Dual blade lawnmower
Suchoza , et al. July 9, 2
U.S. patent number D853,453 [Application Number D/619,134] was granted by the patent office on 2019-07-09 for dual blade lawnmower. This patent grant is currently assigned to Sunrise Global Marketing LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is Sunrise Global Marketing LLC. Invention is credited to Jianlong Chen, Nick Suchoza.
| United States Patent | D853,453 |
| Suchoza , et al. | July 9, 2019 |
Dual blade lawnmower
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a dual blade lawnmower therefor, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Suchoza; Nick (Huntersville, NC), Chen; Jianlong (Jiangsu, CN) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Sunrise Global Marketing LLC
(Mooresville, NC) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/619,134 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | September 27, 2017 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D15/31 |
| Current International Class: | 1503 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/10,11,13-17,28,22-26,30,31 ;D12/173 ;56/13.3,13.4,15.8,15.9,320.1 ;180/89.1,89.12,900,69.2,68.1,69.1 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D346810 | May 1994 | Schulz |
| D361771 | August 1995 | Ledingham |
| 5493851 | February 1996 | Katzer |
| D375963 | November 1996 | Braun |
| 5676117 | October 1997 | Williams |
| D390576 | February 1998 | Shimamura |
| 5910091 | June 1999 | Iida |
| D421265 | February 2000 | Ohsumi |
| D422605 | April 2000 | Danthois |
| D424070 | May 2000 | Danthois |
| D426836 | June 2000 | Sirois |
| D449840 | October 2001 | Concari |
| D450064 | November 2001 | Concari |
| D456030 | April 2002 | Maeda |
| D460973 | July 2002 | Jong |
| D489734 | May 2004 | Lin |
| D497918 | November 2004 | Osborne |
| D508923 | August 2005 | Henssler |
| D508924 | August 2005 | Henssler |
| RE39338 | October 2006 | Stratford |
| D544501 | June 2007 | Chung Lee |
| D581951 | December 2008 | Bochmann |
| D610167 | February 2010 | Martin |
| D620029 | July 2010 | Baetica |
| D620030 | July 2010 | Baetica |
| D622291 | August 2010 | Martin |
| D627371 | November 2010 | Baetica |
| D627372 | November 2010 | Baetica |
| D628598 | December 2010 | Neeley |
| D646698 | October 2011 | Park |
| D648354 | November 2011 | Hattori |
| D649166 | November 2011 | Thackery |
| D652846 | January 2012 | Stratford |
| D653265 | January 2012 | Stratford |
| D665823 | August 2012 | Hannig |
| D723068 | February 2015 | Qiu |
| D725155 | March 2015 | McKay |
| D726227 | April 2015 | Aglassinger |
| D781348 | March 2017 | Pellenc |
| D784420 | April 2017 | Zhang |
| D785048 | April 2017 | Zhang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dorton & Willis, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a dual blade lawnmower showing our new design.
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof.
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof.
FIG. 6 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the dual blade lawnmower. The portion inside the broken lines is shown in de-emphasized and half-tone form so as to illustrate environmental structures and forms no part of the claimed invention.
* * * * *
D00000
D00001
D00002
D00003
D00004
D00005
D00006
D00007
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 