Headset

Description

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the headset, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 2 is a front view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 3 is back view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 4 is a right side view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 5 is a left side view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 6 is a top view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position,

FIG. 8 is a back perspective view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in a social position,

FIG. 9 is a front perspective view of the headset, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 10 is a front view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 11 is back view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 12 is a right side view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 13 is a left side view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 14 is a top view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design,

FIG. 15 is a bottom view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in an in-use position; and,

FIG. 16 is a back view of the headset of FIG. 1, with the glasses in a social position, the sole difference being the elimination of the eye box from the design.

The broken lines in FIGS. 1-16 are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design or a specified embodiment thereof.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a headset, substantially as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Young; Michael Alexander (Belmont, CA), Higham; Corey David (Cupertino, CA), Backes; Samuel Benjamin (San Jose, CA), Fitzgerald; Quinn Jerome Odette (San Francisco, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Avegant Corp. Belmont CA US
Assignee:	Avegant Corp. (San Mateo, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/589,836
Filed:	January 4, 2017

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/372
Current International Class:	1402
Field of Search:	;D14/372,496,432,371,125,126,129,299 ;D16/300-342 ;351/158,153,144 ;345/7-9,905 ;455/344 ;348/115,53,121,739

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D719953	December 2014	Nokuo
D753111	April 2016	Fei
D785619	May 2017	Su
D791125	July 2017	Sullivan
D791129	July 2017	Sullivan
D798298	September 2017	Haber
D800117	October 2017	Yee
D800726	October 2017	Su
D801970	November 2017	Sullivan
D805074	December 2017	Hu
D806075	December 2017	Chen
D806710	January 2018	Chen
D807354	January 2018	Yee
D807355	January 2018	Tabata
D807356	January 2018	Chou
D807357	January 2018	Wu
D807358	January 2018	Huang
D810743	February 2018	Yee
D813233	March 2018	Lee
D815637	April 2018	Li
D819635	June 2018	Miller
D827015	August 2018	Chen
D827642	September 2018	Liu
D834017	November 2018	Beynel
D838718	January 2019	Chiang
D839269	January 2019	Wang
D839872	February 2019	Wei
D840399	February 2019	Miller
10212517	February 2019	Beltran
D842300	March 2019	Chiang
D848420	May 2019	Boger
D849003	May 2019	Chiang
D860301	September 2019	Chen
2012/0033142	February 2012	Thomson

Primary Examiner: Murphy; Austin
Attorney, Agent or Firm: HIPLegal LLP Szepesi; Judith

Images