Case for portable electronic computing device

Chan , et al. June 15, 2

Patent Grant D922392

U.S. patent number D922,392 [Application Number D/763,126] was granted by the patent office on 2021-06-15 for case for portable electronic computing device. This patent grant is currently assigned to PIONEER SQUARE BRANDS, INC.. The grantee listed for this patent is Pioneer Square Brands, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jaimie Emerald Chan, Michael Cooper Ferren, Megan Elizabeth Zumel Manzano, Brian Lewis Piper.


United States Patent D922,392
Chan ,   et al. June 15, 2021

Case for portable electronic computing device

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a case for portable electronic computing device, as shown and described.
Inventors: Chan; Jaimie Emerald (Renton, WA), Ferren; Michael Cooper (Camas, WA), Manzano; Megan Elizabeth Zumel (Seattle, WA), Piper; Brian Lewis (Seattle, WA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Pioneer Square Brands, Inc.

Seattle

WA

US
Assignee: PIONEER SQUARE BRANDS, INC. (McLean, VA)
Appl. No.: D/763,126
Filed: December 21, 2020

Current U.S. Class: D14/440
Current International Class: 1402
Field of Search: ;D14/440,447,250 ;206/45.23,320,45.2 ;361/679.55 ;294/25 ;224/218 ;455/575.8

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D647526 October 2011 Vandiver et al.
D649144 November 2011 Fathollahi
D675210 January 2013 Kim
D688669 August 2013 Akana et al.
D703672 April 2014 Kim et al.
D708621 July 2014 Gifford
D728579 May 2015 Mecchella et al.
D763856 August 2016 Moore
D766249 September 2016 Veltz et al.
D776122 January 2017 Akana
D776123 January 2017 Akana
D795880 August 2017 Akana
D799491 October 2017 Barnard et al.
D804486 December 2017 Nyholm
D806713 January 2018 Wright
D808395 January 2018 Fenton
D812620 March 2018 Cheng
D819644 June 2018 Wright
D825199 August 2018 Stephani et al.
D834582 November 2018 Zhuang
10148307 December 2018 Shannon, III
D837796 January 2019 Kim et al.
D841012 February 2019 Kim et al.
D841013 February 2019 Ferren et al.
D841655 February 2019 Xie
D850454 June 2019 Kim et al.
D851648 June 2019 Tan
D868071 November 2019 Liu
D868788 December 2019 Weng
D868791 December 2019 Weng
D874467 February 2020 Piper
D877509 March 2020 Kilkenny
D885402 May 2020 Lei
D888063 June 2020 Chan
D888720 June 2020 Moore
D892805 August 2020 Piper
D892806 August 2020 Manzano et al.
D895630 September 2020 Piper et al.
D902215 November 2020 Quan
D902934 November 2020 Manzano et al.
D906341 December 2020 Jiao
2011/0297566 December 2011 Gallagher
2012/0170212 July 2012 Gallouzi
2013/0222139 August 2013 Gouge
2019/0142992 May 2019 Davidson
2019/0144163 May 2019 Lim
2019/0275714 September 2019 Kanoh
Primary Examiner: Underwood; Cynthia R
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Grandview Law

Description



FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a case for portable electronic computing device showing our new design.

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof.

FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof.

FIG. 4 is a right elevational view thereof.

FIG. 5 is a left elevational view thereof.

FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.

The features shown in broken lines in the drawing figures depict features that form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed