A method of claim 26 wherein the amount of ethynylestradiol is 0.020 mg and the amount of drospirenone is 3 mg..Iaddend.

.Iadd.28. A method of claim 27 wherein the composition is administered for 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle, followed by 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle..Iaddend.
Description



DESCRIPTION

This invention relates to the common use of estrogens and gestagens for the production of a combination preparation for oral contraception and a corresponding pack containing this combination preparation.

Combination preparations for oral contraception are already known, for example, Femovan.RTM. [DE-PS 2 546 062] or Marvelon.RTM. [DE-OS 2 361 120]. These preparations consist of 21 active ingredient-containing (estrogen/gestagen) dosage units and 7 active ingredient-free coated tablets (sugar pills; placebos). The dose to be administered daily is uniformly high in each case (so-called single-phase preparations) and produces the desired contraceptive effect in the entire intake period and in the intake pause or during the intake of the placebos. In most preparations, a 7-day interruption of the intake of active ingredient-containing dosage units was considered necessary until quite recently to trigger a reliable withdrawal bleeding and thus to achieve a satisfactory cycle control.

Other preparations, which exhibit more than 21 dosage units containing an estrogenic and progestational active ingredient, and in which the intake pause is partially (Ijzerman, Pasquale) or completely (Kuhl) bridged over by estrogen-containing dosage units. In this case, it is possible that the synthetic estrogen ethinylestradiol otherwise contained in oral contraceptives is replaced partially or completely by a conjugated estrogen, preferably estradiol.

A combination preparation for substitution therapy and contraception for females before menopause (approximately starting from the 40th year of life) is known from EP-A-0 253 607. This combination preparation contains an estrogen from the group 17.beta.-Estradiol, ethinylestradiol and mestranol as well as a gestagen from the group levonorgestrel, gestodene, desogestrel, 3-ketodesogestrel and norethindrone.

A thus selected composition is to offset hormonal irregularities in the transition phase of premenopause and to help alleviate the symptoms caused by the hormonal changeover of the female organism in this phase. Such a composition simultaneously assures a premenopausal female the contraceptive protection still necessary at this age.

The development of new oral contraceptives for females of reproductive age before premenopause was characterized during the last twenty years above all by the reduction of the estrogen and gestagen dosages.

The reduction of the daily hormone dose was connected with the expectation to minimize the frequency of undesired side effects. Epidemiological data collected in the meantime confirm the desired trend toward better compatibility of lower-dosed preparations relative to cardiovascular complications [(1.) Thorogood, M., Oral Contraceptives and Cardiovascular Disease: An Epidemiologic Overview; Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 2: 3-16 (1993); (2.) Gerstman, B. B.; Piper, J. M.; Tomita, D. K.; Ferguson, W. J.; Stadel, B. V.; Lundin, F. E.; Oral Contraceptive Estrogen Dose and the Risk of Deep Venous Thromboembolic Disease, Am. J. E., Vol. 133, No. 1, 32-36 (1991); (3.) Lidegaard, O., Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study; BMJ Vol. 306, 956-63 (1993); (4.) Vessey, M.; Mant, D.; Smith, A.; Yeates, D.; Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: findings in a large prospective study; BMJ, Vol. 292, (1986); (5.) Mishell, D. R., Oral Contraception: Past, Present and Future Perspectives; Int. J. Fertil., 36 Suppl., 7-18 (1991)].

It is assumed that a correlation exists above all between the level of the estrogen dose and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. But the maintenance of the contraceptive effectiveness stands in the way of an extreme reduction of the daily estrogen dose. Although the ovulation-inhibiting effect of the low-dosed oral contraceptives is caused mainly by the gestagenic component, the estrogenic component also makes a significant contribution to the central inhibition action and to the ovarian suppression (ovulation inhibition). Moreover, the daily estrogen dose must not fall below the minimum dose ranges, so that a satisfactory cycle control can be assured (Der Frauenarzt [The Gynecologist]; 34, 7: 793 (1993)].

The lowest estrogen dose contained in an oral contraceptive on the market at this time is 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol, combined with 150 .mu.g of desogestrel (Mercilon). Although the cycle control of this preparation is, as expected, somewhat poorer in comparison to preparations with a higher estrogen dose, the high acceptance rate of Mercilon indicates a small clinical relevance of this drawback. But the observation, made identically in several studies, of a lesser ovarial suppression of the preparation containing 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol represents a clinically important problem. Obviously with this very low estrogen dose, in the case of many females, the maturation of follicles, which could be detected with ultrasonic studies or hormonal studies, results [(6.) Lunell, N. O.; Carlstrom, K.; Zador, G.; Ovulation inhibition with a combined oral contraceptive containing 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol and 250 .mu.g of levonorgestrel; Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. Suppl. 88: 17-21 (1979); (7.) Mall-Haefeli, M.; Werner-Zodrow, I.; Huber, P. R.; Klinische Erfahrungen mit Mercilon und Marvelon unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Ovar-Funktion [Clinical Experience with Mercilon and Marvelon under special consideration of the ovary function]; Geburtsh. und Frauenheilk. [Obstetrics and Gynecology] 51, 35-38, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart-New York (1991); (8.) Strobel, E., Behandlung mit oralen Kontrazeptiva [Treatment with Oral Contraceptives]; Fortschr. Med. Vol. 110, No. 20 (1992); (9.) Letter to Editor, Contraception 45: 519-521 (1992); (10.) Teichmann, A. T.; Brill, K.; Can Dose Reduction of Ethinylestradiol in OCs Jeopardize Ovarian Suppression and Cycle Control? Abstract Book, VIIIth World Congress on Human Reproduction, Bali, Indonesia (1993)].

The hormone determinations performed showed that functional granulosa cells that secrete 17.beta.-estradiol are involved. Each intake error in the case of females with clear ovarian activity, thus with follicular maturations, can result in a quick increase of gonadotropin production. The requirements for an ovulation would thus be present. It is estimated that approximately one third of females take oral contraceptives irregularly within one year of use (Gynpress, Volume 1, No. 3, 1990). The risk of a pregnancy is therefore high especially in the case of intake errors with the 20 .mu.g ethinylestradiol preparations.

The object of this invention is an improved single-phase combination preparation for a female of reproductive age, who is not yet in premenopause, containing an estrogen and gestagen in each individual dosage unit, with the lowest possible estrogen content in each individual dosage unit, but also with a low total hormone content per administration cycle.

It has now been found that a pronounced ovarian suppression without frequent follicular maturations with low daily estrogen dosage, low total estrogen as well as low total hormone amount per administration cycle can be achieved by the use of a composition comprising an estrogen selected from 2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.015 to 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from 0.05 to 0.075 mg of gestodene, 0.075 to 0.125 mg of levonorgestrel, 0.06 to 0.15 mg of desogestrel, 0.06 to 0.15 mg of 3-ketodesogestrel, .[.0.1 to 0.3.]. .Iadd.1 to 3 .Iaddend.mg of drospirenone, .[.0.1 to 0.2.]. .Iadd.1 to 2 .Iaddend.mg of cyproterone acetate, 0.2 to 0.3 mg of norgestimate and >0.35 to 0.75 mg of norethisterone. for the production of a form of dosage for contraception for a female of reproductive age, who has not yet reached premenopause, by administration of the form of dosage for 23 or 24 days, beginning on day one of the menstrual cycle (first day of menstrual bleeding), followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days, during a total of 28 days in the administration cycle.

The terms "premenopause" and "menopause" are used within the scope of this invention in the meaning of the conventional definition, see, for example, "The Controversial Climacteric," P. A. of Keep et al., Ed., MTP press (1981), e.g., p. 9.

The daily hormone dose is kept to a very low level here, while the usual 21-day intake is extended by two or three days. The remaining 5 or 4 days of a cycle are preferably bridged over by placebos, to avoid intake errors, or by 5 or 4 intake-free days.

According to a preferred embodiment of this invention, this relates to the use of a composition comprising an estrogen selected from >2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from >0.06 to 0.075 mg of gestodene, >0.100 to 0.125 mg of levonorgestrel, >0.10 to 0.15 mg of desogestrel, >0.10 to 0.15 mg of 3-ketodesogestrel, .[.0.25 to 0.30.]. .Iadd.2.5 to 3.0 .Iaddend.mg of drospirenone, .[.0.1 to 0.2.]. .Iadd.1 to 2 .Iaddend.mg of cyproterone acetate, 0.2 to 0.3. mg of norgestimate and 0.50 to 0.75 mg of norethisterone for the production of a form of dosage for contraception as described above.

In addition, this invention relates to a combination product for oral contraception, which comprises

a) 23 or 24 dosage units, each containing an estrogen selected from >2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from >0.06 to 0.075 mg of gestodene, >0.100 to 0.125 mg of levonorgestrel, >0.10 to 0.15 mg of desogestrel, >0.10 to 0.15 mg of 3-ketodesogestrel, .[.0.25 to 0.30.]. .Iadd.2.5 to 3.0 .Iaddend.mg of drospirenone, .[.0.1 to 0.2.]. .Iadd.1 to 2 .Iaddend.mg of cyproterone acetate, 0.2 to 0.3 mg of norgestimate and 0.50 to 0.75 mg of norethisterone and

b) 5 or 4 sugar pills or other indications to show that the daily administration of 23 or 24 dosage units is to be followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days are to be followed.

Further embodiments according to the invention follow from the features of the subclaims.

An especially preferred combination preparation according to this invention comprises 23 dosage units, each containing 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol and 75 .mu.g of gestodene and 5 sugar pills or other indications to show that no dosage unit or a sugar pill is administered during the last 5 days of the menstrual cycle.

The clinical study briefly described below was performed with ethinylestradiol as estrogen and gestodene as representative of the substance class of the gestagens possible according to the invention. All possible combinations of ethinylestradiol or estradiol according to the invention in the indicated dosages with one of the selected gestagens in the indicated dosages as 23- or 24-day preparations exhibit the advantages according to the invention.

The 23-day administration of 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol in combination with 75 .mu.g of gestodene results, in comparison to the 21-day administration, in a stronger ovarian suppression. In a double-placebo, randomized study on healthy females with normal ovarian function, groups of 30 test subjects each received the combination preparation either once daily over 21 or 23 days as well as placebos on 7 or 5 days (to assure the double-placebo nature of the study).

The treatment began after an ovulatory, untreated preliminary cycle on the first day of the menstrual bleeding of the subsequent cycle and extended altogether over three treatment cycles. The study was concluded with an untreated follow-up cycle.

The ovarian suppression was measured based on the level of the endogenous 17.beta.-estradiol level and the size of follicular structures. The results show that the 17.beta.-estradiol levels with 23-day intake of the test preparation were significantly lower (p<0.05) in comparison to the 21-day administration (FIG. 1).

In accordance with this finding, the number of females with follicular maturations was also clearly higher in the 21-time administration relative to the 23-time administration (FIG. 2).

The intake interval extended only by two days surprisingly produces a significantly greater ovarian suppression with unchangingly low daily doses. The combination preparation according to the invention thus achieves the effectiveness previously known for preparations with a daily content of 30 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol, although the daily ethinylestradiol dose is 33% lower and also the total dose per cycle is 27% lower.

The advantages of a combination preparation for oral contraception to be administered over 23 days relative to the usual 21-day preparations with less than 30 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol can be characterized as follows:

1. A significantly lower frequency of follicular developments in the user (maximum of 13% in females who received the 23-day preparation relative to a maximum of 40% among those who received the 21-day preparation). This means a greater contraceptive reliability of the 23-day preparation, especially in the case of previous intake errors. The danger of "breakthrough ovulations" is smaller.

2. The occurrence of large follicles of more than a 30 mm diameter is extremely rare. The development of ovarian cysts is improbable with the 23-day preparation in comparison to the 21-day preparation.

3. The recruitment of dominant follicles is suppressed in the shortened intake-free pause.

4. The endogenous 17.beta.-estradiol levels are suppressed easily controllably in the case of the majority of the users of the 23-day preparation. Clinical symptoms such as breast tenseness, premenstrual syndrome and menstrual disorders, which can be attributed to increased and greatly fluctuating estrogen levels, are observed with the 23-day preparation with clearly lower frequency.

In summary, an intake, extended by two (or three) days, of preparations containing 20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol in each daily dosage unit can produce the above-mentioned advantages, without the daily dose having to be raised to the previously largely used level of 30 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol.

The formulation of an estrogen and gestagen for the use according to the invention or for a combination preparation according to the invention takes place completely analogously as it is already known for usual oral contraceptives with 21-day intake period of the active ingredients, such as, for example, Femovan.RTM. (ethinylestradiol/gestodene) or Microgynon.RTM. (ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel).

A pack containing a combination preparation according to the invention is also designed analogously to packs for already known oral contraceptives on the market with the variation that instead of the usual 21 dosage units containing the active components, now 23 or 24 such dosage units and 5 or 4 sugar pills are present or else contain other suitable indications that 5 or 4 days are to be bridged over until continuation of the intake of active ingredient-containing dosage units.

Moreover, reference is made to the statements made in EP-A 0 253 607, especially also to the statements there for determination of equivalent amounts of ethinylestradiol and 17.beta.-estradiol, on the one hand, and various gestagens, such as levonorgestrel, desogestrel, 3-ketodesogestrel and gestodene, on the other hand.

For further details for the determination of dose equivalents of various gestagenic active ingredients, reference is made to "Probleme der Dosisfindung: Sexualhormone" [Problems of Dose-Finding: Sex Hormones]; F. Neumann et al. in "Arzneimittelforschung" (Pharmaceutical Agent Research) 27, 2a, 296-318 (1977), as well as to "Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der hormonalen Kontrazeption" [Current Developments in Hormonal Contraception]; H. Kuhl in Gynakologe" [Gynecologist) 25: 231-240 (1992).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1: Area with the 17.beta.-estradiol level in groups of 30 females, who are treated with an oral contraceptive (75 .mu.g of gestodene+20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol) in 21- or 23-day administration interval over three cycles.

FIG. 2: Number of females in %, who showed follicular developments (>13 mm diameter) with 21- or 23-day treatment with an oral contraceptive (75 .mu.g of gestodene+20 .mu.g of ethinylestradiol).

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed