Dry mobile device camera case

Description

FIG. 1 is a front view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 2 is a rear view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 3 is a rear view of the mobile device in the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 4 is a top view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 6 is a left view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 7 is a right view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position;

FIG. 8 is a front view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position with the latch unclasped;

FIG. 9 is a left view of the dry mobile device camera case in the closed position with the latch unclasped;

FIG. 10 is an external view of the dry mobile device camera case in the open position with the latch unclasped;

FIG. 11 is an internal view of the dry mobile device camera case in the open position with the latch unclasped;

FIG. 12 is a left view of the dry mobile device camera case in the open position with the latch unclasped; and,

FIG. 13 is an internal view of the mobile device in the dry mobile device camera case in the open position with the latch unclasped.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a dry mobile device camera case, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	To; Nguyen (Corona, CA), Namminga; Andrew (Costa Mesa, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type To; Nguyen Namminga; Andrew Corona Costa Mesa CA CA US US
Assignee:	Mophie, Inc. (Tustin, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/428,556
Filed:	July 31, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D3/294; D14/250
Current International Class:	0301
Field of Search:	;D3/294,285,289 ;D14/250

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

3019715	February 1962	Arnold et al.
D265829	August 1982	Shimoda
D419296	January 2000	Shinano
6138826	October 2000	Kanamori et al.
D453177	January 2002	Uehara
D464196	October 2002	Parker
7106959	September 2006	Sato
D537858	March 2007	Griffin et al.
7194202	March 2007	Funahashi et al.
D557897	December 2007	Richardson et al.
7653292	January 2010	Yamaguchi et al.
7679674	March 2010	Nishizawa
D616479	May 2010	Ganahl, Jr.
D621432	August 2010	Yim
7801425	September 2010	Fantone et al.
7929847	April 2011	Yim
D645663	September 2011	Henley et al.
D646313	October 2011	Woodman
D647303	October 2011	Mish et al.
D647554	October 2011	Yim
D657808	April 2012	Woodman
8244118	August 2012	Stansbury
2005/0115852	June 2005	Funahashi et al.
2006/0008262	January 2006	Watanabe et al.
2006/0193615	August 2006	Funahashi et al.
2007/0071423	March 2007	Fantone et al.
2007/0110416	May 2007	Yamaguchi et al.
2009/0110380	April 2009	Fantone et al.
2009/0317069	December 2009	Yim
2011/0147245	June 2011	Yim
2013/0184033	July 2013	Willenborg

Other References

US. Appl. No. 29/436,918, filed Nov. 9, 2012, To et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/436,927, filed Nov. 9, 2012, To et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/441,595, filed Jan. 7, 2013, Namminga et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/441,597, filed Jan. 7, 2013, Namminga et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/428,555, filed Jul. 31, 2012, To et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/410,511, filed Jan. 9, 2012, To. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Baynham; Holly
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP