U.S. patent number D927,441 [Application Number D/709,231] was granted by the patent office on 2021-08-10 for videoconference device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Plantronics, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Plantronics, Inc.. Invention is credited to Chase Patrick Bailey, Jeremy Jacob D'Ambrosio, John A. Kelley, David Kim, Nicholas W. Paterson, Bowman Wang.
United States Patent |
D927,441 |
Bailey , et al. |
August 10, 2021 |
Videoconference device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a videoconference device, as shown
and described.
Inventors: |
Bailey; Chase Patrick (Santa
Cruz, CA), Wang; Bowman (Corralitos, CA), Paterson;
Nicholas W. (Aptos, CA), Kelley; John A. (Santa Cruz,
CA), Kim; David (Santa Cruz, CA), D'Ambrosio; Jeremy
Jacob (Scotts Valley, CA) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Plantronics, Inc. |
Santa Cruz |
CA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Plantronics, Inc. (Santa Cruz,
CA)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/709,231 |
Filed: |
October 11, 2019 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D14/130;
D16/208 |
Current International
Class: |
1403 |
Field of
Search: |
;D14/496,125,128,129,130,140,142,149,159,168,204,214,225,226,240,242,299
;D16/200,202,203,208,218,219,221,230,232,235,237
;D10/104.1,106.6 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Videoconferencing units. EU 005125515-0002. (Design--.COPYRGT.
Questel) orbit.com. [online PDF] 5 pgs. Print Date May 17, 2018
[Retrieved Jan. 8, 2021]
https://www.orbit.com/export/QPTUJ214/pdf2/b76c2456-3d74-4b12-8bbb--
739f310a7523-185625.pdf. cited by examiner.
|
Primary Examiner: Fast Horse; Marie D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Blank Rome LLP
Description
This application is filed concurrently with the U.S. Design
application Ser. No. 29/709,230 and entitled "Videoconference
Device" by Bowman Wang et al., which is incorporated herein by
reference in its entirety.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a videoconference device, showing a
first embodiment of our new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 7 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 8 is another front elevational view thereof, shown mounted on
an environmental stand and in a state of use with illumination
along the upper edge visor;
FIG. 9 is another right side elevational view thereof, shown
mounted on an environmental stand and in a state of use with
illumination along the upper edge visor;
FIG. 10 is another front elevational view thereof, optionally
mounted above a screen;
FIG. 11 is yet another front elevational view thereof, optionally
mounted below a screen;
FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a videoconference device, showing
a second embodiment of our new design;
FIG. 13 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 14 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 15 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 16 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 17 is a right side elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 18 is a left side elevational view thereof.
The long dashed broken lines seen in FIGS. 8, 9, 10, and 11 showing
the stand and screen depict environmental subject matter only and
form no part of the claim, while all other short dashed broken
lines depict portions of the videoconference device that form no
part of the claimed design.
The oblique lines inside the bezel of FIGS. 1-2, 8, 10-11, and
12-13 depict a transparent covering of the camera lens.
The short lines emanating from the upper edge visor seen in FIGS. 8
and 9 depict an illuminated state of use that applies to both
embodiments of the claimed design.
The portions shown in a pattern of stipple in FIGS. 12-18 depict
areas of contrasting appearance.
* * * * *
References