Mouse

Description

FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a mouse showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is bottom perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front view thereof, the rear view being substantially identical;

FIG. 4 is a side view thereof, the opposite side view being substantially identical;

FIG. 5 is a top view thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a bottom view thereof.

The dashed broken lines illustrate environmental structure and form no part of the claimed design.

The dot-dash broken lines represent boundaries of the claimed design; the dot-dash broken lines themselves form no part of the claimed design, and the portion within the dot-dash broken lines forms no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a mouse, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Andre; Bartley K. (Palo Alto, CA), Coster; Daniel J. (San Francisco, CA), De Iuliis; Daniele (San Francisco, CA), Hankey; M. Evans (San Francisco, CA), Howarth; Richard P. (San Francisco, CA), Ive; Jonathan P. (San Francisco, CA), Jobs; Steven P. (N/A), Kerr; Duncan Robert (San Francisco, CA), Nishibori; Shin (Kailua, HI), Rohrbach; Matthew Dean (San Francisco, CA), Russell-Clarke; Peter (San Francisco, CA), Satzger; Douglas B. (Menlo Park, CA), Stringer; Christopher J. (Woodside, CA), Whang; Eugene Antony (San Francisco, CA), Zorkendorfer; Rico (San Francisco, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Apple Inc. Cupertino CA US
Assignee:	Apple Inc. (Cupertino, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/525,130
Filed:	April 27, 2015

---

Related U.S. Patent Documents

---

	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	29457579	Jun 11, 2013	D729246
	29402287	Jul 16, 2013	D686210
	29345269	Nov 15, 2011	D648724
	29317505	Oct 5, 2010	D624917

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/408
Current International Class:	1402
Field of Search:	;D14/402-411,356,388,389,383-385,417,426 ;345/156-167 ;463/36-38 ;358/471,473 ;273/148B

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D302426	July 1989	Bradley et al.
D313981	January 1991	Yang
D328458	August 1992	Barry
D336900	June 1993	Pfeifer
D348057	June 1994	Bradley
D349688	August 1994	Holbrook
D362431	September 1995	Kaneko et al.
D372908	August 1996	Aeschbacher et al.
D385263	October 1997	Taylor
D386163	November 1997	Cheng
D414483	September 1999	Cox et al.
D418125	December 1999	Jobs et al.
D418753	January 2000	DuBow
6304249	October 2001	Derocher et al.
D454568	March 2002	Andre et al.
6456275	September 2002	Hinckley et al.
D468441	January 2003	Pham
D478908	August 2003	Morisawa
6636198	October 2003	Gross et al.
6639583	October 2003	Bohn
D491184	June 2004	Shimizu
D507573	July 2005	Wang et al.
D521516	May 2006	Murakami
7233318	June 2007	Farag
D545822	July 2007	Murakami
D549228	August 2007	Yamagishi
D571855	June 2008	Law et al.
7397462	July 2008	Wu
D575784	August 2008	Chatterjee et al.
D581929	December 2008	Chatterjee et al.
D591748	May 2009	Hu et al.
D593093	May 2009	Chatterjee et al.
D593095	May 2009	Chatterjee et al.
D593152	May 2009	Hammad et al.
D602236	October 2009	Loveder
D616445	May 2010	Wong et al.
7710397	May 2010	Krah et al.
D624917	October 2010	Andre
D637076	May 2011	Akana
D637189	May 2011	Hemming
D645863	September 2011	Lacotta
D647093	October 2011	Kim et al.
D648724	November 2011	Andre
D649449	November 2011	Akana
D656499	March 2012	Lee
D662096	June 2012	Yu
D667408	September 2012	Lim
8269723	September 2012	Liu
D686210	July 2013	Andre
D688243	August 2013	Widiaman
D689494	September 2013	Widiaman
8704769	April 2014	Hotelling
D715801	October 2014	Lee
D729246	May 2015	Andre
D752013	March 2016	Benedetti
D753659	April 2016	Schoeck
2006/0267941	November 2006	Chen et al.
2007/0080945	April 2007	Huppi

Other References

Office Action in USPTO TB Application Serial No. 85008755. cited by applicant . Response to Office Action in USPTO TM Application Serial No. 85008755. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Murphy; Austin
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Saidman DesignLaw Group, LLC