Orthodontic distalizer

Voudouris May 11, 2

Patent Grant D919097

U.S. patent number D919,097 [Application Number D/687,426] was granted by the patent office on 2021-05-11 for orthodontic distalizer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Spartan Orthodontics Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Spartan Orthodontics Inc.. Invention is credited to John Voudouris.


United States Patent D919,097
Voudouris May 11, 2021

Orthodontic distalizer

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an orthodontic distalizer, as shown.
Inventors: Voudouris; John (Toronto, CA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Spartan Orthodontics Inc.

Toronto

N/A

CA
Assignee: Spartan Orthodontics Inc. (Toronto, CA)
Appl. No.: D/687,426
Filed: April 12, 2019

Current U.S. Class: D24/180
Current International Class: 2402
Field of Search: ;D24/152-154,176-182,155,156,227-229,234,133-135,144-146,151,107,108,110.5,184,185,209,210,223-226,230 ;D29/108 ;D6/513,514,515

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
4045871 September 1977 Nelson
5564920 October 1996 Klapper
5904479 May 1999 Staples
6241517 June 2001 Williams
6328745 December 2001 Ascherman
6402510 June 2002 Williams
D545445 June 2007 Klein
D555242 November 2007 Massad
D595852 July 2009 Wilkens
D617455 June 2010 Mori
D669176 October 2012 Frey
D671641 November 2012 Fritzinger
8882499 November 2014 White
9011145 April 2015 Hang
9072568 July 2015 Kook
D738513 September 2015 Coreil
D746462 December 2015 Mujwid
D751208 March 2016 Voudouris
9351810 May 2016 Moon
D764058 August 2016 Howard
9402696 August 2016 Radmall
D767760 September 2016 Suwito
D784531 April 2017 Malcolm
D799041 October 2017 Kim
D802145 November 2017 Voudouris
D803404 November 2017 Longley
D812225 March 2018 Kaupp
10004574 June 2018 Yousefian
D829904 October 2018 Piferi
D846122 April 2019 Pintor
D850619 June 2019 Saubers
D857209 August 2019 Day
10413386 September 2019 Moon
10478270 November 2019 Yousefian
D870293 December 2019 Yukita
D881382 April 2020 Chang
10646308 May 2020 Yousefian
2002/0031741 March 2002 Williams
2002/0172909 November 2002 Williams
2005/0032015 February 2005 McSurdy, Jr.
2010/0261130 October 2010 Williams
2012/0109051 May 2012 Harrell
2013/0071802 March 2013 Lee
2014/0170585 June 2014 Parker
2016/0008094 January 2016 Jessop
2016/0081768 March 2016 Kopelman
2016/0120622 May 2016 Montalban
2017/0007367 January 2017 Li
2017/0304108 October 2017 Simonetti
2018/0153649 June 2018 Wu
2018/0318048 November 2018 Voudouris
2018/0333227 November 2018 Haas
2019/0159872 May 2019 Atlan
2019/0159873 May 2019 Kaveh
Primary Examiner: Nelson; T Chase
Assistant Examiner: Gross; Kelly L
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McMillan LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an orthodontic distalizer showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is a rear elevational view thereof.

The broken lines of FIG. 7 illustrate portions of the orthodontic distalizer that form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *

Patent Diagrams and Documents

D00000


D00001


D00002


D00003


D00004


XML


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed