Cotton candy machine
Bond , et al. October 17, 2
U.S. patent number D799,881 [Application Number D/550,987] was granted by the patent office on 2017-10-17 for cotton candy machine. This patent grant is currently assigned to NOSTALGIA PRODUCTS LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is Nostalgia Products LLC. Invention is credited to Gregg Bond, Edward E. Boughton, III.
| United States Patent | D799,881 |
| Bond , et al. | October 17, 2017 |
Cotton candy machine
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for cotton candy machine, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bond; Gregg (Beverly Hills, CA), Boughton, III; Edward E. (Ventura, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | NOSTALGIA PRODUCTS LLC (Green
Bay, WI) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/550,987 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | January 8, 2016 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/323; D7/325 |
| Current International Class: | 3100 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/323,324,325,337,346-347,376,378,384,668-669,688 ;D21/523-525 ;425/9 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4793782 | December 1988 | Sullivan |
| D306389 | March 1990 | Nasui |
| 5145687 | September 1992 | Parker |
| 5498144 | March 1996 | Francis |
| D465966 | November 2002 | Daftari |
| D489505 | May 2004 | Bond |
| D552405 | October 2007 | Bond |
| D641197 | July 2011 | Borin |
| 8376064 | February 2013 | Swegle |
| D712699 | September 2014 | Bond |
| 9004893 | April 2015 | Bond |
| D734637 | July 2015 | Benoit |
| D757485 | May 2016 | Benoit |
| 2004/0185131 | September 2004 | Weiss |
| 2005/0011366 | January 2005 | Kowalski |
| 2006/0042472 | March 2006 | Shore |
| 2007/0031527 | February 2007 | Koike |
| 2013/0202726 | August 2013 | Bond |
| 2016/0353778 | December 2016 | Montoya |
Assistant Examiner: Bajoul; Mehri
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, left side perspective view of our new design.
FIG. 2 is a front, right side perspective view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a bottom, left side perspective view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a bottom, right side perspective view thereof.
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof.
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
FIG. 7 is a left side elevation view thereof.
FIG. 8 is a right side elevation view thereof.
FIG. 9 is a front elevation view thereof.
FIG. 10 is a rear elevation view thereof.
FIG. 11 is a front, left side perspective view of an alternate embodiment of our new design.
FIG. 12 is a front, right side perspective view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 13 is a bottom, left side perspective view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 14 is a bottom, right side perspective view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 15 is a top plan view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 16 is a bottom plan view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 17 is a left side elevation view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 18 is a right side elevation view of the alternate embodiment.
FIG. 19 is a front elevation view of the alternate embodiment; and,
FIG. 20 is a rear elevation view of the alternate embodiment.
In the drawings, the broken lines depict portions of the cotton candy machine which form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 