Electronic device with retractable leg support

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view illustrating a design for an electronic device with retractable leg support in a retracted position according to one embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a bottom view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a top view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a side view thereof;

FIG. 5 is another side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a back view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a perspective view illustrating a design for an electronic device with retractable leg support in an extended position according to one embodiment;

FIG. 9 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 10 is a back view thereof;

FIG. 11 is a side view thereof;

FIG. 12 is another side view thereof;

FIG. 13 is a bottom perspective view thereof; and,

FIG. 14 is a top perspective view thereof.

The broken lines of the FIGURES are for illustration only. The broken lines and the unshaded regions bounded by broken lines of the preceding FIGURES illustrate boundaries and, therefore, form no part of the claimed design. Non-oblique line shading is meant to show contour and not surface ornamentation. Additionally, it should be noted that any of the corners of any of the embodiments shown may be rounded or squared off at various angles based on a particular embodiment.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an electronic device with retractable leg support, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Oakley; Nicholas W. (Portland, OR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Intel Corporation Santa Clara CA US
Assignee:	Intel Corporation (Santa Clara, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/503,768
Filed:	September 29, 2014

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/432
Current International Class:	1402
Field of Search:	;D14/324,328,341-347,411,432,439-446,299 ;D13/218,318,319,321,322,328 ;D8/349,354 ;D19/56 ;361/679.56 ;24/546 ;248/560

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

6031714	February 2000	Ma
6191940	February 2001	Ma
D438777	March 2001	Alecci
7391606	June 2008	Chen et al.
7478788	January 2009	Hsu
D596186	July 2009	Sempliner et al.
D598919	August 2009	Takemasa et al.
D618244	June 2010	Sweet et al.
7841575	November 2010	Sliger
8096517	January 2012	Hamilton
8146869	April 2012	Wang et al.
D686623	July 2013	Bennett et al.
8699213	April 2014	Loi et al.
D709512	July 2014	Wardlaw
8763977	July 2014	Huang et al.
8800786	August 2014	Parkins
D716308	October 2014	Park et al.
8876070	November 2014	Liu et al.
8922995	December 2014	Su
8964382	February 2015	Ashcraft et al.
D729805	May 2015	Bataillou et al.
D734301	July 2015	Inada
2002/0138947	October 2002	Jantschek
2005/0127253	June 2005	Kim
2007/0047188	March 2007	Kim
2007/0159784	July 2007	Chen et al.
2008/0192424	August 2008	Lee
2008/0265109	October 2008	Derry et al.
2009/0278000	November 2009	Hu
2010/0012810	January 2010	Hu
2010/0128458	May 2010	Nagami

Other References

USPTO Nonfinal Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 14/229,842, mailed on Sep. 28, 2015, 15 pages. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Murphy; Austin
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Patent Capital Group