Electronic board

Description

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of an electronic board showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left-side view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a right-side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a top view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 9 is another front perspective view thereof rotated 90.degree. to an alternate position;

FIG. 10 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 11 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 12 is a left-side view thereof;

FIG. 13 is a right-side view thereof;

FIG. 14 is a top view thereof;

FIG. 15 is a bottom view thereof; and,

FIG. 16 is a rear perspective view thereof.

The broken lines in the figures depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for an electronic board, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Park; Jeongwoo (Seoul, KR), Won; Donghee (Seoul, KR), Ann; Sungjin (Seoul, KR), Cho; Juwon (Seoul, KR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Suwon-si N/A KR
Assignee:	Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Suwon-si, KR)
Appl. No.:	D/637,270
Filed:	February 15, 2018

---

Foreign Application Priority Data

---

Aug 28, 2017 [KR]			30-2017-0040019

Current U.S. Class:	D19/113
Current International Class:	1906
Field of Search:	;D6/300-314 ;D19/113,114 ;D20/27,29,42,43 ;D14/341,342,371,373,374,448,450

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D424068	May 2000	Takemasa
D586769	February 2009	Kita
D607854	January 2010	Sagawa
D637651	May 2011	Hase
D638388	May 2011	Fujii
D647905	November 2011	Lee
D656472	March 2012	Iida
D657791	April 2012	Kim
D658140	April 2012	Hwangbo
D661268	June 2012	Itou
D664541	July 2012	Kim
D665389	August 2012	Lu
D667826	September 2012	Lee
D667827	September 2012	Park
D669077	October 2012	McManigal
D680087	April 2013	Fujii
D681583	May 2013	Park
D684573	June 2013	Chen
D686583	July 2013	Yoo
D686585	July 2013	Yoon
8517329	August 2013	Nash
D691573	October 2013	Iida
D691976	October 2013	Hotta
D697884	January 2014	Lee
D700155	February 2014	McManigal
D703627	April 2014	Son
D709843	July 2014	Inoue
D710357	August 2014	Quijano
D721364	January 2015	Huh
D723483	March 2015	Lee
D725057	March 2015	Seo
D727893	April 2015	Lee
D727897	April 2015	Stevenson
D728567	May 2015	Hwangbo
D729798	May 2015	Hwangbo
D729799	May 2015	Jung
D730353	May 2015	Hwangbo
D730896	June 2015	Hwangbo
D730897	June 2015	Hwangbo
D730898	June 2015	Hwangbo
D732030	June 2015	Hwangbo
D732031	June 2015	Hwangbo
D738378	September 2015	Kim
D738875	September 2015	Seoc
D738879	September 2015	Hwangbo
D738880	September 2015	Hwangbo
D738881	September 2015	Hwangbo
D750585	March 2016	Kang
D751519	March 2016	Ma
D752533	March 2016	Yamaguchi
D753082	April 2016	Tanimura
D754979	May 2016	Starck
D765049	August 2016	Tanimura
D767517	September 2016	Gomi
D769837	October 2016	Kim
9669650	June 2017	Shen
D791121	July 2017	Collins
D809600	February 2018	Anderson
D812027	March 2018	Debaigue
D818976	May 2018	Hotta

Other References

"Whiteboard price six boutique recommended." [2015] www.17house.com Dec. 28, 2015 <http://news.17house.com/article-115411-1.html>. cited by applicant . "Interactive smart tablet VS interactive whiteboard." [2013] www.blog.sina.com Sep. 22, 2013 <http://blog-sina.com.cn/s/blog_b6e3f9100101p5ms.html>. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Albert; Elizabeth A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: NSIP Law

Images