Electrical motorcycle
Ytterborn , et al. February 20, 2
U.S. patent number D810,629 [Application Number D/576,395] was granted by the patent office on 2018-02-20 for electrical motorcycle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Cake 0 emission AB. The grantee listed for this patent is Cake 0 emission AB. Invention is credited to Jonas Samrelius, Karl Ytterborn, Nils Ytterborn.
| United States Patent | D810,629 |
| Ytterborn , et al. | February 20, 2018 |
Electrical motorcycle
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an electrical motorcycle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Ytterborn; Karl (Stockholm, SE), Ytterborn; Nils (Stockholm, SE), Samrelius; Jonas (Stockholm, SE) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Cake 0 emission AB (Stockholm,
SE) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/576,395 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | September 2, 2016 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Mar 4, 2016 [EM] | 003013507-0001 | |||
| Mar 4, 2016 [EM] | 003013507-0002 | |||
| Mar 4, 2016 [EM] | 003013507-0003 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/110 |
| Current International Class: | 1211 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/110,111,117 ;D21/432,538 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D311507 | October 1990 | Sasaki |
| D368242 | March 1996 | Camfield |
| D384600 | October 1997 | Miwa |
| D385226 | October 1997 | Mogi |
| D387017 | December 1997 | Wakita |
| D430822 | September 2000 | Sakaguchi |
| D431501 | October 2000 | Yamamoto |
| D456315 | April 2002 | Sawabe |
| D482639 | November 2003 | Yamamoto |
| D497329 | October 2004 | Yamamoto |
| D497330 | October 2004 | Fukuyama |
| D513481 | January 2006 | Lin |
| D517956 | March 2006 | Kishi |
| D523783 | June 2006 | Sugimoto |
| D524191 | July 2006 | Sugimoto |
| D526249 | August 2006 | Tanaka |
| D526936 | August 2006 | Maruyama |
| D549136 | August 2007 | Yu |
| D559155 | January 2008 | Sakata |
| D566626 | April 2008 | Sakata |
| D581840 | December 2008 | Ichihara |
| D590302 | April 2009 | Tanaka |
| D594784 | June 2009 | Ichihara |
| D598330 | August 2009 | Miyanishi |
| D603300 | November 2009 | Fukuyama |
| D609609 | February 2010 | Hayashi |
| D609610 | February 2010 | Inose |
| D621301 | August 2010 | Hayashi |
| D632226 | February 2011 | Miyata |
| D640173 | June 2011 | Oyanagi |
| D662857 | July 2012 | Petersson |
| D662858 | July 2012 | Yamazaki |
| D662859 | July 2012 | Matsuoka |
| D665706 | August 2012 | Oyanagi |
| D685682 | July 2013 | Matsumura |
| D698702 | February 2014 | Kubanek |
| D724496 | March 2015 | Takeda |
| D734215 | July 2015 | Forrellad |
| D735086 | July 2015 | Talios |
| D735087 | July 2015 | Iimura |
| D738260 | September 2015 | Akita |
| D738789 | September 2015 | Inose |
| D754567 | April 2016 | Iimura |
| 2005/0029773 | February 2005 | Day |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Tucker Ellis LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front and right side perspective view of the electrical motorcycle showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear and right side perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 