U.S. patent number D728,727 [Application Number D/473,761] was granted by the patent office on 2015-05-05 for rear folding sight for a firearm. This patent grant is currently assigned to Magpul Industries Corporation. The grantee listed for this patent is Magpul Industries Corporation. Invention is credited to Grady Barfoot, Brad Bennett, Yehezkel Eitan, Richard Fitzpatrick, Michael T. Mayberry, Tim Roberts.
United States Patent | D728,727 |
Barfoot , et al. | May 5, 2015 |
Inventors: | Barfoot; Grady (Denver, CO), Eitan; Yehezkel (Fort Lupton, CO), Roberts; Tim (Erie, CO), Fitzpatrick; Richard (Longmont, CO), Mayberry; Michael T. (Denver, CO), Bennett; Brad (Lafayette, CO) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
Assignee: | Magpul Industries Corporation
(Louisville, CO) |
||||||||||
Appl. No.: | D/473,761 | ||||||||||
Filed: | November 26, 2013 |
Current U.S. Class: | D22/109 |
Current International Class: | 2201 |
Field of Search: | ;D22/108-109 ;89/111-113 ;359/399,823,744 ;42/104,105,111-113,116,120,124-126,127-129,141-148,133-140 ;33/227,229 |
1257713 | February 1918 | Johnson |
D235339 | June 1975 | Edstrom |
D354111 | January 1995 | Karppinen |
6779290 | August 2004 | Houtsma |
D526380 | August 2006 | Swan |
7356962 | April 2008 | Swan |
D594083 | June 2009 | Mayberry et al. |
D594084 | June 2009 | Mayberry et al. |
D615144 | May 2010 | Mayberry et al. |
D635634 | April 2011 | Swan |
D637259 | May 2011 | Swan |
8015744 | September 2011 | Swan |
D647158 | October 2011 | Dueck |
D648413 | November 2011 | Mayberry et al. |
D657013 | April 2012 | Swan |
D675281 | January 2013 | Speroni |
D680613 | April 2013 | Fitzpatrick |
D681151 | April 2013 | Fitzpatrick |
8484882 | July 2013 | Haley |
D687915 | August 2013 | Adcock, Jr. |
D704792 | May 2014 | Fitzpatrick et al. |
D705890 | May 2014 | Fitzpatrick et al. |
2003/0140546 | July 2003 | Kay |
2006/0156559 | July 2006 | Forrest |
2007/0130817 | June 2007 | Ballard |
2007/0234625 | October 2007 | Kidd |
2007/0271834 | November 2007 | Keng |
2008/0034638 | February 2008 | Spuhr |
2008/0253110 | October 2008 | Wu |
2012/0180370 | July 2012 | McKinley |
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/410,910, filed Jan. 13, 2012, "PMAG 30M3 Firearm Magazine" by Fitzpatrick. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,155, filed May 4, 2012, "Translucent Magazine for a Firearm" by Fitzpatrick. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/423,116, filed May 29, 2012, "M3 10 Magazine" by Bennett. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/423,117, filed May 29, 2012, "M3 20 Magazine" by Bennett. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/440,787, filed Dec. 27, 2012, "Firearm Magazine" by Mayberry. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/440,889, filed Dec. 28, 2012, "Firearm Magazine" by Kielsmeier. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/440,792, filed Dec. 27, 2012, "Firearm Magazine with Window" by Kielsmeier. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/450,963, filed Mar. 26, 2013, "Magazine for a Firearm" by Nakayama. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/450,964, filed Mar. 26, 2013, "Magazine for a Firearm" by Nakayama. cited by applicant. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.