Videoconference device

Bailey , et al. December 7, 2

Patent Grant D937798

U.S. patent number D937,798 [Application Number D/798,155] was granted by the patent office on 2021-12-07 for videoconference device. This patent grant is currently assigned to Plantronics, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Plantronics, Inc.. Invention is credited to Chase Patrick Bailey, Jeremy Jacob D'Ambrosio, John A. Kelley, David Kim, Nicholas W. Paterson, Bowman Wang.


United States Patent D937,798
Bailey ,   et al. December 7, 2021

Videoconference device

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a videoconference device, as shown and described.
Inventors: Bailey; Chase Patrick (Santa Cruz, CA), Wang; Bowman (Corralitos, CA), Paterson; Nicholas W. (Aptos, CA), Kelley; John A. (Santa Cruz, CA), Kim; David (Santa Cruz, CA), D'Ambrosio; Jeremy Jacob (Scotts Valley, CA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Plantronics, Inc.

Santa Cruz

CA

US
Assignee: Plantronics, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA)
Appl. No.: D/798,155
Filed: July 6, 2021

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29709231 Oct 11, 2019 D927441

Current U.S. Class: D14/130; D16/208
Current International Class: 1403
Field of Search: ;D14/496,125,128,129,130,140,142,149,159,168,204,214,225,226,240,242,299 ;D16/200,202,203,208,218,219,221,230,232,235,237 ;D10/104.1,106.6

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D193271 July 1962 Noyes
D400549 November 1998 Wakefield
D441000 April 2001 Vanderwilt et al.
D470873 February 2003 Hovanky et al.
D471219 March 2003 Hovanky et al.
D471573 March 2003 Hovanky et al.
D535676 January 2007 Dayan
D615888 May 2010 Ikeda
D616403 May 2010 Roed
D619485 July 2010 Ikeda
D654942 February 2012 Khamsepoor
D655690 March 2012 Yagi
D664579 July 2012 Tzeng
D665439 August 2012 Khamsepoor
D665441 August 2012 McManigal
D666163 August 2012 Hsu
D669111 October 2012 Ravi
D669883 October 2012 Cheng
D669884 October 2012 Hou
D671909 December 2012 Choi
D674430 January 2013 Inoue
D675660 February 2013 Su
D676829 February 2013 Kaneko
D680569 April 2013 Lee
D682332 May 2013 Wang
D685015 June 2013 Wang
D687082 July 2013 Wang
D692858 November 2013 Millora
D703194 April 2014 Jacobs
D709481 July 2014 Liu
D715769 October 2014 McManigal
D716360 October 2014 Schechter
D734804 July 2015 Chung
D735150 July 2015 Baldwin
D750601 March 2016 Williams
D750681 March 2016 Takami
D759621 June 2016 Maxwell
D759630 June 2016 Huang
D788725 June 2017 Thompkin et al.
D803174 November 2017 Coffey
D803805 November 2017 Coffey
D806055 December 2017 Fischer
D826213 August 2018 Kim
D827596 September 2018 Hou
D836581 December 2018 Andresen
D851633 June 2019 Nakano
D852774 July 2019 Sugiura
D853356 July 2019 Werle
D861640 October 2019 Werle
D861642 October 2019 Werle et al.
D865029 October 2019 Fook
D865839 November 2019 Hasegawa
D896195 September 2020 Zhang
D905778 December 2020 Lenz
D906278 December 2020 Laine
D907595 January 2021 Duys
D918855 May 2021 Carbone
D924299 July 2021 Gartrell
2021/0132467 May 2021 Okunami

Other References

Videoconferencing units. EU 005125515-0002. (Design--.COPYRGT. Questel) orbit.com. [online PDF] 5 pgs. Print Date May 17, 2018 [Retrieved Jan. 8, 2021] https://www.orbit.com/export/QPTUJ214/pdf2/b76c2456-3d74-4b12-8bbb-- 739f310a7523-185625.pdf. cited by examiner.

Primary Examiner: Fast Horse; Marie D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Blank Rome LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a videoconference device, showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof.

FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 8 is another front elevational view thereof, shown mounted on an environmental stand and in a state of use with illumination along the upper edge visor;

FIG. 9 is another right side elevational view thereof, shown mounted on an environmental stand and in a state of use with illumination along the upper edge visor;

FIG. 10 is another front elevational view thereof, optionally mounted above a screen; and,

FIG. 11 is yet another front elevational view thereof, optionally mounted below a screen.

The long dashed broken lines seen in FIGS. 8, 9, 10, and 11 showing the stand and screen depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claim, while all other short dashed broken lines depict portions of the videoconference device that form no part of the claimed design.

The oblique lines inside the bezel of FIGS. 1-2, 8, and 10-11 depict a transparent covering of the camera lens.

The broken lines consisting of long and short dashes depicted in FIGS. 1, 3-7, and 9 represent an unclaimed boundaries of the claimed design.

The short lines emanating from the upper edge visor seen in FIGS. 8 and 9 depict an illuminated state of use that applies to an embodiment of the claimed design.

* * * * *

References


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed