Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation Patent Grant Foley , et al. March 15, 2 [Medtronic Navigation, Inc.]

Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation

Foley , et al. March 15, 2

Patent Grant RE42226

U.S. patent number RE42,226 [Application Number 11/451,595] was granted by the patent office on 2011-03-15 for percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation. This patent grant is currently assigned to Medtronic Navigation, Inc.. Invention is credited to John B Clayton, Kevin T Foley, Anthony Melkent, Michael C Sherman.

United States Patent	RE42,226
Foley , et al.	March 15, 2011

**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) **

Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation

Abstract

An apparatus and procedures for percutaneous placement of surgical implants and instruments such as, for example, screws, rods, wires and plates into various body parts using image guided surgery. The invention includes an apparatus for use with a surgical navigation system, an attaching device rigidly connected to a body part, such as the spinous process of a vertebrae, with an identification superstructure rigidly but removably connected to the attaching device. This identification superstructure, for example, is a reference arc and fiducial array which accomplishes the function of identifying the location of the superstructure, and, therefore, the body part to which it is fixed, during imaging by CAT scan or MRI, and later during medical procedures.

Inventors:	Foley; Kevin T (Germantown, TN), Clayton; John B (Superior, CO), Melkent; Anthony (Memphis, TN), Sherman; Michael C (Memphis, TN)
Assignee:	Medtronic Navigation, Inc. (Louisville, CO)
Family ID:	26739359
Appl. No.:	11/451,595
Filed:	June 12, 2006

Related U.S. Patent Documents


	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	10423332	Apr 24, 2003	Re. 39133
	60059915	Sep 24, 1997
Reissue of:	09148498	Sep 4, 1998	06226548	May 1, 2001

Current U.S. Class:	600/426
Current CPC Class:	A61B 34/20 (20160201); A61B 17/70 (20130101); A61B 17/7083 (20130101); A61B 2090/363 (20160201); A61B 2090/3983 (20160201); A61B 17/7032 (20130101); A61B 2034/2055 (20160201); A61B 2090/3945 (20160201); A61B 2034/2072 (20160201); A61B 90/11 (20160201); A61B 34/10 (20160201); A61B 2017/00477 (20130101)
Current International Class:	A61B 5/05 (20060101)
Field of Search:	;600/407,426,427,429,414,417 ;606/60,61,65,104,130 ;604/236 ;623/1.34

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


1576781	March 1926	Phillips
1735726	November 1929	Bornhardt
2407845	September 1946	Nemeyer
2650588	September 1953	Drew
2697433	December 1954	Sehnder
3016899	January 1962	Stenvall
3017887	January 1962	Heyer
3061936	November 1962	Dobbeleer
3073310	January 1963	Mocarski
3109588	November 1963	Polhemus et al.
3294083	December 1966	Alderson
3367326	February 1968	Frazier
3439256	April 1969	Kahne et al.
3577160	May 1971	White
3614950	October 1971	Rabey
3644825	February 1972	Davis, Jr. et al.
3674014	July 1972	Tillander
3702935	November 1972	Carey et al.
3704707	December 1972	Halloran
3821469	June 1974	Whetstone et al.
3868565	February 1975	Kuipers
3941127	March 1976	Froning
3983474	September 1976	Kuipers
4017858	April 1977	Kuipers
4037592	July 1977	Kronner
4052620	October 1977	Brunnett
4054881	October 1977	Raab
4058114	November 1977	Soldner
4117337	September 1978	Staats
4173228	November 1979	Van Steenwyk et al.
4182312	January 1980	Mushabac
4202349	May 1980	Jones
4209254	June 1980	Reymond et al.
4228799	October 1980	Anichkov et al.
4256112	March 1981	Kopf et al.
4259725	March 1981	Andrews et al.
4262306	April 1981	Renner
4287809	September 1981	Egli et al.
4298874	November 1981	Kuipers
4314251	February 1982	Raab
4317078	February 1982	Weed et al.
4319136	March 1982	Jinkins
4328548	May 1982	Crow et al.
4328813	May 1982	Ray
4339953	July 1982	Iwasaki
4341220	July 1982	Perry
4346384	August 1982	Raab
4358856	November 1982	Stivender et al.
4368536	January 1983	Pfeiler
4396885	August 1983	Constant
4396945	August 1983	DiMatteo et al.
4398540	August 1983	Takemura et al.
4403321	September 1983	Kruger
4418422	November 1983	Richter et al.
4419012	December 1983	Stephenson et al.
4422041	December 1983	Lienau
4431005	February 1984	McCormick
4457311	July 1984	Sorenson et al.
4485815	December 1984	Amplatz
4506676	March 1985	Duska
4543959	October 1985	Sepponen
4548208	October 1985	Niemi
4571834	February 1986	Fraser et al.
4572198	February 1986	Codrington
4583538	April 1986	Onik et al.
4584577	April 1986	Temple
4592352	June 1986	Patil
4602622	July 1986	Bar et al.
4608977	September 1986	Brown
4613866	September 1986	Blood
4617925	October 1986	Laitinen
4618978	October 1986	Cosman
4621628	November 1986	Brudermann
4625718	December 1986	Olerud et al.
4638798	January 1987	Shelden et al.
4642786	February 1987	Hansen
4645343	February 1987	Stockdale et al.
4649504	March 1987	Krouglicof et al.
4651732	March 1987	Frederick
4653509	March 1987	Oloff et al.
4659971	April 1987	Suzuki et al.
4660970	April 1987	Ferrano
4673352	June 1987	Hansen
4686997	August 1987	Oloff et al.
4688037	August 1987	Krieg
4701049	October 1987	Beckmann et al.
4705395	November 1987	Hageniers
4705401	November 1987	Addleman et al.
4706665	November 1987	Gouda
4709156	November 1987	Murphy et al.
4710708	December 1987	Rorden et al.
4719419	January 1988	Dawley
4722056	January 1988	Roberts et al.
4722336	February 1988	Kim et al.
4723544	February 1988	Moore et al.
4727565	February 1988	Ericson
RE32619	March 1988	Damadian
4733661	March 1988	Palestrant
4733969	March 1988	Case et al.
4737032	April 1988	Addleman et al.
4737794	April 1988	Jones
4737921	April 1988	Goldwasser et al.
4742356	May 1988	Kuipers
4742815	May 1988	Ninan et al.
4743770	May 1988	Lee
4743771	May 1988	Sacks et al.
4745290	May 1988	Frankel et al.
4750487	June 1988	Zanetti
4753528	June 1988	Hines et al.
4760851	August 1988	Fraser et al.
4761072	August 1988	Pryor
4764016	August 1988	Johansson
4771787	September 1988	Wurster et al.
4779212	October 1988	Levy
4782239	November 1988	Hirose et al.
4788481	November 1988	Niwa
4791934	December 1988	Brunnett
4793355	December 1988	Crum et al.
4794262	December 1988	Sato et al.
4797907	January 1989	Anderton
4803976	February 1989	Frigg et al.
4804261	February 1989	Kirschen
4805615	February 1989	Carol
4809694	March 1989	Ferrara
4821200	April 1989	Oberg
4821206	April 1989	Arora
4821731	April 1989	Martinelli et al.
4822163	April 1989	Schmidt
4825091	April 1989	Breyer et al.
4829373	May 1989	Leberl et al.
4836778	June 1989	Baumrind et al.
4838265	June 1989	Cosman et al.
4841967	June 1989	Chang et al.
4845771	July 1989	Wislocki et al.
4849692	July 1989	Blood
4860331	August 1989	Williams et al.
4862893	September 1989	Martinelli
4869247	September 1989	Howard, III et al.
4875165	October 1989	Fencil et al.
4875478	October 1989	Chen
4884566	December 1989	Mountz et al.
4889526	December 1989	Rauscher et al.
4896673	January 1990	Rose et al.
4905698	March 1990	Strohl, Jr. et al.
4923459	May 1990	Nambu
4931056	June 1990	Ghajar et al.
4943296	July 1990	Funakubo et al.
4945305	July 1990	Blood
4945914	August 1990	Allen
4951653	August 1990	Fry et al.
4955891	September 1990	Carol
4961422	October 1990	Marchosky et al.
4971069	November 1990	Gracovetsky
4977655	December 1990	Martinelli
4989608	February 1991	Ratner
4991579	February 1991	Allen
5002058	March 1991	Martinelli
5005592	April 1991	Cartmell
5013317	May 1991	Cole et al.
5016639	May 1991	Allen
5017139	May 1991	Mushabac
5027818	July 1991	Bova et al.
5030196	July 1991	Inoue
5030222	July 1991	Calandruccio et al.
5031203	July 1991	Trecha
5042486	August 1991	Pfeiler et al.
5047036	September 1991	Koutrouvelis
5050608	September 1991	Watanabe et al.
5054492	October 1991	Scribner et al.
5057095	October 1991	Fabian
5059789	October 1991	Salcudean
5078140	January 1992	Kwoh
5079699	January 1992	Tuy et al.
5080662	January 1992	Paul
5086401	February 1992	Glassman et al.
5094241	March 1992	Allen
5097839	March 1992	Allen
5098426	March 1992	Sklar et al.
5099845	March 1992	Besz et al.
5099846	March 1992	Hardy
5105829	April 1992	Fabian et al.
5107839	April 1992	Houdek et al.
5107843	April 1992	Aarnio et al.
5107862	April 1992	Fabian et al.
5109194	April 1992	Cantaloube
5119817	June 1992	Allen
5142930	September 1992	Allen et al.
5143076	September 1992	Hardy et al.
5152288	October 1992	Hoenig et al.
5160337	November 1992	Cosman
5161536	November 1992	Vilkomerson et al.
5178164	January 1993	Allen
5178621	January 1993	Cook et al.
5186174	February 1993	Schlondorff et al.
5187475	February 1993	Wagener et al.
5188126	February 1993	Fabian et al.
5190059	March 1993	Fabian et al.
5193106	March 1993	DeSena
5197476	March 1993	Nowacki et al.
5197965	March 1993	Cherry et al.
5198768	March 1993	Keren
5198877	March 1993	Schulz
5207688	May 1993	Carol
5211164	May 1993	Allen
5211165	May 1993	Dumoulin et al.
5211176	May 1993	Ishiguro et al.
5212720	May 1993	Landi et al.
5214615	May 1993	Bauer
5219351	June 1993	Teubner et al.
5222499	June 1993	Allen et al.
5224049	June 1993	Mushabac
5228442	July 1993	Imran
5230338	July 1993	Allen et al.
5230623	July 1993	Guthrie et al.
5233990	August 1993	Barnea
5237996	August 1993	Waldman et al.
5249581	October 1993	Horbal et al.
5251127	October 1993	Raab
5251635	October 1993	Dumoulin et al.
5253647	October 1993	Takahashi et al.
5255680	October 1993	Darrow et al.
5257636	November 1993	White
5257998	November 1993	Ota et al.
5261404	November 1993	Mick et al.
5265610	November 1993	Darrow et al.
5265611	November 1993	Hoenig et al.
5269759	December 1993	Hernandez et al.
5271400	December 1993	Dumoulin et al.
5273025	December 1993	Sakiyama et al.
5274551	December 1993	Corby, Jr.
5279309	January 1994	Taylor et al.
5285787	February 1994	Machida
5291199	March 1994	Overman et al.
5291889	March 1994	Kenet et al.
5295200	March 1994	Boyer
5295483	March 1994	Nowacki et al.
5297549	March 1994	Beatty et al.
5299253	March 1994	Wessels
5299254	March 1994	Dancer et al.
5299288	March 1994	Glassman et al.
5300080	April 1994	Clayman et al.
5305091	April 1994	Gelbart et al.
5305203	April 1994	Raab
5306271	April 1994	Zinreich et al.
5307072	April 1994	Jones, Jr.
5309913	May 1994	Kormos et al.
5315630	May 1994	Sturm et al.
5316024	May 1994	Hirschi et al.
5318025	June 1994	Dumoulin et al.
5320111	June 1994	Livingston
5325728	July 1994	Zimmerman et al.
5325873	July 1994	Hirschi et al.
5329944	July 1994	Fabian et al.
5330485	July 1994	Clayman et al.
5333168	July 1994	Fernandes et al.
5353795	October 1994	Souza et al.
5353800	October 1994	Pohndorf et al.
5353807	October 1994	DeMarco
5359417	October 1994	Muller et al.
5368030	November 1994	Zinreich et al.
5371778	December 1994	Yanof et al.
5375596	December 1994	Twiss et al.
5377678	January 1995	Dumoulin et al.
5383454	January 1995	Bucholz
5385146	January 1995	Goldreyer
5385148	January 1995	Lesh et al.
5386828	February 1995	Owens et al.
5389101	February 1995	Heilbrun et al.
5391199	February 1995	Ben-Haim
5394457	February 1995	Leibinger et al.
5394875	March 1995	Lewis et al.
5397329	March 1995	Allen
5398684	March 1995	Hardy
5399146	March 1995	Nowacki et al.
5400384	March 1995	Fernandes et al.
5402801	April 1995	Taylor
5408409	April 1995	Glassman et al.
5413573	May 1995	Koivukangas
5417210	May 1995	Funda et al.
5419325	May 1995	Dumoulin et al.
5423334	June 1995	Jordan
5425367	June 1995	Shapiro et al.
5425382	June 1995	Golden et al.
5426683	June 1995	O'Farrell, Jr. et al.
5426687	June 1995	Goodall et al.
5427097	June 1995	Depp
5429132	July 1995	Guy et al.
5433198	July 1995	Desai
RE35025	August 1995	Anderton
5437277	August 1995	Dumoulin et al.
5443066	August 1995	Dumoulin et al.
5443489	August 1995	Ben-Haim
5444756	August 1995	Pai et al.
5445144	August 1995	Wodicka et al.
5445150	August 1995	Dumoulin et al.
5445166	August 1995	Taylor
5446548	August 1995	Gerig et al.
5447154	September 1995	Cinquin et al.
5448610	September 1995	Yamamoto et al.
5453686	September 1995	Anderson
5456718	October 1995	Szymaitis
5457641	October 1995	Zimmer et al.
5458718	October 1995	Venkitachalam
5464446	November 1995	Dreessen et al.
5469847	November 1995	Zinreich et al.
5478341	December 1995	Cook et al.
5478343	December 1995	Ritter
5480422	January 1996	Ben-Haim
5480439	January 1996	Bisek et al.
5483961	January 1996	Kelly et al.
5484437	January 1996	Michelson
5485849	January 1996	Panescu et al.
5487391	January 1996	Panescu
5487729	January 1996	Avellanet et al.
5487757	January 1996	Truckai et al.
5490196	February 1996	Rudich et al.
5494034	February 1996	Schlondorff et al.
5503416	April 1996	Aoki et al.
5513637	May 1996	Twiss et al.
5514146	May 1996	Lam et al.
5515160	May 1996	Schulz et al.
5517990	May 1996	Kalfas et al.
5520660	May 1996	Loos et al.
5526576	June 1996	Fuchs et al.
5531227	July 1996	Schneider
5531520	July 1996	Grimson et al.
5542938	August 1996	Avellanet et al.
5543951	August 1996	Moehrmann
5546940	August 1996	Panescu et al.
5546949	August 1996	Frazin et al.
5546951	August 1996	Ben-Haim
5551429	September 1996	Fitzpatrick et al.
5558091	September 1996	Acker et al.
5566681	October 1996	Manwaring et al.
5568384	October 1996	Robb et al.
5568809	October 1996	Ben-haim
5571109	November 1996	Bertagnoli
5572999	November 1996	Funda et al.
5573533	November 1996	Strul
5575794	November 1996	Walus et al.
5575798	November 1996	Koutrouvelis
5583909	December 1996	Hanover
5588430	December 1996	Bova et al.
5590215	December 1996	Allen
5592939	January 1997	Martinelli
5595193	January 1997	Walus et al.
5596228	January 1997	Anderton et al.
5600330	February 1997	Blood
5603318	February 1997	Heilbrun et al.
5603328	February 1997	Zucker et al.
5611025	March 1997	Lorensen et al.
5617462	April 1997	Spratt
5617857	April 1997	Chader et al.
5619261	April 1997	Anderton
5622169	April 1997	Golden et al.
5622170	April 1997	Schulz
5627873	May 1997	Hanover et al.
5628315	May 1997	Vilsmeier et al.
5630431	May 1997	Taylor
5636644	June 1997	Hart et al.
5638819	June 1997	Manwaring et al.
5640170	June 1997	Anderson
5642395	June 1997	Anderton et al.
5643268	July 1997	Vilsmeier et al.
5645065	July 1997	Shapiro et al.
5646524	July 1997	Gilboa
5647361	July 1997	Damadian
5662111	September 1997	Cosman
5664001	September 1997	Tachibana et al.
5674296	October 1997	Bryan et al.
5676673	October 1997	Ferre et al.
5681260	October 1997	Ueda et al.
5682886	November 1997	Delp et al.
5682890	November 1997	Kormos et al.
5690108	November 1997	Chakeres
5694945	December 1997	Ben-Haim
5695500	December 1997	Taylor et al.
5695501	December 1997	Carol et al.
5697377	December 1997	Wittkampf
5702406	December 1997	Vilsmeier et al.
5711299	January 1998	Manwaring et al.
5713946	February 1998	Ben-Haim
5715822	February 1998	Watkins
5715836	February 1998	Kliegis et al.
5718241	February 1998	Ben-Haim et al.
5727552	March 1998	Ryan
5727553	March 1998	Saad
5729129	March 1998	Acker
5730129	March 1998	Darrow et al.
5730130	March 1998	Fitzpatrick et al.
5732703	March 1998	Kalfas et al.
5735278	April 1998	Hoult et al.
5738096	April 1998	Ben-Haim
5740802	April 1998	Nafis et al.
5741214	April 1998	Ouchi et al.
5742394	April 1998	Hansen
5744953	April 1998	Hansen
5748767	May 1998	Raab
5749362	May 1998	Funda et al.
5749835	May 1998	Glantz
5752513	May 1998	Acker et al.
5755725	May 1998	Druais
RE35816	June 1998	Schulz
5758667	June 1998	Slettenmark
5762064	June 1998	Polvani
5767669	June 1998	Hansen et al.
5767960	June 1998	Orman
5769789	June 1998	Wang et al.
5769843	June 1998	Abela et al.
5769861	June 1998	Vilsmeier
5772594	June 1998	Barrick
5772661	June 1998	Michelson
5775322	July 1998	Silverstein et al.
5776064	July 1998	Kalfas et al.
5782765	July 1998	Jonkman
5787886	August 1998	Kelly et al.
5792055	August 1998	McKinnon
5792147	August 1998	Evans et al.
5795294	August 1998	Luber et al.
5797849	August 1998	Vesely et al.
5799055	August 1998	Peshkin et al.
5799099	August 1998	Wang et al.
5800352	September 1998	Ferre et al.
5800535	September 1998	Howard, III
5802719	September 1998	O'Farrell, Jr. et al.
5803089	September 1998	Ferre et al.
5807252	September 1998	Hassfeld et al.
5810008	September 1998	Dekel et al.
5810728	September 1998	Kuhn
5810735	September 1998	Halperin et al.
5820553	October 1998	Hughes
5823192	October 1998	Kalend et al.
5823958	October 1998	Truppe
5828725	October 1998	Levinson
5828770	October 1998	Leis et al.
5829444	November 1998	Ferre et al.
5831260	November 1998	Hansen
5833608	November 1998	Acker
5834759	November 1998	Glossop
5836954	November 1998	Heilbrun et al.
5840024	November 1998	Taniguchi et al.
5840025	November 1998	Ben-Haim
5843076	December 1998	Webster, Jr. et al.
5848967	December 1998	Cosman
5851183	December 1998	Bucholz
5865846	February 1999	Bryan et al.
5868674	February 1999	Glowinski et al.
5868675	February 1999	Henrion et al.
5871445	February 1999	Bucholz
5871455	February 1999	Ueno
5871487	February 1999	Warner et al.
5873822	February 1999	Ferre et al.
5882304	March 1999	Ehnholm et al.
5884410	March 1999	Prinz
5889834	March 1999	Vilsmeier et al.
5891034	April 1999	Bucholz
5891157	April 1999	Day et al.
5904691	May 1999	Barnett et al.
5907395	May 1999	Schulz et al.
5913820	June 1999	Bladen et al.
5920395	July 1999	Schulz
5921992	July 1999	Costales et al.
5923727	July 1999	Navab
5928248	July 1999	Acker
5938603	August 1999	Ponzi
5938694	August 1999	Jaraczewski et al.
5947980	September 1999	Jensen et al.
5947981	September 1999	Cosman
5950629	September 1999	Taylor et al.
5951475	September 1999	Gueziec et al.
5951571	September 1999	Audette
5954647	September 1999	Bova et al.
5957844	September 1999	Dekel et al.
5964796	October 1999	Imran
5967980	October 1999	Ferre et al.
5967982	October 1999	Barnett
5968047	October 1999	Reed
5971997	October 1999	Guthrie et al.
5976156	November 1999	Taylor et al.
5980535	November 1999	Barnett et al.
5983126	November 1999	Wittkampf
5987349	November 1999	Schulz
5987960	November 1999	Messner et al.
5999837	December 1999	Messner et al.
5999840	December 1999	Grimson et al.
6001130	December 1999	Bryan et al.
6006126	December 1999	Cosman
6006127	December 1999	Van Der Brug et al.
6013087	January 2000	Adams et al.
6014580	January 2000	Blume et al.
6016439	January 2000	Acker
6019725	February 2000	Vesely et al.
6024695	February 2000	Taylor et al.
6050724	April 2000	Schmitz et al.
6059718	May 2000	Taniguchi et al.
6063022	May 2000	Ben-Haim
6071288	June 2000	Carol et al.
6073043	June 2000	Schneider
6076008	June 2000	Bucholz
6096050	August 2000	Audette
6104944	August 2000	Martinelli
6118845	September 2000	Simon et al.
6122538	September 2000	Sliwa, Jr. et al.
6122541	September 2000	Cosman et al.
6131396	October 2000	Duerr et al.
6139183	October 2000	Graumann
6147480	November 2000	Osadchy et al.
6149592	November 2000	Yanof et al.
6156067	December 2000	Bryan et al.
6161032	December 2000	Acker
6165181	December 2000	Heilbrun et al.
6167296	December 2000	Shahidi
6172499	January 2001	Ashe
6174330	January 2001	Stinson
6175756	January 2001	Ferre et al.
6178345	January 2001	Vilsmeier et al.
6194639	February 2001	Botella et al.
6201387	March 2001	Govari
6203497	March 2001	Dekel et al.
6211666	April 2001	Acker
6223067	April 2001	Vilsmeier
6233476	May 2001	Strommer et al.
6236875	May 2001	Bucholz et al.
6246231	June 2001	Ashe
6259942	July 2001	Westermann et al.
6273896	August 2001	Franck et al.
6285902	September 2001	Kienzle, III et al.
6298262	October 2001	Franck et al.
6314310	November 2001	Ben-Haim et al.
6332089	December 2001	Acker et al.
6341231	January 2002	Ferre et al.
6348058	February 2002	Melkent et al.
6351659	February 2002	Vilsmeier
6381485	April 2002	Hunter et al.
6424856	July 2002	Vilsmeier et al.
6427314	August 2002	Acker
6428547	August 2002	Vilsmeier et al.
6434415	August 2002	Foley et al.
6437567	August 2002	Schenck et al.
6445943	September 2002	Ferre et al.
6470207	October 2002	Simon et al.
6474341	November 2002	Hunter et al.
6478802	November 2002	Kienzle, III et al.
6484049	November 2002	Seeley et al.
6490475	December 2002	Seeley et al.
6493573	December 2002	Martinelli et al.
6498944	December 2002	Ben-Haim et al.
6499488	December 2002	Hunter et al.
6516046	February 2003	Frohlich et al.
6527443	March 2003	Vilsmeier et al.
6551325	April 2003	Neubauer et al.
6584174	June 2003	Schubert et al.
6609022	August 2003	Vilsmeier et al.
6611700	August 2003	Vilsmeier et al.
6640128	October 2003	Vilsmeier et al.
6694162	February 2004	Hartlep
6701179	March 2004	Martinelli et al.
2001/0007918	July 2001	Vilsmeier et al.
2002/0095081	July 2002	Vilsmeier
2004/0024309	February 2004	Ferre et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


964149	Mar 1975	CA
3042343	Jun 1982	DE
35 08730	Mar 1985	DE
37 17 871	May 1987	DE
38 38011	Nov 1988	DE
3831278	Mar 1989	DE
42 13 426	Apr 1992	DE
42 25 112	Jul 1992	DE
4233978	Apr 1994	DE
197 15 202	Apr 1997	DE
197 15 202	Apr 1997	DE
197 47 427	Oct 1997	DE
197 51 761	Nov 1997	DE
198 32 296	Jul 1998	DE
10085137	Nov 2002	DE
0018166	Apr 1980	EP
0 018 166	Apr 1980	EP
0 062 941	Mar 1982	EP
0 119 660	Sep 1984	EP
0 155 857	Jan 1985	EP
0319844	Jan 1988	EP
0 359 733	May 1988	EP
0359773	May 1988	EP
0 326 768	Dec 1988	EP
0 326 768	Dec 1988	EP
0419729	Sep 1989	EP
0350996	Jan 1990	EP
0651968	Aug 1990	EP
0 427 358	Oct 1990	EP
0 427 358	Oct 1990	EP
0 501 993	Nov 1990	EP
0501993	Nov 1990	EP
0 456 103	May 1991	EP
0 456 103	Jul 1991	EP
0 469 966	Jul 1991	EP
0581704	Jul 1993	EP
0655138	Aug 1993	EP
0894473	Jan 1995	EP
0469966	Aug 1995	EP
0 908 146	Oct 1998	EP
0 930 046	Oct 1998	EP
2417970	Feb 1979	FR
2 618 211	Jul 1987	FR
2 094 590	Feb 1982	GB
2 164 856	Oct 1984	GB
61-94639	Oct 1984	JP
62-327	Jun 1985	JP
63-240851	Mar 1987	JP
3-267054	Mar 1990	JP
2765738	Jun 1998	JP
WO 88/09151	Dec 1988	WO
WO 89/05123	Jun 1989	WO
WO 90/05494	Nov 1989	WO
WO 91/03982	Apr 1991	WO
WO 91/04711	Apr 1991	WO
WO 91/07726	May 1991	WO
WO 92/03090	Mar 1992	WO
WO 92/06645	Apr 1992	WO
WO 94/04938	Mar 1994	WO
WO 95/07055	Sep 1994	WO
WO 94/23647	Oct 1994	WO
WO 94/24933	Nov 1994	WO
WO 96/11624	Apr 1995	WO
WO 96/32059	Nov 1995	WO
WO 96/11624	Apr 1996	WO
WO 96/32059	Oct 1996	WO
WO 97/49453	Jun 1997	WO
WO 97/36192	Oct 1997	WO
WO 97/40764	Nov 1997	WO
WO 99/23956	Nov 1997	WO
WO 98/08554	Mar 1998	WO
WO 98/38908	Sep 1998	WO
WO 99/15097	Sep 1998	WO
WO 99/21498	Oct 1998	WO
WO 99/27839	Dec 1998	WO
WO 99/33406	Dec 1998	WO
WO 99/38449	Jan 1999	WO
WO 99/52094	Apr 1999	WO
WO 99/26549	Jun 1999	WO
WO 99/29253	Jun 1999	WO
WO 99/37208	Jul 1999	WO
WO 99/60939	Dec 1999	WO
WO 01/30437	May 2001	WO

Other References

Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2008 in pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,594, filed Jun. 12, 2006. cited by other .
Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2008 in pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,594, filed Jun. 12, 2006. cited by other .
Adams et al., Computer-Assisted Surgery, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, pp. 43-51, (May 1990). cited by other .
Adams et al., "Orientation Aid for Head and Neck Surgeons," Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 13, No. 4, 1992, pp. 409-424. cited by other .
Barrick et al., "Prophylactic Intramedullary Fixation of the Tibia for Stress Fracture in a Professional Athlete," Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 241-244 (1992). cited by other .
Barrick et al., "Technical Difficulties with the Brooker-Wills Nail in Acute Fractures of the Femur," Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 144-150 (1990). cited by other .
Barrick, "Distal Locking Screw Insertion Using a Cannulated Drill Bit: Technical Note," Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 7, No. 3, 1993, pp. 248-251. cited by other .
Batnitzky et al., "Three-Dimensinal Computer Reconstructions of Brain Lesions from Surface Contours Provided by Computed Tomography: A Prospectus," Neurosurgery, vol. 11, No. 1, Part 1, 1982, pp. 73-84. cited by other .
Benzel et al., "Magnetic Source Imaging: a Review of the Magnes System of Biomagnetic Technologies Incorporated," Neurosurgery, vol. 33, No. 2 (Aug. 1993), pp. 252-259. cited by other .
Bergstrom et al. Stereotaxic Computed Tomography, Am. J. Roentgenol, vol. 127 pp. 167-170 (1976). cited by other .
Bouazza-Marouf et al.; "Robotic-Assisted Internal Fixation of Femoral Fractures", IMECHE., pp. 51-58 (1995). cited by other .
Brack et al., "Accurate X-ray Based Navigation in Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery," CAR '98, pp. 716-722. cited by other .
Brown, R., M.D., A Stereotactic Head Frame for Use with CT Body Scanners, Investigative Radiology .COPYRGT. J.B. Lippincott Company, pp. 300-304 (Jul.-Aug. 1979). cited by other .
Bryan, "Bryan Cervical Disc System Single Level Surgical Technique", Spinal Dynamics, 2002, pp. 1-33. cited by other .
Bucholz et al., "Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localizationusing computerized tomography," Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 79, Nov. 1993, pp. 667-673. cited by other .
Bucholz, R.D., et al. Image-guided surgical techniques for infections and trauma of the central nervous system, Neurosurg. Clinics of N.A., vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 187-200 (1996). cited by other .
Bucholz, R.D., et al., A Comparison of Sonic Digitizers Versus Light Emitting Diode-Based Localization, Interactiv Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Chapter 16, pp. 179-200 (1993). cited by other .
Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative localization using a three dimensional optical digitizer, SPIE--The Intl. Soc. for Opt. Eng., vol. 1894, pp. 312-322 (Jan. 17-19, 1993). cited by other .
Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative Ultrasonic Brain Shift Monitor and Analysis, Stealth Station Marketing Brochure (2 pages) (undated). cited by other .
Bucholz, R.D., et al., The Correction of Stereotactic Inaccuracy Caused by Brain Shift Using an Intraoperative Ultrasound Device, First Joint Conference, Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery, Grenoble, France, pp. 459-466 (Mar. 19-22, 1997). cited by other .
Champleboux et al., "Accurate Calibration of Cameras and Range Imaging Sensors: the NPBS Method," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992. cited by other .
Champleboux, "Utilisation de Fonctions Splines pour la Mise au Point D'un Capteur Tridimensionnel sans Contact," Quelques Applications Medicales, Jul. 1991. cited by other .
Cinquin et al., "Computer Assisted Medical Interventions," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May/Jun. 1995, pp. 254-263. cited by other .
Cinquin et al., "Computer Assisted Medical Interventions," International Advanced Robotics Programme, Sep. 1989, pp. 63-65. cited by other .
Clarysse et al., "A Computer-Assisted System for 3-D Frameless Localization in Stereotaxic MRI," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 1991, pp. 523-529. cited by other .
Cutting M.D. et al., Optical Tracking of Bone Fragments During Craniofacial Surgery, Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 221-225, (Nov. 1995). cited by other .
Feldmar et al., "3D-2D Projective Registration of Free-Form Curves and Surfaces," Rapport de recherche (Inria Sophia Antipolis), 1994, pp. 1-44. cited by other .
Foley et al., "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics," The Systems Programming Series, Chapter 7, Jul. 1984, pp. 245-266. cited by other .
Foley et al., "Image-guided Intraoperative Spinal Localization," Intraoperative Neuroprotection, Chapter 19, 1996, pp. 325-340. cited by other .
Foley, "The StealthStation: Three-Dimensional Image-Interactive Guidance for the Spine Surgeon," Spinal Frontiers, Apr. 1996, pp. 7-9. cited by other .
Friets, E.M., et al. A Frameless Stereotaxic Operating Microscope for Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 608-617 (Jul. 1989). cited by other .
Gallen, C.C., et al., Intracranial Neurosurgery Guided by Functional Imaging, Surg. Neurol., vol. 42, pp. 523-530 (1994). cited by other .
Galloway, R.L., et al., Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 89, No. 12, pp. 1226-1231 (1992). cited by other .
Galloway, R.L., Jr. et al, Optical localization for interactive, image-guided neurosurgery, SPIE, vol. 2164, pp. 137-145 (undated. cited by other .
Germano, "Instrumentation, Technique and Technology", Neurosurgery, vol. 37, No. 2, Aug. 1995, pp. 348-350. cited by other .
Gildenberg et al., "Calculation of Stereotactic Coordinates from the Computed Tomographic Scan," Neurosurgery, vol. 10, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 580-586. cited by other .
Gomez, C.R., et al., Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Following Closed Head Injury: Vasospasm or Vasoparalysis?, Surg. Neurol., vol. 35, pp. 30-35 (1991). cited by other .
Gonzalez, "Digital Image Fundamentals," Digital Image Processing, Second Edition, 1987, pp. 52-54. cited by other .
Gottesfeld Brown et al., "Registration of Planar Film Radiographs with Computer Tomography," Proceedings of MMBIA, Jun. '96, pp. 42-51. cited by other .
Grimson, W.E.L., An Automatic Registration Method for Frameless Stereotaxy, Image Guided Surgery, and enhanced Reality Visualization, IEEE, pp. 430-436 (1994). cited by other .
Grimson, W.E.L., et al., Virtual-reality technology is giving surgeons the equivalent of x-ray vision helping them to remove tumors more effectively, to minimize surgical wounds and to avoid damaging critical tissues, Sci. Amer., vol. 280, No. 6, pp. 62-69 (Jun. 1999). cited by other .
Gueziec et al., "Registration of Computed Tomography Data to a Surgical Robot Using Fluoroscopy: A Feasibility Study," Computer Science/Mathematics, Sep. 27, 1996, 6 pages. cited by other .
Guthrie, B.L., Graphic-Interactive Cranial Surgery: The Operating Arm System, Handbook of Stereotaxy Using the CRW Apparatus, Chapter 13, pp. 193-211 (undated. cited by other .
Hamadeh et al, "Kinematic Study of Lumbar Spine Using Functional Radiographies and 3D/2D Registration," TIMC UMR 5525--IMAG. cited by other .
Hamadeh et al., "Automated 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic and Fluorscopic Image Registration," Computer Aided Surgery (1998), 3:11-19. cited by other .
Hamadeh et al., "Towards Automatic Registration Between CT and X-ray Images: Cooperation Between 3D/2D Registration and 2D Edge Detection," MRCAS '95, pp. 39-46. cited by other .
Hardy, T., M.D., et al., CASS: A Program for Computer Assist Stereotaxic Surgery, The Fifth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Proceedings, Nov. 1-4, 1981, IEEE, pp. 1116-1126, (1981). cited by other .
Hatch, "Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope," Thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Oct. 1984, pp. 1-189. cited by other .
Hatch, et al., "Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope", Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, Mar. 14-15, 1985, pp. 252-254. cited by other .
Heilbrun et al., "Preliminary experience with Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) computerized tomography stereotaxic guidance system," Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 59, Aug. 1983, pp. 217-222. cited by other .
Heilbrun, M.D., Progressive Technology Applications, Neurosurgery for the Third Millenium, Chapter 15, J. Whitaker & Sons, Ltd., Amer. Assoc. of Neurol. Surgeons, pp. 191-198 (1992). cited by other .
Heilbrun, M.P., Computed Tomography--Guided Stereotactic Systems, Clinical Neurosurgery, Chapter 31, pp. 564-581 (1983). cited by other .
Heilbrun, M.P., et al., Stereotactic Localization and Guidance Using a Machine Vision Technique, Sterotact & Funct. Neurosurg., Proceed. of the Mtg. of the Amer. Soc. for Sterot. and Funct. Neurosurg. (Pittsburgh, PA) vol. 58, pp. 94-98 (1992). cited by other .
Henderson et al., "An Accurate and Ergonomic Method of Registration for Image-guided Neurosurgery," Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1994, pp. 273-277. cited by other .
Hoerenz, "The Operating Microscope I. Optical Principles, Illumination Systems, and Support Systems," Journal of Microsurgery, vol. 1, 1980, pp. 364-369. cited by other .
Hofstetter et al., "Fluoroscopy Based Surgical Navigation--Concept and Clinical Applications," Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 1997, pp. 956-960. cited by other .
Horner et al., "A Comparison of CT-Stereotaxic Brain Biopsy Techniques," Investigative Radiology, Sep.-Oct. 1984, pp. 367-373. cited by other .
Hounsfield, "Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system," British Journal of Radiology, vol. 46, No. 552, Dec. 1973, pp. 1016-1022. cited by other .
Jacques et al., "A Computerized Microstereotactic Method to Approach, 3-Dimensionally Reconstruct, Remove and Adjuvantly Treat Small CNS Lesions," Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, 1980, pp. 176-182. cited by other .
Jacques et al., "Computerized three-dimensional stereotaxic removal of small central nervous system lesion in patients," J. Neurosurg., vol. 53, Dec. 1980, pp. 816-820. cited by other .
Joskowicz et al., "Computer-Aided Image-Guided Bone Fracture Surgery: Concept and Implementation," CAR '98, pp. 710-715. cited by other .
Kall, B., The Impact of Computer and Imaging Technology on Stereotactic Surgery, Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, pp. 10-22 (1987). cited by other .
Kato, A., et al., A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery, J. Neurosurg., vol. 74, pp. 845-849 (May 1991). cited by other .
Kelly et al., "Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms," Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 64, Mar. 1986, pp. 427-439. cited by other .
Kelly et al., "Precision Resection of Intra-Axial CNS Lesions by CT-Based Stereotactic Craniotomy and Computer Monitored CO2 Laser," Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 68, 1983, pp. 1-9. cited by other .
Kelly, P.J., Computer Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy and Volumetric Resection of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Brain Tumors in Children, Neurologic Clinics, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 317-336 (May 1991). cited by other .
Kelly, P.J., Computer-Directed Stereotactic Resection of Brain Tumors, Neurologica Operative Atlas, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 299-313 (1991). cited by other .
Kelly, P.J., et al., Results of Computed Tomography-based Computer-assisted Stereotactic Resection of Metastatic Intracranial Tumors, Neurosurgery, vol. 22, No. 1, Part 1, 1988, pp. 7-17 (Jan. 1988). cited by other .
Kelly, P.J., Stereotactic Imaging, Surgical Planning and Computer-Assisted Resection of Intracranial Lesions: Methods and Results, Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol. 17, pp. 78-118, (1990). cited by other .
Kim, W.S. et al., A Helmet Mounted Display for Telerobotics, IEEE, pp. 543-547 (1988). cited by other .
Klimek, L., et al., Long-Term Experience with Different Types of Localization Systems in Skull-Base Surgery, Ear, Nose & Throat Surgery, Chapter 51, pp. 635-638 (undated). cited by other .
Kosugi, Y., et al., An Articulated Neurosurgical Navigation System Using MRI and CT Images, IEEE Trans. on Biomed, Eng. vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 147-152 (Feb. 1988). cited by other .
Krybus, W., et al., Navigation Support for Surgery by Means of Optical Position Detection, Computer Assisted Radiology Proceed. of the Intl. Symp. CAR '91 Computed Assisted Radiology, pp. 362-366 (Jul. 3-6, 1991). cited by other .
Kwoh, Y.S., Ph.D., et al., A New Computerized Tomographic-Aided Robotic Stereotaxis System, Robotics Age, vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 17-22 (Jun. 1985). cited by other .
Laitinen et al., "An Adapter for Computed Tomography-Guided, Stereotaxis," Surg. Neurol., 1985, pp. 559-566. cited by other .
Laitinen, "Noninvasive multipurpose stereoadapter," Neurological Research, Jun. 1987, pp. 137-141. cited by other .
Lavallee et al, "Matching 3-D Smooth Surfaces with their 2-D Projections using 3-D Distance Maps," SPIE, vol. 1570, Geometric Methods in Computer Vision, 1991, pp. 322-336. cited by other .
Lavallee et al., "Computer Assisted Driving of a Needle into the Brain," Proceedings of the International Symposium CAR '89, Computer Assisted Radiology, 1989, pp. 416-420. cited by other .
Lavallee et al., "Computer Assisted Interventionist Imaging: The Instance of Stereotactic Brain Surgery," North-Holland MEDINFO 89, Part 1, 1989, pp. 613-617. cited by other .
Lavallee et al., "Computer Assisted Spine Surgery: A Technique For Accurate Transpedicular Screw Fixation Using CT Data and a 3-D Optical Localizer," TIMC, Faculte de Medecine de Grenoble. cited by other .
Lavallee et al., "Image guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery," Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Internation Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1992, pp. 618-624. cited by other .
Lavallee et al., "Matching of Medical Images for Computed and Robot Assisted Surgery," IEEE EMBS, Orlando, 1991. cited by other .
Lavallee, "A New System for Computer Assisted Neurosurgery," IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th Annual International Conference, 1989, pp. 0926-0927. cited by other .
Lavallee, "VI Adaption de la Methodologie a Quelques Applications Cliniques," Chapitre VI, pp. 133-148. cited by other .
Lavalle, S., et al., Computer Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction First Clinical Tests, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 11-16 (Sep. 1994). cited by other .
Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, NATO ASI Series, vol. F 60, 3d Imaging in Medic., pp. 301-312 (1990). cited by other .
Leavitt, D.D., et al., Dynamic Field Shaping to Optimize Stereotactic Radiosurgery, I.J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Physc., vol. 21, pp. 1247-1255 (1991). cited by other .
Leksell et al., "Stereotaxis and Tomography--A Technical Note," ACTA Neurochirurgica, vol. 52, 1980, pp. 1-7. cited by other .
Lemieux et al., "A Patient-to-Computed-Tomography Image Registration Method Based on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs," Med. Phys. 21 (11), Nov. 1994, pp. 1749-1760. cited by other .
Levin et al., "The Brain: Integrated Three-dimensional Display of MR and PET Images," Radiology, vol. 172, No. 3, Sep. 1989, pp. 783-789. cited by other .
Maurer, Jr., et al., Registration of Head CT Images to Physical Space Using a Weighted Combination of Points and Surfaces, IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 753-761 (Oct. 1998). cited by other .
Mazier et al., "Computer-Assisted Interventionist Imaging: Application to the Vertebral Column Surgery," Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 12, No. 1, 1990, pp. 0430-0431. cited by other .
Mazier et al., Chirurgie de la Colonne Vertebrale Assistee par Ordinateur: Appication au Vissage Pediculaire, Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 11, No. 5, 1990, pp. 559-566. cited by other .
McGirr, S., M.D., et al., Stereotactic Resection of Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytomas of the Thalamus and Basal Ganglia, Neurosurgery, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 447-452, (1987). cited by other .
Merloz, et al., "Computer Assisted Spine Surgery", Clinical Assisted Spine Surgery, No. 337, pp. 86-96. cited by other .
Ng, W.S. et al., Robotic Surgery--A First-Hand Experience in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Surgery, IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biology, pp. 120-125 (Mar. 1993). cited by other .
Pelizzari et al., "Accurate Three-Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain," Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Jan./Feb. 1989, pp. 20-26. cited by other .
Pelizzari et al., "Interactive 3D Patient-Image Registration," Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 12th International Conference, IPMI '91, Jul. 7-12, 136-141 (A.C.F. Colchester et al. eds. 1991). cited by other .
Pelizzari et al., No. 528--"Three Dimensional Correlation of PET, CT and MRI Images," The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, No. 4, Apr. 1987, p. 682. cited by other .
Penn, R.D., et al., Stereotactic Surgery with Image Processing of Computerized Tomographic Scans, Neurosurgery, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 157-163 (Sep.-Oct. 1978). cited by other .
Phillips et al., "Image Guided Orthopaedic Surgery Design and Analysis," Trans Inst. MC, vol. 17, No. 5, 1995, pp. 251-264. cited by other .
Pixsys, 3-D Digitizing Accessories, by Pixsys (marketing brochure) (undated) (2 pages). cited by other .
Potamianos et al., "Intra-Operative Imaging Guidance for Keyhole Surgery Methodology and Calibration," First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Sep. 22-24, 1994, pp. 98-104. cited by other .
Prestige Cervical Disc System Surgical Technique, 12 pgs. cited by other .
Reinhardt et al., "CT-Guided `Real Time` Stereotaxy," Acta Neurochirurgica, 1989. cited by other .
Reinhardt, H., et al., A Computer-Assisted Device for Intraoperative CT-Correlated Localization of Brain Tumors, pp. 51-58 (1988). cited by other .
Reinhardt, H.F. et al., Sonic Stereometry in Microsurgical Procedures for Deep-Seated Brain Tumors and Vascular Malformations, Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 51-57 (Jan. 1993). cited by other .
Reinhardt, H.F., et al., Mikrochirugische Entfernung tiefliegender Gefa.beta.mi.beta.bild ungen mit Hilfe der Sonar-Stereometrie (Microsurgical Removal of Deep-Seated Vascular Malformations Using Sonar Stereometry). Ultraschall in Med. 12, pp. 80-83 (1991). cited by other .
Reinhardt, Hans. F., Neuronavigation: A Ten-Year Review, Neurosurgery, pp. 329-341 (undated). cited by other .
Roberts et al., "A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope," J. Neurosurg., vol. 65, Oct. 1986, pp. 545-549. cited by other .
Rosenbaum et al., "Computerized Tomography Guided Stereotaxis: A New Approach," Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, No. 3-5, 1980, pp. 172-173. cited by other .
Sautot, "Vissage Pediculaire Assiste Par Ordinateur," Sep. 20, 1994. cited by other .
Schueler et al., "Correction of Image Intensifier Distortion for Three-Dimensional X-Ray Angiography," SPIE Medical Imaging 1995, vol. 2432, pp. 272-279. cited by other .
Selvik et al., "A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric System," Acta Radiologica Diagnosis, 1983, pp. 343-352. cited by other .
Shelden et al., "Development of a computerized microsteroetaxic method for localization and removal of minute CNS lesions under direct 3-D vision," J. Neurosurg., vol. 52, 1980, pp. 21-27. cited by other .
Simon, D.A., Accuracy Validation in Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Annual Intl. Symp. on Med. Rob. an Comp-Assisted surgery, MRCAS '95, pp. 185-192 (undated). cited by other .
Smith et al., "Computer Methods for Improved Diagnostic Image Display Applied to Stereotactic Neurosurgery," Automedical, vol. 14, 1992, pp. 371-382 (4 unnumbered pages). cited by other .
Smith et al., "The Neurostation.TM.--A Highly Accurate, Minimally Invasive Solution to Frameless Stereotactic Neurosurgery," Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, Jul.-Aug. 1994, pp. 247-256. cited by other .
Smith, K.R., et al. Multimodality Image Analysis and Display Methods for Improved Tumor Localization in Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Annul Intl. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Soc., vol. 13, No. 1, p. 210 (1991). cited by other .
Tan, K., Ph.D., et al., A frameless stereotactic approach to neurosurgical planning based on retrospective patient-image registration, J Neurosurgy, vol. 79, pp. 296-303 (Aug. 1993). cited by other .
The Laitinen Stereotactic System, E2-E6. cited by other .
Thompson, et al., A System for Anatomical and Functional Mapping of the Human Thalamus, Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 10, pp. 9-24 (1977). cited by other .
Trobraugh, J.W., et al., Frameless Stereotactic Ultrasonography: Method and Applications, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 235-246 (1994). cited by other .
Viant et al., "A Computer Assisted Orthopaedic System for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails," Proc. of MediMEC '95, Bristol, 1995, pp. 86-91. cited by other .
Von Hanwhr et al., Foreword, Computerized Medical Imagine and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 225-228, (Jul.-Aug. 1994). cited by other .
Wang, M.Y., et al., An Automatic Technique for Finding and Localizing Externally Attached Markers in CT and MR Volume Images of the Head, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 627-637 (Jun. 1996). cited by other .
Watanabe et al., "Three-Dimensional Digitizer (Neuronavigator): New Equipment for Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotaxic Surgery," Surgical Neurology, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 1987, pp. 543-547. cited by other .
Watanabe, "Neuronavigator," Igaku-no-Ayumi, vol. 137, No. 6, May 10, 1986, pp. 1-4. cited by other .
Watanabe, E., M.D., et al., Open Surgery Assisted by the Neuronavigator, a Stereotactic, Articulated, Sensitive Arm, Neurosurgery, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 792-800 (1991). cited by other .
Weese et al., "An Approach to 2D/3D Registration of a Vertebra in 2D X-ray Fluoroscopies with 3D CT Images," pp. 119-128. cited by other .
Weinstein, et al., Spinal Pedicle Fixation: Reliability and Validity of Roentgenogram-Based Assessment and Surgical Factors on Successful Screw Placement, Spine, vol. 13, No. 9, 1988, pp. 1012-1018. cited by examiner .
Kelly, The NeuroStation System for Image-Guided, Frameless Stereotaxy, Neurosurgery, vol. 37, No. 2, Aug. 1995, pp. 348-350. cited by examiner .
Vector Vision: The Power of Surgical Tracking, BrainLab, 1997. cited by examiner .
J.F. Mallet, et al., Post-Laminectomy Cervical-Thoracic Kyphosis in a Patient with Von Recklinghausen's Disease, Spinal Frontiers, vol. Three, Issue One, Apr. 1996, pp. 1-15. cited by examiner .
Bucholz, et al., Image-Guided Surgical Techniques for Infections and Trauma of the Central Nervous System, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, vol. 7, No. 2, Apr. 1996, pp. 187-200. cited by examiner .
Foley, et al., Image-guided Intraoperative Spinal Localization, Intraoperative Neuroprotection: Monitoring, Part Three, 1996, pp. 325-340. cited by examiner .
Mazier, et al., Computer Assisted Interventionist Imaging: Application to the Vertebral Column Surgery, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 12, No. 1, 1990, pp. 0430-0431. cited by examiner .
Lavallee, et al., Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, NATO ASI Series, vol. F 60, 1990, pp. 301-312. cited by examiner .
Adams et al., Computer-Assisted Surgery, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, May 1990, pp. 43-51. cited by examiner .
3-D Digitizer Captures the World, BYTE, Oct. 1990, p. 43. cited by examiner .
Reinhardt, et al., Interactive Sonar-Operated Device for Stereotactic and Open Surgery, Proceedings of the Xth Meeting of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Maebashi, Japan, Oct. 1989, pp. 393-397. cited by examiner .
Kato, et al., A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery, J. Neurosurgery 74 1991, pp. 845-849. cited by examiner .
Smith et al., Multimodality Image Analysis and Display Methods for Improved Tumor Localization in Stereotatic Neurosurgery, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 13, 1991, p. 0210. cited by examiner .
Sautot et al., Computer Assisted Spine Surgery: a first step toward clinical application in orthopaedics, IEEE, 1992, p. 1071-1072. cited by examiner .
Cinquin, et al., GOR: Image Guided Operating Robot. Methodology, Applications, IEEE EMBS, Paris 1992, pp. 1-2. cited by examiner .
Alignment Procedure for the PixSys Two-Emitter Offset Probe for the SAC GP-8-3d Sonic Digitizer, PixSys, Jul. 2, 1992, pp. 1-4. cited by examiner .
Smith, et al., Computer Methods for Improved Diagnostic Image Display Applied to Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Automedica, 1992, vol. 14, pp. 371-382. cited by examiner .
Reinhardt, Neuronavigation: A Ten-Year Review, Neurosurgery, 1993, pp. 329-341. cited by examiner .
Bucholz, et al., Intraoperative localization using a three dimensional optical digitizer, SPIE vol. 1894, Jan. 17, 1993, pp. 312-322. cited by examiner .
Smith, et al., The Neurostation.TM. -A Highly Accurate, Minimally Invasive Solution to Frameless Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, 1994, pp. 247-256. cited by examiner .
Bucholz, et al., Halo vest versus spinal fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome study, J. Neurosurg., vol. 70, pp. 884-892. cited by examiner .
Awwad, et al., Post-traumatic Spinal Synovial Cyst with Spondylolysis: CT Features, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 13, No. 2, 1989, pp. 334-337. cited by examiner.

Primary Examiner: Manuel; George
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Harness, Dickey, Pierce, P.L.C.

Parent Case Text

.Iadd.This application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,548 issued on May 1, 2001 and also claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.120 as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/423,332 filed on Apr. 24, 2003 now RE39,133; which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,548 issued on May 1, 2001; which claims rights under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119 on provisional application Ser. No. 60/059,915, filed on Sep. 24, 1997. Notice is also given that concurrently filed is United States Patent Application No. filed on; which is also is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,548 issued on May 1, 2001 and also claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.120 as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/423,332 filed on Apr. 24, 2003; which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,548 issued on May 1, 2001; which claims rights under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119 on provisional application Ser. No. 60/059,915, filed on Sep. 24, 1997. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference..Iaddend.

The present invention claims rights under 35 U.S.C. .sctn. 119 on provisional application No. 60/059,915, filed on Sep. 24, 1997, and entitled "Percutaneous Registration Apparatus and Method for Use in Computer-Assisted Surgical Navigation."

Claims

What is claimed is:

.[.1. An apparatus for facilitating percutaneous placement of surgical instruments into the spine, adapted for use with a surgical navigation system employing an energy-detecting array in communication with a surgical navigation computer to track positions of instruments in three dimensional space relative to a known reference point, said apparatus comprising: a connector adapted to be rigidly attached to a portion of the spine; at least one central post connected to said connector; a position identification structure rigidly and removably connected to said central post at a predetermined position on said central post and adapted to be reconnected at the same said predetermined position, said identification structure being further adapted to allow a patient to be scanned with the structure connected to the central post, said structure including an assembly for communicating positioning information with respect to said assembly to the energy detecting array and surgical navigation computer; and a connector assembly for said reconnecting of said structure substantially to said predetermined position on said central post..].

.[.2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the connector is a clamp having teeth adapted for biting into a spinous process..].

.[.3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the connector includes an elongated fixture with a central axis and a threaded end adapted to be inserted into the spinous process and a substantially rigid wire connected to the fixture with the central axis of the wire adapted to be implanted into the spinous process at an angle to elongated fixture to prevent the fixture from rotating..].

.[.4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said assembly for communication positioning information is a substantially H-shaped frame..].

.[.5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said assembly for communicating positioning information is a substantially W-shaped frame..].

.[.6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said assembly for communicating positioning information is a substantially U-shaped frame..].

.[.7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said assembly for communicating positioning information is a substantially X-shaped frame..].

.[.8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said assembly for communicating positioning information comprises: a fiducial array for registering the location of a spinal element with rigidly connected fiducials; and a reference arc for signaling the position of a spinal element, said arc further comprising rigidly connected emitters..].

.[.9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said reference point is on the spine..].

.[.10. A method for monitoring the location of an instrument, surgical implant and various portions of the body, to be operated on, using a surgical navigation system with a surgical navigation computer and a digitizer array for monitoring the location of instruments in three-dimensional space relative to a known reference point, said method comprising the steps of: attaching a fixture having a central post to a portion of the spine; removably attaching an identification structure including a fiducial array and a reference arc to said central post; providing a scanned three-dimensional image of a patient including said fiducial array rigidly attached to said central post of said fixture, said fixture being rigidly attached to the patient to identify the position of said fixture and said fiducial array on the scanned image; using an image-guided system, by touching an image guided surgical pointer to one or more fiducials on the fiducial array to register the location of a spinal element fixed to said array; and emitting a signal from said reference arc to indicate changes in position of the spinal element during a surgical procedure..].

.[.11. The method of claim 10, further comprising: performing a surgical procedure percutaneously on a patient using an instrument and implant locatable relative to the spinal element and said structure in known positions identified in the surgical navigation system..].

.[.12. The method of claim 10, further comprising: inserting a threaded fixture having a substantially rigid wire into a spinal element; and touching an image guided pointer to said threaded fixture and wire to positively register the location of said fixture and wire in a surgical navigation computer..].

.[.13. The method of claim 10, further comprising: implanting imageable devices into spinal elements to identify the location of the spinal elements in the surgical navigation computer..].

.[.14. The method of claim 10, further comprising: implanting imageable devices into a plurality of spinal elements; and manipulating the patient's spine by viewing the location of the implanted devices, as communicated to the surgical navigation computer by touching an instrument with a tracking emitter to said implanted imageable devices to align the actual position of the spinal elements with the previously scanned image..].

.[.15. The method of claim 10 further comprising: percutaneously implanting screws into spinal elements; and locating the position of said screws using image guided surgical navigation techniques..].

.[.16. The method of claim 15 further comprising: manipulating the orientation of the screw heads percutaneously using a head-positioning probe for communicating location containing an emitter, said probe communicating to the surgical navigation computer the orientation of the screw heads; and using a head positioning tool for manipulating implants having an end portion that mates with the heads of the screws and rotating the screws to receive a connecting implant..].

.[.17. The method of claim 16 further comprising: tracking the location and position of the connecting implant by means of an instrument affixed to the implant having emitters capable of communicating orientation and location to the surgical navigation computer..].

.[.18. A system for use in performing the percutaneous placement of surgical implants and instruments into the spine using image guided surgery and a surgical navigation computer and energy detecting array, said system comprising: means for attaching a fixture to a portion of the spine; means for communicating position information to the surgical navigation computer and energy detecting array said means rigidly and removably connected to said means for attaching a fixture; means for providing location information of said spinal portion to the surgical navigation system adapted to be connected to spinal elements; means for indicating screw-head position said means electrically connected to the surgical navigation system and adapted to mate with the head of a screw implanted in one or more of said spinal elements..].

.[.19. The system of claim 18 further comprising: an elongated implant adapted to be inserted into said implanted screws; means for indicating the position of said elongated implant electrically connected to the surgical navigation system and adapted to mate with the elongated implant..].

.[.20. The system of claim 18, wherein said implanted screws have heads and the elongated implant is a rod adapted to be guided through holes in said implanted screw heads..].

.Iadd.21. A method of positioning an implant in an anatomy, including a first implant portion and a second implant portion with a surgical navigation system, comprising: positioning the first implant portion through an opening in a soft tissue of the anatomy; tracking a position of the first implant portion; interconnecting an implant inserter with the second implant portion; determining a location of the second implant portion; and moving the second implant portion relative to the first implant portion via determining a location of the second implant portion..Iaddend.

.Iadd.22. The method of claim 21, wherein positioning a first implant portion through an opening in a soft tissue, moving the second implant portion relative to the first implant portion, or combinations thereof includes positioning the first implant portion, the second implant portion, or combinations thereof percutaneously..Iaddend.

.Iadd.23. The method of claim 22, wherein tracking a position of the first implant portion includes; interconnecting a tracking apparatus with the first implant portion; and tracking the tracking apparatus interconnected to the first implant portion..Iaddend.

.Iadd.24. The method of claim 23, further comprising: determining a position of the portion of the first implant portion; wherein moving the second implant portion relative to the first implant portion includes determining a location of a second implant portion relative to the first implant portion..Iaddend.

.Iadd.25. The method of claim 24, further comprising: displaying the determined position of the first implant portion and the position of the second implant portion..Iaddend.

.Iadd.26. The method of claim 21, further comprising: configuring the second implant portion based upon a tracked position of the first implant portion, a determined location of the second implant portion, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.27. The method of claim 21, further comprising: interconnecting a reference frame with the anatomy..Iaddend.

.Iadd.28. The method of claim 27, further comprising: displaying a determined position of the second implant portion on a display relative to a registered image of the anatomy..Iaddend.

.Iadd.29. The method of claim 21, further comprising: interconnecting a tracking apparatus with the implant inserter; and tracking the tracking apparatus..Iaddend.

.Iadd.30. The method of claim 29, wherein the tracking apparatus includes a sensor..Iaddend.

.Iadd.31. The method of claim 30, further comprising: selecting a sensor to include at least one of a light emitter, an infrared light emitter, an electromagnet, a magnet, a radiation emitter, an acoustic emitter, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.32. The method of claim 21, wherein determining a location of the second implant further includes tracking the tracking apparatus..Iaddend.

.Iadd.33. The method of claim 21, further comprising: imaging the anatomy while at least one of tracking the position of the first implant, tracking the tracking apparatus, determining a location of a portion of the second implant portion, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.34. The method of claim 33, wherein imaging the anatomy includes imaging the anatomy with an ultrasound system..Iaddend.

.Iadd.35. The method of claim 21, further comprising: positioning a third implant portion through an opening in a soft tissue; and interconnecting the first implant portion and the third implant portion with the second implant portion by moving the second implant portion relative to the first implant portion and the third implant portion..Iaddend.

.Iadd.36. The method of claim 21, wherein said first implant portion is a slot in a screw head; wherein said second implant portion is a rod; wherein moving the second implant portion includes aligning the rod with the slot..Iaddend.

.Iadd.37. The method of claim 36, further comprising: fixing the first implant portion to a vertebrae..Iaddend.

.Iadd.38. The method of claim 21, wherein tracking a position includes tracking with an acoustic tracking system, optical tracking system, electromagnetic tracking system, micropulsed radar, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.39. A method of performing a spinal procedure in an anatomy with a surgical navigation system, comprising: positioning a first screw implant in a vertebrae percutaneously through an opening in a soft tissue of the anatomy; tracking a position of the first screw implant with a screw tracking apparatus; orientating the first screw implant in a selected orientation at least in part via tracking the position of the first screw implant; interconnecting an implant inserter with a rod; determining a position of a portion of the rod; and moving the rod relative to the first screw implant via determining a location of the rod to interconnect the screw with rod..Iaddend.

.Iadd.40. The method of claim 39, further comprising: interconnecting a second tracking apparatus with the implant inserter..Iaddend.

.Iadd.41. The method of claim 39, wherein orientating said first screw implant includes orientating a slot defined by the screw..Iaddend.

.Iadd.42. The method of claim 41, wherein tracking a position of the first screw implant includes interconnecting the screw tracking apparatus with the first screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.43. The method of claim 42, wherein interconnecting the screw tracking apparatus includes selecting a sensor..Iaddend.

.Iadd.44. The method of claim 43, wherein selecting the sensor includes selecting a light emitting diode, a light reflector, an infrared emitter, a magnet, an electromagnet, an acoustic emitter, an infrared reflector, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.45. The method of claim 42, wherein interconnecting the screw tracking apparatus with the first screw implant includes positioning the screw tracking apparatus percutaneously..Iaddend.

.Iadd.46. The method of claim 42, wherein tracking the tracking apparatus includes at least triangulating a position of the tracking apparatus with the surgical navigational system..Iaddend.

.Iadd.47. The method of claim 46, wherein the surgical navigation system includes an acoustic tracking system, or electromagnetic tracking system, an optical tracking system, a micropulsed radar, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.48. The method of claim 41, wherein orientating the first screw implant includes orientating the slot relative to the anatomy..Iaddend.

.Iadd.49. The method of claim 48, further comprising: positioning a second screw implant in a vertebrae percutaneously; and orientating the second screw implant; wherein orientating the second screw implant includes orientating second screw implant relative to the first screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.50. The method of claim 49, wherein moving the rod relative to the first screw implant includes moving the rod relative to both the first screw implant and the second screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.51. The method of claim 50, further comprising: manipulating the rod to achieve an interconnection of the first screw implant and the second screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.52. The method of claim 48, wherein interconnecting the implant inserter with the rod includes interconnecting the implant inserter near a first end of the rod, a second end of the rod, a portion intermediate between the first end and the second end, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.53. The method of claim 48, wherein interconnecting an implant inserter with a rod includes rigidly interconnecting an implant inserter with the rod..Iaddend.

.Iadd.54. The method of claim 53, further comprising: interconnecting a tracking apparatus with the implant inserter that includes rigidly interconnecting the tracking apparatus with the implant inserter..Iaddend.

.Iadd.55. The method of claim 48, wherein interconnecting an implant inserter with a rod includes releasably interconnecting the implant inserter with the rod..Iaddend.

.Iadd.56. The method of claim 48, further comprising: interconnecting a tracking apparatus with the implant inserter that includes positioning an emitter on the tracking apparatus..Iaddend.

.Iadd.57. The method of claim 56, wherein interconnecting a sensor with the tracking apparatus includes selecting at least one of a light emitting a diode, a light reflecting portion, an infrared light emitting portion, an infrared light reflecting portion, an acoustic emitter, an electromagnet, a magnet, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.58. The method of claim 48, further comprising: imaging a portion of the anatomy..Iaddend.

.Iadd.59. The method of claim 58, wherein imaging an portion of the anatomy includes obtaining an MRI scan, a CT scan, an x-ray image, an ultrasound image, or combinations thereof..Iaddend.

.Iadd.60. The method of claim 48, further comprising: displaying an image of the anatomy; and displaying a position of the portion of the screw on the display relative to the image of the anatomy, and displaying a determined position of the rod relative to the image of the anatomy..Iaddend.

.Iadd.61. The method of claim 60, wherein moving the rod relative to the screw includes displaying on the display the portion of the rod relative to the position of the head of the screw..Iaddend.

.Iadd.62. The method of claim 61, further comprising: manipulating the rod to achieve a selected interconnection of the rod and the screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.63. The method of claim 62, wherein manipulating the rod includes bending the rod..Iaddend.

.Iadd.64. The method of claim 63, further comprising: positioning a second screw implant in a vertebrae percutaneously; and moving the rod relative to the screw implant and the second screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.65. The method of claim 48, wherein moving the rod relative to the screw includes moving the rod substantially percutaneously..Iaddend.

.Iadd.66. The method of claim 65, wherein moving the rod substantially percutaneously includes inserting the rod through a substantially single opening in a soft tissue of the anatomy and moving the rod based upon a tracked position of the rod..Iaddend.

.Iadd.67. The method of claim 66, wherein tracking a position of the portion of the screw and determining a position of a portion of the rod is substantially percutaneous..Iaddend.

.Iadd.68. The method of claim 48, wherein tracking the position of the first screw implant includes tracking a position of a slot defined by the screw..Iaddend.

.Iadd.69. The method of claim 68, wherein moving the rod relative to the first screw implant includes moving the rod percutaneously through the slot..Iaddend.

.Iadd.70. The method of claim 69, further comprising: positioning a second screw implant in a vertebrae percutaneously through an opening in a soft tissue of the anatomy; tracking a position of the second screw implant; and orientating the second screw implant in a selected orientation at least in part via tracking the position of the second screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.71. The method of claim 70, wherein orientating the second screw implant includes aligning a second slot defined by the second screw implant with a first slot defined by the first screw implant at least in part by tracking the position of the first screw implant, tracking the position of the first screw implant, or combinations thereof; wherein moving the rod includes moving the rod through the first slot and the second slot..Iaddend.

.Iadd.72. The method of claim 71, further comprising: fixing the rod to the first screw implant and the second screw implant..Iaddend.

.Iadd.73. The method of claim 39, wherein orientating the first screw implant includes selecting an orientation of a head of the screw relative to a portion of the anatomy..Iaddend.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to guiding, directing, or navigating instruments or implants in a body percutaneously, in conjunction with systems that use and generate images during medical and surgical procedures, which images assist in executing the procedures and indicate the relative position of various body parts, surgical implants, and instruments. In particular the invention relates to apparatus and minimally invasive procedures for navigating instruments and providing surgical implants percutaneously in the spine, for example, to stabilize the spine, correct deformity, or enhance fusion in conjunction with a surgical navigation system for generating images during medical and surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Typically, spinal surgical procedures used, for example, to provide stabilization, fusion, or to correct deformities, require large incisions and substantial exposure of the spinal areas to permit the placement of surgical implants such as, for example, various forms of screws or hooks linked by rods, wires, or plates into portions of the spine. This standard procedure is invasive and can result in trauma, blood loss, and post operative pain. Alternatively, fluoroscopes have been used to assist in placing screws beneath the skin. In this alternative procedure at least four incisions must be made in the patient's back for inserting rods or wires through previously inserted screws. However, this technique can be difficult in that fluoroscopes only provide two-dimensional images and require the surgeon to rotate the fluoroscope frequently in order to get a mental image of the anatomy in three dimensions. Fluoroscopes also generate radiation to which the patient and surgical staff may become over exposed over time. Additionally, the subcutaneous implants required for this procedure may irritate the patient. A lever arm effect can also occur with the screws that are not connected by the rods or wires at the spine. Fluoroscopic screw placement techniques have traditionally used rods or plates that are subcutaneous to connect screws from vertebra to vertebra. This is due in part to the fact that there is no fluoroscopic technique that has been designed which can always adequately place rods or plates at the submuscular region (or adjacent to the vertebrae). These subcutaneous rods or plates may not be well tolerated by the patient. They also may not provide the optimal mechanical support to the spine because the moment arm of the construct can be increased, thereby translating higher loads and stresses through the construct.

A number of different types of surgical navigation systems have been described that include indications of the positions of medical instruments and patient anatomy used in medical or surgical procedures. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,454 to Bucholz; PCT Application No. PCT/US94/04530 (Publication No. WO 94/24933) to Bucholz; and PCT Application No. PCT/US95/12894 (Publication No. WO 96/11624) to Bucholz et al., the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, disclose systems for use during a medical or surgical procedure using scans generated by a scanner prior to the procedure. Surgical navigation systems typically include tracking means such as, for example, an LED array on the body part, LED emitters on the medical instruments, a digitizer to track the positions of the body part and the instruments, and a display for the position of an instrument used in a medical procedure relative to an image of a body part.

Bucholz et al. WO 96/11624 is of particular interest, in that it identifies special issues associated with surgical navigation in the spine, where there are multiple vertebral bodies that can move with respect to each other. Bucholz et al. describes a procedure for operating on the spine during an open process where, after imaging, the spinous process reference points may move with respect to each other. It also discloses a procedure for modifying and repositioning the image data set to match the actual position of the anatomical elements. When there is an opportunity for anatomical movement, such movement degrades the fidelity of the pre-procedural images in depicting the intra-procedural anatomy. Therefore, additional innovations are desirable to bring image guidance to the parts of the body experiencing anatomical movement.

Furthermore, spinal surgical procedures are typically highly invasive. There is, thus, a need for more minimally invasive techniques for performing these spinal procedures, such as biopsy, spinal fixation, endoscopy, spinal implant insertion, fusion, and insertion of drug delivery systems, by reducing incision size and amount. One such way is to use surgical navigation equipment to perform procedures percutaneously, that is beneath the skin. To do so by means of surgical navigation also requires apparatus that can indicate the position of the spinal elements, such as, for example the vertebrae, involved in the procedure relative to the instruments and implants being inserted beneath the patient's skin and into the patient's spine. Additionally, because the spinal elements naturally move relative to each other, the user requires the ability to reorient these spinal elements to align with earlier scanned images stored in the surgical navigation system computer, to assure the correct location of those elements relative to the instruments and implants being applied or inserted percutaneously.

In light of the foregoing, there is a need in the art for apparatus and minimally invasive procedures for percutaneous placement of surgical implants and instruments in the spine, reducing the size and amount of incisions and utilizing surgical navigation techniques.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to apparatus and procedures for percutaneous placement of surgical implants and instruments such as, for example, screws, rods, wires and plates into various body parts using image guided surgery. More specifically, one object of the present invention is directed to apparatus and procedures for the percutaneous placement of surgical implants and instruments into various elements of the spine using image guided surgery.

To achieve these objects and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the invention includes an apparatus for use with a surgical navigation system and comprises an attaching device rigidly connected to a body part, such as the spinous process of a vertebrae, with an identification superstructure rigidly but removably connected to the attaching device. This identification superstructure is a reference arc and fiducial array, which accomplishes the function of identifying the location of the superstructure, and, therefore, the body part to which it is fixed, during imaging by CAT scan or MRI, and later during medical procedures.

In one aspect, the attaching device is a clamp with jaws and sharp teeth for biting into the spinous process.

In another aspect, the fixture is a screw, having a head, wherein the screw is implanted into the spinous process and a relatively rigid wire is attached to the head of the screw and also implanted into the spinous process at an angle to the axis of the screw to prevent the screw from rotating in either direction.

In another aspect, the superstructure includes a central post, and a fiducial array and a reference arc rigidly but removably attached to the central post. The fiducial array is composed of image-compatible materials, and includes fiducials for providing a reference point, indicating the position of the array, which are rigidly attached to the fiducial array, composed of, for example titanium or aluminum spheres. The reference arc includes emitters, such as, for example Light Emitting Diodes ("LEDs"), passive reflective spheres, or other tracking means such as acoustic, magnetic, electromagnetic, radiologic, or micropulsed radar, for indicating the location of the reference arc and, thus, the body part it is attached to, during medical procedures.

In addition, the invention further comprises a method for monitoring the location of an instrument, surgical implants and the various portions of the body, for example, vertebrae, to be operated on in a surgical navigation system comprising the steps of: attaching a fixture to the spinous process; attaching a superstructure including a fiducial array with fiducials and a reference arc to the fixture; scanning the patient using CT, MRI or some other three-dimensional method, with fiducial array rigidly fixed to patient to identify it on the scanned image; and thereafter, in an operating room, using image-guided technology, touching an image-guided surgical pointer or other instrument to one or more of the fiducials on the fiducial array to register the location of the spinal element fixed to the array and emitting an audio, visual, radiologic, magnetic or other detectable signal from the reference arc to an instrument such as, for example, a digitizer or other position-sensing unit, to indicate changes in position of the spinal element during a surgical procedure, and performing a surgical or medical procedure percutaneously on the patient using instruments and implants locatable relative to spinal elements in a known position in the surgical navigation system.

In another aspect, the method includes inserting screws or rigid wires in spinal elements in the area involved in the anticipated surgical procedure before scanning the patient, and after scanning the patient and bringing the patient to the operating area, touching an image-guided or tracked surgical pointer to these screws and wires attached to the vertebrae to positively register their location in the surgical navigation computer, and manipulating either the patient's spine or the image to align the actual position of the spinal elements with the scanned image.

In another aspect, the method includes percutaneously implanting screws into spinal elements, which screws are located using image guided surgical navigation techniques, and further manipulating the orientation of the screw heads percutaneously using a head-positioning probe containing an emitter, that can communicate to the surgical navigation computer the orientation of the screw heads and position them, by use of a specially designed head-positioning tool with an end portion that mates with the heads of the screws and can rotate those screw heads to receive a rod, wire, plate, or other connecting implant. If a rod is being inserted into the screw heads for example, the method further includes tracking the location and position of the rod, percutaneously using a rod inserter having one or more emitters communicating the location and orientation of the rod to the surgical navigation computer.

The objects of the invention are to provide a user, such as a surgeon, with the system and method to track an instrument and surgical implants used in conjunction with a surgical navigation system in such a manner to operate percutaneously on a patient's body parts, such as spinal vertebrae which can move relative to each other.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a system and method to simply and yet positively indicate to the user a change in position of body parts, such as spinal vertebrae segments, from that identified in a stored image scan, such as from an MRI or CAT scan, and provide a method to realign those body parts to correspond with a previously stored image or the image to correspond with the actual current position of the body parts.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a system or method for allowing a fiducial array or reference arc that is removable from a location rigidly fixed to a body part and replaceable back in that precise location.

It is another object of this invention to provide a system and method for positively generating a display of instruments and surgical implants, such as, for example screws and rods, placed percutaneously in a patient using image-guided surgical methods and techniques.

It is another object of this invention for a percutaneous reference array and fiducial array, as described in this appplication, to be used to register and track the position of the vertebrae for the purposes of targeting a radiation dose to a diseased portion of said vertebrae using a traditional radiosurgical technique.

Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in this description.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one embodiment of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of one preferred embodiment of a superstructure for use in the current invention, including a reference arc, center post and fiducial array and rigid Kirschner wires ("K wires") and screws placed in the spine for use with a surgical navigation system for percutaneous spinal surgical procedures.

FIG. 1A is an enlarged view of the superstructure depicted in FIG. 1 engaging a vertebra by a clamp and also K wires implanted in adjacent vertebrae in the superior and inferior positions of the spinous process.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of the preferred embodiment of a clamp fixture for rigid connection to the spinous process of a single vertebrae with an H-shaped fiducial array attached to a center post rigidly attached to the clamp and a mating connector at the tip of the post for mating with a reference array, and a reference array for use in the current invention.

FIG. 2A is a side view of FIG. 2 FIG. 2B is another side view of FIG. 2.

FIG. 2C is a top view of FIG. 2.

FIG. 2D is an exploded view of FIG. 2 without the reference arc.

FIG. 2E is an exploded view of the interface of the center post and clamp of FIG. 2.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a W-Shaped fiducial array mounted to a central post with generally spherical fiducials attached to the array, for mounting to a single vertebrae.

FIG. 3A is a side view of FIG. 3.

FIG. 3B is another side view of FIG. 3.

FIG. 3C is a top view of FIG. 3.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of a reference arc and fiducial attached to a center post for use in the current invention in mounting to a single vertebrae.

FIG. 4A is a side view of FIG. 4.

FIG. 4B is a back view of FIG. 4.

FIG. 4C is a top view of FIG. 4.

FIG. 4D is an expanded view of FIG. 4.

FIG. 4E is an expanded side view of FIG. 4.

FIG. 4F is an expanded view of the array foot and shoe of FIG. 4E.

FIG. 5 is a diagram of an alternative embodiment of a fixture for use in the current invention using a cannulated screw for insertion into a vertebrae, with Kirschner wire mounted on a central post and including an alternate embodiment of a fiduciary array and reference arc combined on a single structure.

FIG. 6 is a side view of the screw and Kirschner wire fixture of FIG. 5 implanted in a spinous process of a vertebrae.

FIG. 7 is a diagram of a screw-head positioning probe and multiaxial screw for insertion into a single vertebrae.

FIG. 7A is a diagram of the screw of FIG. 7.

FIG. 8 is a diagram of a head positioning probe, multiaxial screw and spinal segment.

FIG. 9 is a diagram of a rod inserter with an LED.

FIG. 10 is a diagram of an alternative embodiment of the invention depicting a cannulated tube and attachment for holding a reference arc.

FIG. 11 is a diagram of the cannulated tube of FIG. 10 with a reference arc and screw for attachment to a spinal process.

FIG. 12 is a posterior view of spinal segment and implanted screws before alignment.

FIG. 13 is a posterior view of spinal segment and implanted screws after alignment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiment of the invention, an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. The following example is intended to be purely exemplary of the invention.

As generally described in PCT/US95/12894, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, a typical surgical navigation system is shown in FIG. 1 adopted to be used in the present invention. A computer assisted image-guided surgery system, indicated generally at 10, generates an image for display on a monitor 106 representing the position of one or more body elements, such as spinal elements fixedly held in a stabilizing frame or device such as a spinal surgery frame 125 commonly used for spinal surgery. A reference arc 120 bearing tracking means or emitters, such as for example LED emitters 122, is mounted to the spinous process by a central post 150. The structures 20 and K wires 260 of FIG. 1 are depicted in more detail in FIG. 1A. The image 105 is generated from an image data set, usually generated preoperatively by a CAT scanner or by MRI for example, which image 105 has reference points for at least one body element, such as a spinal element or vertebrae. The reference points of the particular body element have a fixed spatial relation to the particular body element.

The system includes an apparatus such as a digitizer or other Position Sensing Unit (PSU), such as for example sensor array 110 on support 112 for identifying, during the procedure, the relative position of each of the reference points to be displayed by tracking the position of emitters 122 on arc 120. The system also includes a processor 114 such as a PC or other suitable workstation processor associated with controller 108 for modifying the image data set according to the identified relative position of each of the reference points during the procedure, as identified by digitizer 110. The processor 114 can then, for example, generate an image data set representing the position of the body elements during the procedure for display on monitor 106. A surgical instrument 130, such as a probe or drill or other tool, may be included in the system, which is positioned relative to a body part and similarly tracked by sensor array 110.

In summary, the general operation of a surgical navigating system is well known in the art and need not further be described here.

In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, with further reference to FIGS. 1 through 6, a registration device 20 is rigidly fixed to a spinal element by, for example, a device such as a bone clamp 30 depicted in FIG. 2. Alternatively, a screw retention device 40, such as the cannulated screw 42 depicted in FIG. 5, and described in more detail below, can be used.

With reference now to FIG. 2, bone clamp 30 is fixedly attached to the spinous process. The clamp 30 includes at least two blades (or jaws) 32 with tips or teeth 34, which are preferably sharp, for driving together and penetrating soft tissue or more dense bone for rigid fixation to the spinous process. The teeth 34 are also preferably sized to accommodate the bulb shape of the spinous process. The driving mechanism 40 is, for example, a screw driven into a sleeve 41 and is also preferably located such that it will be accessible in a percutaneous manner. Attached to the clamp 30 is a superstructure 20. The superstructure 20 includes a central post 150 which is relocatable, that is, it fixes to the clamp 30 in a rigid fashion, for example, as depicted in FIGS. 2D and 2E, by being inserted into a V-shaped wedge 44 orienting the post 150 front to back and providing a mating hole 48 along the wedge 44 for insertion of post 150 in a single orientation and also providing fasteners such as screw 43 for tightning to lock the post 150 in place. The post 150 can be removed and reapplied by loosening and tightening screw 43, such that the original geometry and orientation is maintained. The central post 150 has at its apex a connector 60 with unique geometrical configuration, such as, for example, a starburst, onto which a spinal reference arc 120 of the superstructure 20 attaches. Any such standard reference arc 120 can be used, such as depicted in FIGS. 1A, 4, and 11, preferably including emitters 122, such as for example LEDs or reflective spheres for providing a positive indication of movement to the surgical navigation system during a procedure.

Also rigidly attached to the central post 150, as part of the superstructure 20 preferably at a location closer to the skin, or possibly collocated with or also performing the function of the reference arc 120, is a fiducial array 170, which can be of various different shapes, such as, for example the H-shaped frame 170 depicted in FIG. 2, the W-shaped frame 170' as depicted in FIG. 3, the U-shaped frame 170'' as depicted in FIG. 4 or the X-shaped frame 120', 170''' depicted in FIG. 5 (depicting a structure that is both a fiducial array and a reference arc). As depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3, this array can include fiducial points 29 or spheres 17, rigidly attached to fiducial array 170, 170' and is, for example, as depicted in FIG. 3, substantially in the shape of spheres 17 and of a material detectable by the CAT scan or MRI, preferably titanium or aluminum. This fiducial array such as 170 indicates to the surgical navigation system the location of the bone structure to which the clamp 30 and central post 150 are attached by touching a pointed surgical tracker to fiducial points 29 or a cup-shaped probe to fiducial spheres 17, thereby indicating the center of the fiducial to the surgical navigation controller 114. The array 170 and central post 150 are also attached to the clamp 30, as described above, in such a way that they can be removed and replaced in the same geometric orientation and location, for example, by means of a uniquely shaped interface, for example, a triangle, or a single unique shape or a combination of unique angles or pins with the clamp 30 such that the post 150 can only be reinserted the same way it was removed.

Additionally, the fiducial array 170, can be located at various heights on the post 150 to accomodate variations in patient tissue depth and size, preferably as close to the patient's body as possible, and then fixed at that specific height by the use of pins or indents matched to holes 19 (shown in FIG. 2) in the central post 150 or by placing the rods 39 of H-shaped array 170 in different holes 31. The fiducial array 170 also has, for example, divots 29 (shown in FIG. 2) shaped to interface with an instrument such as a surgical pointer 130 which can touch that divot 29 to register the location of the divot 29 and, thus, the location of the fiducial array 170 and likewise the spinal element in the surgical navigation system. Multiple divots can be registered to further increase accuracy of the registration system. In one preferred embodiment of the array, the fiducials 17 or 29 can be mounted in a manner such that they can be adjusted, for example by mounting them on a rotatable or collapsible arm 66 (as depicted in FIG. 3) that pivots and folds together, to get the maximum distance between fiducials while not dramatically increasing the field of view required at the time of scanning.

Alternatively, rather than using clamp 30, a screw 42 and rigid wire 45 attachment, as depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6, may be used to rigidly attach the central post of the superstructure 20 to a body element, such as, for example, a vertebrae. As depicted in FIG. 6, screw 42 is screwed into the spinal process of spinal element 100. A rigid wire 45, post, or other sufficiently rigid fastener such as for example a Kirschner wire (K-wire), is inserted through the cannulation in the center of post 150 and the screw 42 or is otherwise fixed to the screw 42, and exits the tip of the screw 42 at some angle, and is also implanted into the spinal element 100 to prevent the screw 42 from rotating in either direction.

Another embodiment for preventing the superstructure 20 from rotating as depicted in FIGS. 10 and 11 includes the insertion of a screw 85 through a cannulated tube 86 which has teeth 89 in the end (or V-shaped end) that would bite into the tip of the spinous process, preventing rotation.

Having described the preferred embodiment of this apparatus of the present system, the method of using this apparatus to practice the invention of registering a single vertebrae will now be discussed. The operation of a surgical navigating system is generally well known and is described in PCT/US95/12894. In the preferred method of operation, clamp 30 of FIG. 2 or screw 42 and K-Wire 45 of FIG. 5 are implanted percutaneously through a small incision in the skin and rigidly attached to the spinal process. This attachment occurs with the clamp 30, by driving the blades 32 of the clamp 30 together to hold the spinous process rigidly. The central post 150 is then rigidly fixed to the clamp 30 or screw 42 and the fiducial array 170 is rigidly fixed to the central post 150. The patient is then scanned and imaged with a CAT scan or MRI with a field of view sufficiently large to display the spinal anatomy and the clamp 30 or screw 42 and the fiducial array 170. This scan is loaded into the surgical navigation system processor 104.

After scanning the patient, the array 120 and post 150 can be removed from the patient, while leaving in place the rigidly connected clamp 30 or screw 42. For example, as depicted in FIGS. 4D and 4E, a foot 55 located below array 170'' engages with shoe 56 and rigidly connected by screws 57 and 58. Before the surgical procedure, the post 150, array 120 and other remaining portions of the superstructure 20, once removed, may be sterilized. The patient is then moved to the operating room or similar facility from, for example, the scanning room.

Once in the operating room, the patient may be positioned in an apparatus, such as, for example, a spinal surgery frame 125 to help keep the spinal elements in a particular position and relatively motionless. The superstructure 20 is then replaced on the clamp 30 or screw 42 in a precise manner to the same relative position to the spinal elements as it was in the earlier CAT scan or MRI imaging. The reference arc 120 is fixed to the starburst or other interface connector 60 on the central post 150 which is fixed to the clamp 30 or screw 42. The operator, for example a surgeon, then touches an instrument with a tracking emitter such as a surgical pointer 130 with emitters 195 to the divots 29 on the fiducial array 170 to register the location of the array 170 and, thus, because the spinal process is fixed to the fiducial array 170, the location of the spinal element is also registered in the surgical navigation system.

Once the superstructure 20 is placed back on the patient, any instrument 130 fitted with tracking emitters thereon such as, for example, a drill or screw driver, can be tracked in space relative to the spine in the surgical navigation system without further surgical exposure of the spine. The position of the instrument 130 is determined by the user stepping on a foot pedal 116 to begin tracking the emitter array 190. The emitters 195 generate infrared signals to be picked up by camera digitizer array 110 and triangulated to determine the position of the instrument 130. Additionally, other methods may be employed to track reference arcs, pointer probes, and other tracked instruments, such as with reflective spheres, or sound or magnetic emitters, instead of LED's. For example, reflective spheres can reflect infrared light that is emitted from the camera array 110 back to the camera array 110. The relative position of the body part, such as the spinal process is determined in a similar manner, through the use of similar emitters 122 mounted on the reference frame 120 in mechanical communication with the spinal segment. As is well known in this art and described generally in PCT/US95/12894, based upon the relative position of the spinal segment and the instrument 130 (such as by touching a known reference point) the computer would illustrate a preoperative scan--such as the proper CAT scan slice--on the screen of monitor 106 which would indicate the position of the tool 130 and the spinal segment for the area of the spine involved in the medical procedure.

For better access by the operator of various areas near the central post 150, the fiducial array 170 can be removed from the central post 150, by, for example, loosening screw 42 and sliding the array 170 off post 150, leaving the reference arc 120 in place or replacing it after removal of array 170. By leaving the reference arc 120 in place, the registration of the location of the spinal process is maintained. Additionally, the central post 150, reference arc 120, and fiducial array 170 can be removed after the spinal element has been registered leaving only the clamp 30 or screw 42 in place. The entire surgical field can then be sterilized and a sterile post 150 and reference arc 170 fixed to the clamp 30 or screw 42 with the registration maintained.

This surgical navigation system, with spinal element registration maintained, can then be used, for example, to place necessary and desired screws, rods, hooks, plates, wires, and other surgical instruments and implants percutaneously, using image-guided technology. Once the location of the spinal element 100 involved in the procedure is registered, by the process described above, in relation to the image data set and image 105 projected on monitor 106, other instruments 130 and surgical implants can be placed under the patient's skin at locations indicated by the instrument 130 relative to the spinal element 100.

Additionally, the location of other spinal elements, relative to the spinal element 100 containing the fiducial array 170, can be registered in the surgical navigation system by, for example, inserting additional screws 250, rigid wires 260, or other rigid implants or imageable devices into the spinal segment.

For example, as depicted in FIG. 1, and in more detail FIG. 1A, additional screws 250 or rigid and pointed wires 260 are placed in the vertebrae adjacent to the vertebrae containing the clamp 30 and post 150 prior to scanning. On the image 105 provided by monitor 106, the surgeon can see the clamp 30 or screw 42 and fiducial array 170 and also the additional screws 250, wires 260 or other imageable devices. When screws 250 or other devices are used, these screws 250 (as depicted in FIG. 7) may contain a divot 256 or other specially shaped interface on the head 255 so that a pointer probe 130 can be used to point to the head 255 of the screw 250 (or wire) and indicate the orientation of the screw 250 or wire 260 to the surgical navigation system by communicating to the controller 114 or by emission from LEDs 195 on probe 130 to digitizer 110. The image of these additional screws 250 also appear in the scan. Once the patient is then moved to the operating facility, rather than the scanning area, the image of the screw 250 can be compared to the actual position of the screw 250 as indicated by the pointer probe 130 that is touched to the head 255 of the screw 250 or wire 260. If necessary, the operator can manipulate the position of the patient to move the spinal element and thus the location of the screw 250 or wire 260 to realign the spinal elements with the earlier image of the spine. Alternatively, the operator can manipulate the image to correspond to the current position of the spinal segments.

For additional positioning information, the operator can place additional rigid wires 260 or screws 250 into the vertebrae, for example, located at the superior (toward the patient's head) and inferior (towards the patient's feet) ends of the spinal process to more accurately position those vertebrae relative to the other vertebrae and the image data. Additionally, the wires 260 and screws 250 implanted to provide positioning information can also be equipped with emitters, such as, for example, LEDs, to provide additional information to the surgical navigation system on the location of the wire 260 or screw 250, and thus the vertebra to which they are affixed.

Alternatively, the patient can be placed in a position stabilizing device, such as a spinal surgery frame 125 or board, before a scan is taken, and then moved to the operating facility for the procedure, maintaining the spine segments in the same position from the time of scanning until the time of surgery. Alternatively, a fluoroscope can be used to reposition the spinal segments relative to the earlier image from the scan. An ultrasound probe can be used to take real-time images of the spinal segment which can be portrayed by monitor 106 overlayed or superimposed on image 105. Then the operator can manually manipulate the spinal elements and take additional images of these elements with the fluoroscope to, in an iterative fashion, align the spinal elements with the previously scanned image 105.

Alternatively, a clamp 30 or screw 42 and superstructure 20 can be rigidly fixed to each vertebra involved in the surgical or medical procedure to register the position of each vertebra as explained previously for a single vertebra:

After the spinal elements are registered in the spine, various medical and surgical procedures can be performed on that patient. For example, spinal implants, endoscopes, or biopsy probes can be passed into the spine and procedures such as, for example, spinal fusion, manipulation, or disc removal can be performed percutaneously and facilitated by the surgical navigation image-guiding system. Additionally, a radiation dose can be targeted to a specific region of the vertebrae.

One such procedure facilitated by the apparatus and methods described above is the percutaneous insertion of screws and rods, fixed to different vertebra in a spine to stabilize them. Once screws, for example multiaxial screws 250, (as depicted in FIG. 12, before manipulation) are implanted through small incisions they can be manipulated by a head-positioning probe 280. The final position of screws 250 and heads 255 are depicted in FIG. 13. This probe 280, as depicted in FIG. 7, includes a head 285 that mates in a geometrically unique fashion with the head 255 of the screw 250. An emitter, such as for example an LED array 380 on the probe 280, indicates the location and orientation of the screw head 255 to the computer 114 of the surgical navigation system by providing an optical signal received by digitizer 110. The screw head 255 can then be rotatably manipulated under the patient's skin by the head positioning probe 280 to be properly oriented for the receipt of a rod 360 inserted through the rotating head 255. The operator can then plan a path from the head 255 of each screw 250 to the other screws 250 to be connected. Then, with reference now to FIG. 9, an optically tracked rod inserter 245 also equipped with emitters, such as, for example LEDs 247, can be placed through another small incision to mate with and guide a rod 360 through the holes or slots in the screw heads 245, through and beneath various tissues of the patient, with the rod inserter 245, and, therefore, the rod 360, fixed to the inserter 245, being tracked in the surgical navigation system. The operator can also use the computer 114 to determine the required bending angles of the rod 360. For greater visualization, the geometry of the screws 250 could be loaded into the computer 114 and when the position and orientation of the head 255 is given to the computer 114 via the probe 280, the computer 114 could place this geometry onto the image data and three-dimensional model. The rod 360 geometry could also be loaded into the computer 114 and could be visible and shown in real time on monitor 106 as the operator is placing it in the screw heads 255.

In an alternative procedure, one or more plates and/or one or more wires may be inserted instead of one or more rods 360.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention and in construction of this surgical navigation system without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only.

* * * * *