Microfluidic chip with microchannels
Thompson, II , et al.
U.S. patent number D888,273 [Application Number D/675,951] was granted by the patent office on 2020-06-23 for microfluidic chip with microchannels. This patent grant is currently assigned to EMULATE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Emulate, Inc.. Invention is credited to Lewis Rowe, Guy Robert Thompson, II, Norman Wen.
| United States Patent | D888,273 |
| Thompson, II , et al. | June 23, 2020 |
Microfluidic chip with microchannels
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a microfluidic chip with microchannels, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Thompson, II; Guy Robert (Watertown, MA), Wen; Norman (West Roxbury, MA), Rowe; Lewis (La Verne, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | EMULATE, Inc. (Boston,
MA) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/675,951 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | January 7, 2019 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29576811 | Sep 7, 2016 | D842493 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/224 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D13/180,182,184,199 ;D24/216,224,225,226,227,229,230,231,232 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D296193 | June 1988 | Keeler |
| 6001231 | December 1999 | Kopf-Sill |
| 6176962 | January 2001 | Soane |
| 6495104 | December 2002 | Unno |
| 6536477 | March 2003 | O'Connor |
| 6755211 | June 2004 | O'Connor |
| 7112444 | September 2006 | Beebe |
| 7391020 | June 2008 | Bousse |
| 7608160 | October 2009 | Zhou |
| 8763642 | July 2014 | Vangbo |
| 9561506 | February 2017 | Taylor |
| 9670541 | June 2017 | Mehta |
| D816861 | May 2018 | Levner |
| D842493 | March 2019 | Levner |
| 2002/0134907 | September 2002 | Benett |
| 2002/0187074 | December 2002 | O'Connor |
| 2004/0211054 | October 2004 | Morse |
| 2005/0026134 | February 2005 | Miller |
| 2006/0228749 | October 2006 | Wang |
| 2007/0166199 | July 2007 | Zhou |
| 2009/0098659 | April 2009 | Abhyankar |
| 2009/0234332 | September 2009 | Borenstein |
| 2009/0305326 | December 2009 | Beebe |
| 2011/0079513 | April 2011 | Stelzle |
| 2011/0082563 | April 2011 | Charest |
| 2011/0120562 | May 2011 | Tan |
| 2011/0250585 | October 2011 | Ingber |
| 2012/0070878 | March 2012 | Fink |
| 2012/0318726 | December 2012 | Charest |
| 2013/0019688 | January 2013 | Tung |
| 2013/0288292 | October 2013 | Meyvantsson |
| 2014/0234954 | August 2014 | Lee |
| 2014/0273223 | September 2014 | Cho |
| 2016/0097028 | April 2016 | Tung |
| 2016/0136646 | May 2016 | Ingber |
| 2016/0136895 | May 2016 | Beyer |
| 2016/0229683 | August 2016 | Phommarine |
| 2016/0313306 | October 2016 | Lngber; Donald E |
| 2017/0022464 | January 2017 | Novak |
| 2017/0058257 | March 2017 | Levner |
| 2017/0121659 | May 2017 | Hinojosa |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Medlen & Carroll, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an ornamental microfluidic chip with microfluidic channels; and,
FIG. 2 is a perspective view, thereof.
The broken lines indicate features that do not form part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
D00000
D00001
D00002
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 