Garment

Description

FIG. 1 is a front, left perspective view of a garment showing the present design, shown in a first in-use configuration;

FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a first side view of the garment of FIG. 1 with a first sleeve of the garment in a raised position;

FIG. 4 is a second side view of the garment of FIG. 1 with a second sleeve of the garment in a raised position;

FIG. 5 is a first side view of the garment of FIG. 1 in a second in-use configuration;

FIG. 6 is a first side view of the garment of FIG. 1 in a third in-use configuration;

FIG. 7 is a first side view of the garment of FIG. 1 in a fourth in-use configuration;

FIG. 8 is a back view thereof;

FIG. 9 is a magnified view of the area indicated on FIG. 8; and,

FIG. 10 is a magnified view of the area indicated in FIG. 1.

The broken lines with alternating long and short broken lines, immediately adjacent to the shaded area, represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The unshaded regions represent unclaimed portions of the garment and form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines, which include even-length segments, that show the remainder of the garment or that are within the shaded area, are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines comprising an alternating pattern of two dashes separated by a dot are used to indicate the boundaries of a magnified view as shown in FIG. 9, and FIG. 10 and form no part of the claimed design. The contrast shading on the claimed portion is provided only to indicate the character and/or any contour or curvature of the surfaces. It does not indicate color, texture, markings that actually exist thereon, indicia, graphic representations, surface treatment, or any other ornamentation applied to the article.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a garment, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Ingram; Jeffrey K. (Portland, OR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type NIKE, Inc. Beaverton OR US
Assignee:	NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton, OR)
Appl. No.:	D/571,676
Filed:	July 20, 2016

---

Current U.S. Class:	D2/728; D2/731
Current International Class:	0202
Field of Search:	;D2/728,750,759-760,769,782,731 ;D5/1,34

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D99619	May 1936	Daniels
D259746	July 1981	Dahlgard
D294305	February 1988	Meek
D506303	June 2005	Rocha
D527868	September 2006	Wager
D555878	November 2007	Bay
D588783	March 2009	Olstorn
D627950	November 2010	Carpentier
D633690	March 2011	Tronvold
D648924	November 2011	Propst
D662282	June 2012	Meunier-Bouchard
D679072	April 2013	Abbevik et al.
D714525	October 2014	Payne
D744199	December 2015	Roscoe
D745250	December 2015	McClain
D745769	December 2015	Borovicka
D749821	February 2016	McClora
D755478	May 2016	Grosbl
D757397	May 2016	Huang
D758697	June 2016	Clark
D763582	August 2016	McClain
D770129	November 2016	Lomax
D772534	November 2016	Borovicka
D784657	April 2017	Adrovic
D784658	April 2017	Adrovic
D784706	April 2017	McClain
D787160	May 2017	Crowe
D799161	October 2017	Crowe et al.
D800419	October 2017	Ingram
D800425	October 2017	Schneider
2013/0219581	August 2013	Schrimpf
2015/0107062	April 2015	Hayashi
2016/0135527	May 2016	Skurla, III
2016/0295950	October 2016	Schurr
2016/0338415	November 2016	Aihara
2017/0172237	June 2017	Martin

Other References

Ex Parte Quayle Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2017 in Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/571,677, 9 pages. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Webster; Robin V
Assistant Examiner: Thorn, Sr.; James C
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shook, Hardy and Bacon L.L.P.