Video conference endpoint

Description

FIG. 1 is a front, right perspective view from above of a video conference endpoint, according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a front elevation view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a rear elevation view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a right side elevation view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a left side elevation view of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 8 is another front, right perspective view from above of the video conference endpoint, of FIG. 1.

Any portions shown in using dashed lines are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a video conference endpoint, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Aarrestad; Glenn Robert Grismrud (Oslo, NO), Chaubert; Evelyne (San Francisco, CA), Nichols; Eric Wayne (San Francisco, CA), Bender; Shawn Emory (Campbell, CA), Chan; Danny Hon Bun (Fremont, CA), Lu; Torence (Fremont, CA), Nunez; Daniel Casimiro (Sunnyvale, CA), Sanguinet; David Michael (San Jose, CA), Hsieh; Sarah (Los Altos, CA), Wood; Kenneth Douglas (Portola Valley, CA), Cruse; Terri LaBelle (Santa Clara, CA), Richards; Emory Thomas (Sudbury, MA), Harden; Dan (Palo Alto, CA), Whittall; Christopher L. (Los Gatos, CA), Buzzard; Kyle A. (Campbell, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Aarrestad; Glenn Robert Grismrud Chaubert; Evelyne Nichols; Eric Wayne Bender; Shawn Emory Chan; Danny Hon Bun Lu; Torence Nunez; Daniel Casimiro Sanguinet; David Michael Hsieh; Sarah Wood; Kenneth Douglas Cruse; Terri LaBelle Richards; Emory Thomas Harden; Dan Whittall; Christopher L. Buzzard; Kyle A. Oslo San Francisco San Francisco Campbell Fremont Fremont Sunnyvale San Jose Los Altos Portola Valley Santa Clara Sudbury Palo Alto Los Gatos Campbell N/A CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA MA CA CA CA NO US US US US US US US US US US US US US US
Assignee:	Cisco Technology, Inc. (San Jose, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/416,718
Filed:	March 26, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/127
Current International Class:	1403
Field of Search:	;D14/127,129,133,306,132,381,382 ;345/1.3,10,104 ;348/14.07,14.09,51,836,184,325,739,359 ;248/917,918,920,921,922,923,924 ;455/347 ;341/12 ;312/7.2 ;720/600,605 ;D26/52

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

3909525	September 1975	Fagan
D340229	October 1993	Drabczyk et al.
D448024	September 2001	Kim
D558270	December 2007	Beno
D579888	November 2008	Lunde et al.
D581380	November 2008	Derocher et al.
D583781	December 2008	Derocher et al.
D593977	June 2009	Derocher et al.
D610105	February 2010	Graham et al.
7679639	March 2010	Harrell et al.
D613260	April 2010	Derocher et al.
D616403	May 2010	Roed et al.
7710448	May 2010	De Beer et al.
D618644	June 2010	Graham et al.
D623619	September 2010	Roed et al.
D623621	September 2010	Roed et al.
D624514	September 2010	Roed et al.
D626102	October 2010	Buzzard et al.
D626103	October 2010	Buzzard et al.
D628175	November 2010	Desai et al.
D628968	December 2010	Desai et al.
D632008	February 2011	Kim et al.
D634745	March 2011	Park et al.
D649951	December 2011	Roed et al.
8102331	January 2012	Moscovitch
D663707	July 2012	Derocher et al.
D671085	November 2012	Derocher et al.
D679707	April 2013	Aarrestad et al.
8500293	August 2013	Sutton et al.
8659639	February 2014	Baldino et al.
2012/0243200	September 2012	Sutton et al.

Foreign Patent Documents

	ZL201230465124.9		Jul 2013		CN
	ZL201230465123.4		Nov 2013		CN
	1345169-0002		Sep 2012		EP
	1345169-0003		Sep 2012		EP
	1345169-0004		Sep 2012		EP

Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Assistant Examiner: Bennett-Hattan; Eliza
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC