U.S. patent number D900,178 [Application Number D/684,302] was granted by the patent office on 2020-10-27 for spool for filament of a three-dimensional printer. This patent grant is currently assigned to MakerBot Industries, LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is MakerBot Industries, LLC. Invention is credited to Vishnu Anantha, Michael Joseph Kobida, Mark Palmer.
United States Patent | D900,178 |
Anantha , et al. | October 27, 2020 |
Inventors: | Anantha; Vishnu (Brooklyn, NY), Palmer; Mark (San Jose, CA), Kobida; Michael Joseph (Lake Barrington, IL) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
Assignee: | MakerBot Industries, LLC
(Brooklyn, NY) |
||||||||||
Appl. No.: | D/684,302 | ||||||||||
Filed: | March 20, 2019 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/138 |
Current International Class: | 1509 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/122,135,138,141 ;D18/14,19,50,54,54.1,55,59 |
2144723 | January 1939 | Howsam |
2479946 | August 1949 | Lofgren |
3104077 | September 1963 | Struble |
3266749 | August 1966 | Christian et al. |
D227975 | July 1973 | Diamond |
D240192 | June 1976 | Balmar, Jr. |
D272485 | February 1984 | Philips |
D281482 | November 1985 | Suzuki |
D300405 | March 1989 | Kuntze |
D337511 | July 1993 | Donaldson |
D341769 | November 1993 | Donaldson |
D408720 | April 1999 | Sheng |
D429997 | August 2000 | Zeman |
D436520 | January 2001 | Bulman |
6715710 | April 2004 | Russell et al. |
6991197 | January 2006 | Cox et al. |
D527041 | August 2006 | Nagaoka et al. |
D545561 | July 2007 | Vandecasteele |
D557118 | December 2007 | Linginfelter |
D557119 | December 2007 | Laga |
D598733 | August 2009 | Taatjes et al. |
D606845 | December 2009 | Taatjes et al. |
D618086 | June 2010 | Taatjes et al. |
D623927 | September 2010 | Gu et al. |
D628466 | December 2010 | Taatjes et al. |
D673090 | December 2012 | Lemke |
D705643 | May 2014 | Siboni et al. |
D709536 | July 2014 | Yoshimura |
D709538 | July 2014 | Mizukami |
D709539 | July 2014 | Kuwabara |
D730952 | June 2015 | Siboni |
D740107 | October 2015 | Armani |
D815163 | April 2018 | Savill, Jr. |
2014069326 | Apr 2014 | JP | |||
Engineering360. Link: https://insights.globalspec.com/article/12705/a-weather-resistant-alterna- tive-to-abs. Sep. 27, 2019. A weather resistant alternative to ABS. (Year: 2019). cited by examiner . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/467,097, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2014", 9 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/467,099, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2015", 11 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,433, Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2015", 8 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,433, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2015", 12 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,433, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2015", 5 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,434, Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2015", 6 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,434, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2015", 9 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/478,434, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 5, 2015", 8 pages. cited by applicant . "U.S. Appl. No. 29/684,126, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2020", 12 pages. cited by applicant. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.