Shoe upper
Rasmussen February 25, 2
U.S. patent number D699,933 [Application Number D/465,595] was granted by the patent office on 2014-02-25 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jeff Rasmussen.
| United States Patent | D699,933 |
| Rasmussen | February 25, 2014 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Rasmussen; Jeff (Portland, OR) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/465,595 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | August 29, 2013 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,906-908,944,946,947,962,969,972-974 ;36/45,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131,134 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D392792 | March 1998 | Obi |
| D413196 | August 1999 | Hatfield |
| D415883 | November 1999 | Kozo |
| D471349 | March 2003 | Nason |
| D474009 | May 2003 | Lotti |
| D508766 | August 2005 | McDowell |
| D526772 | August 2006 | Cass |
| D527884 | September 2006 | Morris |
| D535095 | January 2007 | Sung |
| D540532 | April 2007 | Sung |
| D544697 | June 2007 | Huthmaker |
| D575941 | September 2008 | Weber |
| D649769 | December 2011 | Thornhill |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2009 Fall: Sport Performance Footwear, p. 205, published Nov. 2008, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2009 Holiday: Core Footwear, p. 10, published Feb. 2009, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2010 Spring: Core Performance Footwear, p. 8, published May 2009, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2010 Holiday: Men's Footwear: Performance, p. 56, published Feb. 2010, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2011 Summer: Men's Footwear: Nike Sportswear, p. 6, published Aug. 2010, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Spring: Core Footwear, p. 11, published May 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Spring: Men's Performance Footwear, p. 36, published May 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Summer: Men's Performance Footwear, p. 53, published Aug. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant . Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Holiday: Men's Performance Footwear, p. 22, published Feb. 2012, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The unshaded regions within or adjacent to the shaded area that are demarcated in whole or in part by broken lines form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 